You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Starmer's Labour in power
November 21 2024 9.37am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Starmer's Labour in power

Previous Topic | Next Topic


  

Stirlingsays Flag 13 Aug 24 4.22pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

The UBS are saying that due to the heralded changes soon to be introduced by Labour that the UK will continue to lose many millionaires.

Giving off the impression that we could be in for a 'Hollande' type experience of wealth flight where we actually end up with less tax and thus worse public services.

Apparently under the changes when earning £500k, you pay £211,203 in Income Tax.

To replace that

28 more need to earn 50k (£7,486 tax each)
85 more 25k (£2,486 each)
435 more 15k (£486 each)


Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Aug 2024 4.27pm)

wealthchange.JPG Attachment: wealthchange.JPG (79.45Kb)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 13 Aug 24 4.30pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Not meant as a criticism, Stirling me old mucker, but are they gunning for 'wealth' (when you say "millionaires" ) or income, as you suggest with your example? I accept that an income of £500k pa will mean the person is going to be a millionaire regardless, but you can easily be a millionaire these days without much of an income. That's certainly my situation and doubtless the situation of our resident troll, with his property empire of Robbie Fowler proportions.

Edited by YT (13 Aug 2024 4.31pm)

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 13 Aug 24 4.37pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by YT

Not meant as a criticism, Stirling me old mucker, but are they gunning for 'wealth' (when you say "millionaires" ) or income, as you suggest with your example? I accept that an income of £500k pa will mean the person is going to be a millionaire regardless, but you can easily be a millionaire these days without much of an income. That's certainly my situation and doubtless the situation of our resident troll, with his property empire of Robbie Fowler proportions.

Edited by YT (13 Aug 2024 4.31pm)

I certainly don't take that as a criticism as you are right.

Even without a hefty income due to the inflation we have seen over our lifetimes...people's homes, paid for over decades of hard work, can now easily make people 'asset' millionaires when their incomes are anything but.

You know that today's weird brew of neoliberal/socialists are licking their lips over wealth that can't run off.

However the globalism they otherwise adore will always hurt their grand designs....kind of an irony really.


Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Aug 2024 4.40pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 13 Aug 24 5.58pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

The UK has had very little investment, necessary to produce growth, particularly since the vote in 2016, but since the banking crisis of 2008 so it bumps along the bottom, stagnating.

Millionaires, wealthy bankers etc. are not beneficial to the economy unless they invest and spend in it, but rather they accumulate which the system incentifies them to do through all the tax breaks they get. you are really subsidising their wealth.

Re-distribution of this gradually into the system would put money into the pockets of people who spend, from the people who do not, creating demand for goods and services.

'There is no direct link between savings and investment'- Keynes.

Ultimately one of the crop of chancellors is going to have to tax wealth, if only because they actually have it.



Edited by steeleye20 (13 Aug 2024 5.59pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Aug 24 6.11pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

The UK has had very little investment, necessary to produce growth, particularly since the vote in 2016, but since the banking crisis of 2008 so it bumps along the bottom, stagnating.

Millionaires, wealthy bankers etc. are not beneficial to the economy unless they invest and spend in it, but rather they accumulate which the system incentifies them to do through all the tax breaks they get. you are really subsidising their wealth.

Re-distribution of this gradually into the system would put money into the pockets of people who spend, from the people who do not, creating demand for goods and services.

'There is no direct link between savings and investment'- Keynes.

Ultimately one of the crop of chancellors is going to have to tax wealth, if only because they actually have it.



Edited by steeleye20 (13 Aug 2024 5.59pm)

All property is theft.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 13 Aug 24 7.15pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

The UK has had very little investment, necessary to produce growth, particularly since the vote in 2016, but since the banking crisis of 2008 so it bumps along the bottom, stagnating.

Millionaires, wealthy bankers etc. are not beneficial to the economy unless they invest and spend in it, but rather they accumulate which the system incentifies them to do through all the tax breaks they get. you are really subsidising their wealth.

Re-distribution of this gradually into the system would put money into the pockets of people who spend, from the people who do not, creating demand for goods and services.

'There is no direct link between savings and investment'- Keynes.

Ultimately one of the crop of chancellors is going to have to tax wealth, if only because they actually have it.

Edited by steeleye20 (13 Aug 2024 5.59pm)

These communist policies have of course been tried before. When Wilson and Healy put the highest tax rate at 83%, the wealthy people just moved their money and/or themselves abroad. When the Tories reduced corporation tax they found that income from it was higher than under the old higher rates because it wasn't worth the time and cost of companies to use schemes to avoid it.

When your approach has been adopted by full-blown socialist/communist economies, it resulted in standards of living that you and your ilk would find totally unacceptable. In the USSR, Mao's China, and still in North Korea, people were reduced to starvation with accompanying cannibalism of children. A small price to pay I guess in building the great socialist utopia.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
orpingtoneagle Flag Orpington 13 Aug 24 7.21pm Send a Private Message to orpingtoneagle Add orpingtoneagle as a friend

The super wealthy can afford to live where they want to and pay tax pretty much at will.

Will they all leave? Maybe. The financial sector and stock market were supposed to be decimated by Brexit and that did not happen.

So far the tax and investment policies suggested for example changes to IHT would have little effects on the super rich as they can simply organise their affairs to bypass them.

Taxing the super rich is quite a difficult thing to do

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 13 Aug 24 11.18pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by YT

Not meant as a criticism, Stirling me old mucker, but are they gunning for 'wealth' (when you say "millionaires" ) or income, as you suggest with your example? I accept that an income of £500k pa will mean the person is going to be a millionaire regardless, but you can easily be a millionaire these days without much of an income. That's certainly my situation and doubtless the situation of our resident troll, with his property empire of Robbie Fowler proportions.

Edited by YT (13 Aug 2024 4.31pm)

The troll does not have an " empire ", he likes to give the false impression he has some kind of super business success.

That "success" is such his wife still has to work all hours in the NHS as he often reminds us.

Expedite the ignore button

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 13 Aug 24 11.22pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

The Laffer Curve explains that higher tax rates do not result in more tax revenue.

This does not suit the left wing ideology of punishing wealth for the sake of it even though it means less overall revenue.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 14 Aug 24 12.17am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

The troll does not have an " empire ", he likes to give the false impression he has some kind of super business success.

That "success" is such his wife still has to work all hours in the NHS as he often reminds us.

Expedite the ignore button

So he has time for bowls and chatting to racist Dave down the pub !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  


Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Starmer's Labour in power