This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Lies are lies no matter how green they are. Imo Unilever thought because it was highlighting green issues it could get away with it. Not the only company jumping on the bandwagon. May the pushback continue.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Companies always jump on bandwagons for PR. How many celebrate Pride or Black History month. Unilever should be hauled over the coals but what about the lies from the Green lobby, plenty of them around. How many time have we been told we are 10 years away from disaster? They started saying this in the sixties. I am not a climate change denier but I refuse to wear the hair shirt and am annoyed that the Greens block every attempt for us to generate our own energy. They don't get that they are against everything but for nothing. So for example Germany got rid of nuclear power and is now reliant on Russian gas, well done Greens.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Companies always jump on bandwagons for PR. How many celebrate Pride or Black History month. Unilever should be hauled over the coals but what about the lies from the Green lobby, plenty of them around. How many time have we been told we are 10 years away from disaster? They started saying this in the sixties. I am not a climate change denier but I refuse to wear the hair shirt and am annoyed that the Greens block every attempt for us to generate our own energy. They don't get that they are against everything but for nothing. So for example Germany got rid of nuclear power and is now reliant on Russian gas, well done Greens. Nuclear is not the answer. Less people is.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
That could go hand in hand
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Oddly enough when this is mentioned to the Greens they don't have answer. I wonder why? Edited by Badger11 (31 Aug 2022 10.46am)
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Strangely, from watching and listening to numerous environmentalist/green supporters, the effects on the planet that they appear so het up about always concerns how it's going to affect us/them (i.e. humans), rather than accepting that the planet can probably very happily regulate itself. It's always struck me as a very selfish movement.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Fewer people is actually the answer.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
Fewer people is actually the answer. You're a braver man than me YT.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This was put to Al Gore who was silent in reply. If you want to alienate the whole evangelical movement and many others to boot, try advocating policy on population control.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.