Perhaps someone from CPFC could share this information with us fans!
In my view if there is a £35m clause he’ll be gone as soon as he’s fit.
Without a clause we’ll probably still sell but surely for a minimum of £50m

Perhaps they don't want to add fuel to the fire?

Provide more column inches to meedjia desperate to have something to write about ?

I expect we are just hoping that the story dies a death & everyone moves on to the next transfer story of the day.

I would believe him above any Journo

“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

seeming as a contract essentially represents the worth of a player to a club, then for us to offer him an extension on bigger terms there must have been a shift in the release clause if it remained.

with the current market prices if the clause did remain it wouldnt have been unreasonable for the £35m to almost doubled if it is still there.

i have no more info than anybody else, but i cant for one minute believe it stayed in the new contract at £35m.

‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway

He did have a clause when first signing and now has signed a new deal which did not have one in.

(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

I would expect the information to be more, shall I say, correct if that were the case.