This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
PatrickA London 20 Jan 24 7.35pm | |
---|---|
A lot of discussion at the moment is around the blame game. Looking at it objectively over the course of the last calendar year, 2023, both our results and performances were poor other than for a brief period at the end of last season. This season we’ve failed to score in 36% of our games . Going forward we have a number of choices. 1)Bring in some genuinely transformational players to make a difference - unlikely because of the cost. 2) Change the tactics to play more progressively and hope that Eze and Olise stay fit - a risk because of their fitness records and Roy seemingly unable to find a way of carrying a threat in their absence. 3)Change the manager to create a new impetus and remove the air of stagnation and staleness which runs through the team and the performances- this assumes there is a good manager available and willing to take over at this stage of the season. At the moment 3 looks the most realistic option to me. This is not to suggest that Hodgson is a bad manager, but sometimes a change is necessary to inject fresh impetus and create a positive environment where all the players start with a clean slate desperate to prove themselves.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Davepalace707 Northumberland 20 Jan 24 7.39pm | |
---|---|
100pc
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 20 Jan 24 7.42pm | |
---|---|
Under this board and this manager "going forward" is not a viable reality. We haven't gone forward in 11 seasons. As I keep saying we were a better side under Pulis. We don't move forward, we tread water. For some just being in the PL is enough, but all the signs are there that it could come crashing down sooner than one thinks.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CPFC1965 Warrington 20 Jan 24 7.53pm | |
---|---|
Option 3 would be my preferred choice, I personally don't think he's a bad manager, it's just that his tactics are seriously outdated obsolete almost. Modern managers make changes as games progress, sadly that is not Roy's way. Then again I don't see Cooper or Potter being the answer either. Carrick has been mentioned along with the Ipswich manager but in all scenarios if money is that tight, pay offs and compensation certainly won't be in the budget. Sadly I can see this fiasco running to season end with our 🦕 still in charge.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 20 Jan 24 8.11pm | |
---|---|
I thought your thread title was Roy’s new training MO.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 21 Jan 24 10.43am | |
---|---|
I don't think Roy responds patricularly to being under pressure and scrutiny.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
monkey Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 21 Jan 24 10.48am | |
---|---|
We all know there’s an option 4……stay exactly as we are and hope we scrape enough points to stay up, which is the more likely
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 21 Jan 24 10.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I don't think Roy responds patricularly to being under pressure and scrutiny.
On the latest post-match presser when asked what message he had for his players after the Arsenal fiasco, it was that they should keep working on what they practice in training. Clearly what they bare doing in training isn't working as is evidenced by our results since October.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 21 Jan 24 11.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
A lot of discussion at the moment is around the blame game. Looking at it objectively over the course of the last calendar year, 2023, both our results and performances were poor other than for a brief period at the end of last season. This season we’ve failed to score in 36% of our games . Going forward we have a number of choices. 1)Bring in some genuinely transformational players to make a difference - unlikely because of the cost. 2) Change the tactics to play more progressively and hope that Eze and Olise stay fit - a risk because of their fitness records and Roy seemingly unable to find a way of carrying a threat in their absence. 3)Change the manager to create a new impetus and remove the air of stagnation and staleness which runs through the team and the performances- this assumes there is a good manager available and willing to take over at this stage of the season. At the moment 3 looks the most realistic option to me. This is not to suggest that Hodgson is a bad manager, but sometimes a change is necessary to inject fresh impetus and create a positive environment where all the players start with a clean slate desperate to prove themselves. I think 1) can be addressed. We’ve all known for some time that as little as 3 or 4 players could transform this team into a highly competitive unit and yet we’ve ignored the holes and spent poorly for numerous windows. The secret to success at our level is to identify players who are not at their peak yet and are therefore more affordable. We did it with Olise and Eze. We missed out on players such as Toney, Bowen, Gyokeres, Hamer, Walker-Peters, and a whole host of others that were low to mid priced. We could have got Gyokeres at around £20m and he now has an £80m plus buy out clause which Chelsea are apparently considering having scored something like 20 goals in 23 games. The whole França situation stinks to me. Olise and Eze were known quantities both having excelled one league down. Franca is an unknown quantity and yet we have risked more on him than both of our young stars. We then buy a keeper and a centre half that we didn’t really need and when we looked in the cookie jar, surprise surprise it is empty. As good as Dougie has done in bringing Johnstone, Anderson, Doucouré, Guehi, Eze and Olise to the club, we’ve made some errors and failed to address important areas of the squad, the main two being the full back positions and a proper Zaha replacement, a creative midfielder also wouldn’t go amiss.