This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Teddy Eagle 15 Feb 23 1.09pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 15 Feb 23 2.36pm | |
---|---|
15% wow talk about rinsing the voters. Looks like the council want out !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 15 Feb 23 3.13pm | |
---|---|
The council is bankrupt no doubt they will blame the previous administration but someone has to pay. If the government pays it's a green light to other councils to act irresponsibly. I feel sorry for the locals but next time they might want to think before ticking the box at election time.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 15 Feb 23 5.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
The council is bankrupt no doubt they will blame the previous administration but someone has to pay. If the government pays it's a green light to other councils to act irresponsibly. I feel sorry for the locals but next time they might want to think before ticking the box at election time. Soooo I actually live in central Croydon, so unlike a lot of the posters on threads re. UK or Croydon centric affairs on here (some of whom don't even live in the UK) therefore I'll offer my more relevant view from the ground. Objectively, I can also understand why a 15% raise has been proposed. I don't think there is any other option at this point. I hardly think this raise has been decided upon without trying to find a viable alternative... such a massive hike so early in the mayors tenure is tantamount to career suicide. The alternative is massive cuts to core services and they've clearly decided that would be even worse. However, Croydon has been chronically underfunded for years, when compared with other councils (per resident) considering its size and more importantly its role in taking the lions share of London centric immigration, whether that be through asylum or otherwise, compared with any other council. If this had been appreciated and properly funded, there would be less of an issue – services would be able to keep pace. It is in fact the largest borough by population in London and has one of the fastest rates of population growth out of any London borough. It is the fall guy and should be adequately compensated as a result. Instead, it is expected to take the population hit at the expense of other councils and its residents suffer as a result. Granted most boroughs have seen their funding reduced drastically since 2010, but Croydon has suffered more than most. It is also worth noting that the debt pile of some £1.5bn is a legacy that dates back further than the previous Labour administration. I believe it was something in the region of £700m at the time Labour took over. It probably goes back even further than that. That's not to excuse how some of it has been fuelled by chronic mismanagement, but to suggest that it is all the fault of one term is simply not true. In fact, even if it had been managed properly throughout the labour tenure the debt pile would still have grown significantly due to the massive reduction in central funding and government treating it as a population dumping ground. I have no issue with a growing population in this borough – it's the largest and has one of the most aggressive planning and building strategies in London, so it makes sense. But it only works if it is reclassified and correctly funded in line with the role it plays (to the benefit of a lot of other boroughs) – and treated like the 'city within a city' that it actually is. Those other better funded councils should also start taking their share of the population growth burden. This is clearly not something the government are prepared to do in the near term, hence the 15% increase. It's going to be debated on March 1 in the council meeting but I'm not sure anything is going to change, if they've decided things are so bad that the nuclear option is the only option I can't see them rowing it back. Residents voices will rightly be heard but a reduction won't be forthcoming. So I understand the pushback, but it needs to happen. It's going to destroy a lot of people and that's not right... but the origins of this raise go a lot further back and spread a lot wider than the last council administration. Edited by SW19 CPFC (15 Feb 2023 5.18pm)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 15 Feb 23 6.18pm | |
---|---|
Council tax would be a lot fairer if it were actually a tax, rather than a post-tax flat-rate levy (albeit the flat rate varies depending on how big your drum is).
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 15 Feb 23 6.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Soooo I actually live in central Croydon, so unlike a lot of the posters on threads re. UK or Croydon centric affairs on here (some of whom don't even live in the UK) therefore I'll offer my more relevant view from the ground. Objectively, I can also understand why a 15% raise has been proposed. I don't think there is any other option at this point. I hardly think this raise has been decided upon without trying to find a viable alternative... such a massive hike so early in the mayors tenure is tantamount to career suicide. The alternative is massive cuts to core services and they've clearly decided that would be even worse. However, Croydon has been chronically underfunded for years, when compared with other councils (per resident) considering its size and more importantly its role in taking the lions share of London centric immigration, whether that be through asylum or otherwise, compared with any other council. If this had been appreciated and properly funded, there would be less of an issue – services would be able to keep pace. It is in fact the largest borough by population in London and has one of the fastest rates of population growth out of any London borough. It is the fall guy and should be adequately compensated as a result. Instead, it is expected to take the population hit at the expense of other councils and its residents suffer as a result. Granted most boroughs have seen their funding reduced drastically since 2010, but Croydon has suffered more than most. It is also worth noting that the debt pile of some £1.5bn is a legacy that dates back further than the previous Labour administration. I believe it was something in the region of £700m at the time Labour took over. It probably goes back even further than that. That's not to excuse how some of it has been fuelled by chronic mismanagement, but to suggest that it is all the fault of one term is simply not true. In fact, even if it had been managed properly throughout the labour tenure the debt pile would still have grown significantly due to