You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Going forward
November 21 2024 5.56pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Going forward

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

PatrickA Flag London 20 Jan 24 7.35pm Send a Private Message to PatrickA Add PatrickA as a friend

A lot of discussion at the moment is around the blame game.
Is it the fault of Hodgson, Parish, Freedman, the owners, players or some combination of the above?
That discussion can possibly wait for another day, but what is for the best going forward?

Looking at it objectively over the course of the last calendar year, 2023, both our results and performances were poor other than for a brief period at the end of last season.
This would indicate that we’re possibly not very good, other than the brief honeymoon period after Hodgson returned.
In a sense it didn’t matter whether Vieira or Hodgson was in charge , we weren’t very good over the whole calendar year.

This season we’ve failed to score in 36% of our games .
That means in around a third of our games we give ourselves no chance of winning.
That’s a hell of a handicap to carry around.

Going forward we have a number of choices.

1)Bring in some genuinely transformational players to make a difference - unlikely because of the cost.

2) Change the tactics to play more progressively and hope that Eze and Olise stay fit - a risk because of their fitness records and Roy seemingly unable to find a way of carrying a threat in their absence.

3)Change the manager to create a new impetus and remove the air of stagnation and staleness which runs through the team and the performances- this assumes there is a good manager available and willing to take over at this stage of the season.

At the moment 3 looks the most realistic option to me.

This is not to suggest that Hodgson is a bad manager, but sometimes a change is necessary to inject fresh impetus and create a positive environment where all the players start with a clean slate desperate to prove themselves.
It’s all gone a bit stale and it’s easier to change the manager than all the players.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Davepalace707 Flag Northumberland 20 Jan 24 7.39pm Send a Private Message to Davepalace707 Add Davepalace707 as a friend

100pc

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
southnorwoodhill Flag 20 Jan 24 7.42pm Send a Private Message to southnorwoodhill Add southnorwoodhill as a friend

Under this board and this manager "going forward" is not a viable reality. We haven't gone forward in 11 seasons. As I keep saying we were a better side under Pulis. We don't move forward, we tread water. For some just being in the PL is enough, but all the signs are there that it could come crashing down sooner than one thinks.
Keep spinning those plates Steve.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
CPFC1965 Flag Warrington 20 Jan 24 7.53pm Send a Private Message to CPFC1965 Add CPFC1965 as a friend

Option 3 would be my preferred choice, I personally don't think he's a bad manager, it's just that his tactics are seriously outdated obsolete almost. Modern managers make changes as games progress, sadly that is not Roy's way. Then again I don't see Cooper or Potter being the answer either. Carrick has been mentioned along with the Ipswich manager but in all scenarios if money is that tight, pay offs and compensation certainly won't be in the budget. Sadly I can see this fiasco running to season end with our 🦕 still in charge.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 20 Jan 24 8.11pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

I thought your thread title was Roy’s new training MO.
Then I realised he doesn’t like to !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PatrickA Flag London 21 Jan 24 10.43am Send a Private Message to PatrickA Add PatrickA as a friend

I don't think Roy responds patricularly to being under pressure and scrutiny.
This is not a criticism, just an observation.
We're seeing England and Liverpool Roy - brittle, defensive,
negative ,stubborn and seemingly clueless.
He keeps saying we just hope to be able to get players back, almost writing off games in the meantime.
What if Olise and Eze just don't recover form and fitness this season, which has to be a possibilty?
Surely, Hodgson's task is to find a way of competing and carrying a threat even in their absence?
I'm not saying it's easy with squad deficiencies, but at least give it a go rather than be defeatist .
We've been shocking defensively recently too, supposedly Roy's great strength.
I don't know whether this pressure that Roy is feeling is transferring to the players, but it is noteworthy that even e.g Guehi and Anderson are struggling with wild clearances and sloppy passes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
monkey Flag Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 21 Jan 24 10.48am Send a Private Message to monkey Add monkey as a friend

We all know there’s an option 4……stay exactly as we are and hope we scrape enough points to stay up, which is the more likely

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 21 Jan 24 10.57am Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by PatrickA