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 21 Jan 24 11.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I don't think Roy responds patricularly to being under pressure and scrutiny. When Roy accepted the job last summer I'm sure he didn't envisage being in his current position. So it's not surprising that we are seeing a side to him that we haven't seen before. I feel sorry for him. He looks like somebody that just wants to be put out of their misery. Unfortunately for him, I don't think Parish has an escape plan. We'll see. In terms of playing style and finding ways to win etc., it's been said before. Roy is not that man. You might as well tell Leonardo DiCaprio to only date older women in future. Andersen and Guehi are now struggling under the pressure of carrying a team that has become too easy to play against. I understand the experiment of Richards as a CDM, but it ain't working.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CpfcWeTrust1 21 Jan 24 11.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
I think 1) can be addressed. We’ve all known for some time that as little as 3 or 4 players could transform this team into a highly competitive unit and yet we’ve ignored the holes and spent poorly for numerous windows. The secret to success at our level is to identify players who are not at their peak yet and are therefore more affordable. We did it with Olise and Eze. We missed out on players such as Toney, Bowen, Gyokeres, Hamer, Walker-Peters, and a whole host of others that were low to mid priced. We could have got Gyokeres at around £20m and he now has an £80m plus buy out clause which Chelsea are apparently considering having scored something like 20 goals in 23 games. The whole França situation stinks to me. Olise and Eze were known quantities both having excelled one league down. Franca is an unknown quantity and yet we have risked more on him than both of our young stars. We then buy a keeper and a centre half that we didn’t really need and when we looked in the cookie jar, surprise surprise it is empty. As good as Dougie has done in bringing Johnstone, Anderson, Doucouré, Guehi, Eze and Olise to the club, we’ve made some errors and failed to address important areas of the squad, the main two being the full back positions and a proper Zaha replacement, a creative midfielder also wouldn’t go amiss. I'll call this post for what it is, ridiculous observation. You can't just buy players, they have to want to actually come to the club and for a certain wage and to wsnt to play for a manager. Lordy, if it was as easy as buying something off the shelf it'd make our lives easier. As for the goalkeeper thing, yes it was a silly purchase but the irony is we did need a goalkeeper in the end as Sam.J had an injury and Guaita had buggered off. DF has done a decent job and Franca hasn't actually been given a chance unless the teams already lost or hes played out of position. Same for Ahemada. You've picked such a basic principal of player acquisition that I find it baffling. I mean you have to be able to retain those players also, Olise being a prime example. You can buy all the great players but keeping them is a battle and fans will have to face the fact that Palace needs to sell assets to buy more assets(in terms of players.) I highly doubt DF has not bothered with enquiring about players, there's a whole scouting team behind it. If you were a player, would you be enticed by the stadium, manager, type of tactics used, team position? I highly doubt it. So, what has it got going for it? High wages which affect us buying more players, a chance to prove yourself and use Palace as a stepping stone.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fish mitten Chelmsford 21 Jan 24 11.31am | |
---|---|
Leeds, Leicester and Southampton tried option 3 last season and didn't have as much success as we did with it. Board has to invest in new players. They failed to invest in the correct players in the summer as well as the two windows before that. Personally whilst the football may be dire under Roy, we take a real gamble if we change manager and don't bring in several new players (perhaps 2 permanents and 2 loans - for positions we need) I don't think that will happen. At best 1 loan in. I think SP will sack Roy, appoint Paddy on an interim basis as it will be the cheap option and whether we stay up will be dependent if players can stay fit, and Olise and Eze can produce a few bits of magic. Will also be dependent upon three teams being worse and/or significant points deductions for Forest and Everton again. Personally if we get new players in and keep Roy I reckon we have a 80% chance of survival. Sack him and get no one in I reckon 50% at best.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.