the massive reduction in central funding and government treating it as a population dumping ground. I have no issue with a growing population in this borough – it's the largest and has one of the most aggressive planning and building strategies in London, so it makes sense. But it only works if it is reclassified and correctly funded in line with the role it plays (to the benefit of a lot of other boroughs) – and treated like the 'city within a city' that it actually is. Those other better funded councils should also start taking their share of the population growth burden. This is clearly not something the government are prepared to do in the near term, hence the 15% increase. It's going to be debated on March 1 in the council meeting but I'm not sure anything is going to change, if they've decided things are so bad that the nuclear option is the only option I can't see them rowing it back. Residents voices will rightly be heard but a reduction won't be forthcoming. So I understand the pushback, but it needs to happen. It's going to destroy a lot of people and that's not right... but the origins of this raise go a lot further back and spread a lot wider than the last council administration. Edited by SW19 CPFC (15 Feb 2023 5.18pm) So, matters have got significantly worse during the current administration, but it’s not their fault, despite going bust and central government having to take over to deal with their inadequacies. Are you serious? You can’t just throw money at incompetency, they have already proved that doesn’t work.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 15 Feb 23 6.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
So, matters have got significantly worse during the current administration, but it’s not their fault, despite going bust and central government having to take over to deal with their inadequacies. Are you serious? You can’t just throw money at incompetency, they have already proved that doesn’t work. Maybe read it again My point is it’s cumulative and can’t all be pinned on one set of people. Sure they can be one of the bigger drivers of the issue but they’re not the only driver. All the detail and nuance (plus the bit where I clearly call out labours inadequacies) has been ignored. Jesus some people are either so wildly partisan they are blinded to reason or they’re just extremely stupid.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 15 Feb 23 8.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Maybe read it again My point is it’s cumulative and can’t all be pinned on one set of people. Sure they can be one of the bigger drivers of the issue but they’re not the only driver. All the detail and nuance (plus the bit where I clearly call out labours inadequacies) has been ignored. Jesus some people are either so wildly partisan they are blinded to reason or they’re just extremely stupid.
I think Croydon is a lesson to us all we should all keep an eye on how our local council manages it's finances and services and if they start to falter punish them at the ballot box. Nothing changes a politicians mind more than the risk of losing their cushy job. Regarding the level of funding I agree it's a problem Bromley has been underfunded for decades if you look at how much they get compared to inner London boroughs. No doubt others will also feel hard done by. Anyway Bromley's finances were in good shape last time I looked (2 tears ago) but I suspect some will complain they have cut services but you have to balance the books.
Edited by Badger11 (15 Feb 2023 8.19pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lombardinho London 15 Feb 23 9.19pm | |
---|---|
...is voluntary.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 15 Feb 23 10.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Maybe read it again My point is it’s cumulative and can’t all be pinned on one set of people. Sure they can be one of the bigger drivers of the issue but they’re not the only driver. All the detail and nuance (plus the bit where I clearly call out labours inadequacies) has been ignored. Jesus some people are either so wildly partisan they are blinded to reason or they’re just extremely stupid. Since 1994 there have been two Conservative and five Labour councils. who is more responsible for the current situation?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 15 Feb 23 11.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Maybe read it again My point is it’s cumulative and can’t all be pinned on one set of people. Sure they can be one of the bigger drivers of the issue but they’re not the only driver. All the detail and nuance (plus the bit where I clearly call out labours inadequacies) has been ignored. Jesus some people are either so wildly partisan they are blinded to reason or they’re just extremely stupid. There is no nuance in incompetence. You can either do the job or you can’t and they clearly cannot. I really do not understand how you can even contemplate backing them and I don’t care what has gone on in the past, as the current encumbent should be there to improve things not make them worse.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 15 Feb 23 11.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Since 1994 there have been two Conservative and five Labour councils. who is more responsible for the current situation? Christ alive Why does everything have to be dumbed down to binary ‘so it was all their fault’ (insert political party here) drivel You’re not five The point (again) is that there are several major, cumulative factors that have contributed to the situation, of which, and I mention this clearly above, Labour is a major player. But if you want to interrogate the issue properly you can’t just go full partisan. Also the debt on takeover from the tories was nearly 900m, not 700m as I’d assumed above. its an important point but frankly it’s not always about tories vs Labour… to simplify it to that and only that all the time is lazy. This is a much broader issue of mismanagement and marginalisation by all parties at both council AND government level over many years. All the detail is there in the accounts and historical policy making, eg the decision to start hacking away council grants in 2010 and some councils suffering more than others (Croydon, -70%). Start by countering or discussing the breadth of the points made (ie the whole issue) not trying to constantly turn this into a Labour/Tories are worse so they’re drossfest. I’m more interested in all the reasons why, the chain of events, than partisan point scoring which is of little value to anyone. Edited by SW19 CPFC (15 Feb 2023 11.09pm)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.