I don't think Roy responds patricularly to being under pressure and scrutiny.
This is not a criticism, just an observation.
We're seeing England and Liverpool Roy - brittle, defensive,
negative ,stubborn and seemingly clueless.
He keeps saying we just hope to be able to get players back, almost writing off games in the meantime.
What if Olise and Eze just don't recover form and fitness this season, which has to be a possibilty?
Surely, Hodgson's task is to find a way of competing and carrying a threat even in their absence?
I'm not saying it's easy with squad deficiencies, but at least give it a go rather than be defeatist .
We've been shocking defensively recently too, supposedly Roy's great strength.
I don't know whether this pressure that Roy is feeling is transferring to the players, but it is noteworthy that even e.g Guehi and Anderson are struggling with wild clearances and sloppy passes.


I think You're spot on Patrick. I get the impression that Hodgson thinks he's been in football so long that there's nothing left for him to learn. In the pre-Arsenal presser he rejected the idea that our record of conceding goals in the last 15 minutes may have something to do with players being tired. Why? Because the metrics told him so. I'd be interested to know how the metrics record tired minds.

On the latest post-match presser when asked what message he had for his players after the Arsenal fiasco, it was that they should keep working on what they practice in training. Clearly what they bare doing in training isn't working as is evidenced by our results since October.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 21 Jan 24 11.12am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by PatrickA

A lot of discussion at the moment is around the blame game.
Is it the fault of Hodgson, Parish, Freedman, the owners, players or some combination of the above?
That discussion can possibly wait for another day, but what is for the best going forward?

Looking at it objectively over the course of the last calendar year, 2023, both our results and performances were poor other than for a brief period at the end of last season.
This would indicate that we’re possibly not very good, other than the brief honeymoon period after Hodgson returned.
In a sense it didn’t matter whether Vieira or Hodgson was in charge , we weren’t very good over the whole calendar year.

This season we’ve failed to score in 36% of our games .
That means in around a third of our games we give ourselves no chance of winning.
That’s a hell of a handicap to carry around.

Going forward we have a number of choices.

1)Bring in some genuinely transformational players to make a difference - unlikely because of the cost.

2) Change the tactics to play more progressively and hope that Eze and Olise stay fit - a risk because of their fitness records and Roy seemingly unable to find a way of carrying a threat in their absence.

3)Change the manager to create a new impetus and remove the air of stagnation and staleness which runs through the team and the performances- this assumes there is a good manager available and willing to take over at this stage of the season.

At the moment 3 looks the most realistic option to me.

This is not to suggest that Hodgson is a bad manager, but sometimes a change is necessary to inject fresh impetus and create a positive environment where all the players start with a clean slate desperate to prove themselves.
It’s all gone a bit stale and it’s easier to change the manager than all the players.


I think 1) can be addressed. We’ve all known for some time that as little as 3 or 4 players could transform this team into a highly competitive unit and yet we’ve ignored the holes and spent poorly for numerous windows.

The secret to success at our level is to identify players who are not at their peak yet and are therefore more affordable. We did it with Olise and Eze. We missed out on players such as Toney, Bowen, Gyokeres, Hamer, Walker-Peters, and a whole host of others that were low to mid priced. We could have got Gyokeres at around £20m and he now has an £80m plus buy out clause which Chelsea are apparently considering having scored something like 20 goals in 23 games.

The whole França situation stinks to me. Olise and Eze were known quantities both having excelled one league down. Franca is an unknown quantity and yet we have risked more on him than both of our young stars. We then buy a keeper and a centre half that we didn’t really need and when we looked in the cookie jar, surprise surprise it is empty.

As good as Dougie has done in bringing Johnstone, Anderson, Doucouré, Guehi, Eze and Olise to the club, we’ve made some errors and failed to address important areas of the squad, the main two being the full back positions and a proper Zaha replacement, a creative midfielder also wouldn’t go amiss.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 21 Jan 24 11.22am Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by PatrickA

I don't think Roy responds patricularly to being under pressure and scrutiny.
This is not a criticism, just an observation.
We're seeing England and Liverpool Roy - brittle, defensive,
negative ,stubborn and seemingly clueless.
He keeps saying we just hope to be able to get players back, almost writing off games in the meantime.
What if Olise and Eze just don't recover form and fitness this season, which has to be a possibilty?
Surely, Hodgson's task is to find a way of competing and carrying a threat even in their absence?
I'm not saying it's easy with squad deficiencies, but at least give it a go rather than be defeatist .
We've been shocking defensively recently too, supposedly Roy's great strength.
I don't know whether this pressure that Roy is feeling is transferring to the players, but it is noteworthy that even e.g Guehi and Anderson are struggling with wild clearances and sloppy passes.

When Roy accepted the job last summer I'm sure he didn't envisage being in his current position. So it's not surprising that we are seeing a side to him that we haven't seen before. I feel sorry for him. He looks like somebody that just wants to be put out of their misery. Unfortunately for him, I don't think Parish has an escape plan. We'll see.

In terms of playing style and finding ways to win etc., it's been said before. Roy is not that man. You might as well tell Leonardo DiCaprio to only date older women in future.

Andersen and Guehi are now struggling under the pressure of carrying a team that has become too easy to play against. I understand the experiment of Richards as a CDM, but it ain't working.

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
CpfcWeTrust1 Flag 21 Jan 24 11.28am Send a Private Message to CpfcWeTrust1 Add CpfcWeTrust1 as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

I think 1) can be addressed. We’ve all known for some time that as little as 3 or 4 players could transform this team into a highly competitive unit and yet we’ve ignored the holes and spent poorly for numerous windows.

The secret to success at our level is to identify players who are not at their peak yet and are therefore more affordable. We did it with Olise and Eze. We missed out on players such as Toney, Bowen, Gyokeres, Hamer, Walker-Peters, and a whole host of others that were low to mid priced. We could have got Gyokeres at around £20m and he now has an £80m plus buy out clause which Chelsea are apparently considering having scored something like 20 goals in 23 games.

The whole França situation stinks to me. Olise and Eze were known quantities both having excelled one league down. Franca is an unknown quantity and yet we have risked more on him than both of our young stars. We then buy a keeper and a centre half that we didn’t really need and when we looked in the cookie jar, surprise surprise it is empty.

As good as Dougie has done in bringing Johnstone, Anderson, Doucouré, Guehi, Eze and Olise to the club, we’ve made some errors and failed to address important areas of the squad, the main two being the full back positions and a proper Zaha replacement, a creative midfielder also wouldn’t go amiss.

I'll call this post for what it is, ridiculous observation.

You can't just buy players, they have to want to actually come to the club and for a certain wage and to wsnt to play for a manager. Lordy, if it was as easy as buying something off the shelf it'd make our lives easier. As for the goalkeeper thing, yes it was a silly purchase but the irony is we did need a goalkeeper in the end as Sam.J had an injury and Guaita had buggered off. DF has done a decent job and Franca hasn't actually been given a chance unless the teams already lost or hes played out of position. Same for Ahemada.

You've picked such a basic principal of player acquisition that I find it baffling. I mean you have to be able to retain those players also, Olise being a prime example. You can buy all the great players but keeping them is a battle and fans will have to face the fact that Palace needs to sell assets to buy more assets(in terms of players.) I highly doubt DF has not bothered with enquiring about players, there's a whole scouting team behind it.

If you were a player, would you be enticed by the stadium, manager, type of tactics used, team position?

I highly doubt it.

So, what has it got going for it? High wages which affect us buying more players, a chance to prove yourself and use Palace as a stepping stone.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
fish mitten Flag Chelmsford 21 Jan 24 11.31am Send a Private Message to fish mitten Add fish mitten as a friend

Leeds, Leicester and Southampton tried option 3 last season and didn't have as much success as we did with it.

Board has to invest in new players. They failed to invest in the correct players in the summer as well as the two windows before that.

Personally whilst the football may be dire under Roy, we take a real gamble if we change manager and don't bring in several new players (perhaps 2 permanents and 2 loans - for positions we need)

I don't think that will happen. At best 1 loan in. I think SP will sack Roy, appoint Paddy on an interim basis as it will be the cheap option and whether we stay up will be dependent if players can stay fit, and Olise and Eze can produce a few bits of magic.

Will also be dependent upon three teams being worse and/or significant points deductions for Forest and Everton again.

Personally if we get new players in and keep Roy I reckon we have a 80% chance of survival. Sack him and get no one in I reckon 50% at best.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Going forward