This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
beak croydon 09 Nov 20 9.08am | |
---|---|
I still don't understand why Bamford needed to point,the other Leeds players should know from the training ground where he needs the ball.A schoolboy error and one that Bielsa should have ironed out by now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CrazyBadger Ware 09 Nov 20 9.19am | |
---|---|
Bamford can Point if he want's to. Many strikers do this to let their teammates where they want to ball. Should never have been offside. I quite like The way he regurgitated Hodgsons words after the game "last time I looked you cant score a goal with your hand"
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
JohnB 09 Nov 20 9.22am | |
---|---|
Pretty certain that the majority of managers would completely disagree with you and want their players to communicate and show where they want the ball. Absurd that it was given offside, not that a player was showing where he wanted it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Nov 20 9.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JohnB
Pretty certain that the majority of managers would completely disagree with you and want their players to communicate and show where they want the ball. Absurd that it was given offside, not that a player was showing where he wanted it. It was offside as per the Law.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
JohnB 09 Nov 20 10.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
It was offside as per the Law. It wasn't. The FA website states: The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 09 Nov 20 10.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by beak
I still don't understand why Bamford needed to point,the other Leeds players should know from the training ground where he needs the ball.A schoolboy error and one that Bielsa should have ironed out by now.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Nov 20 10.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JohnB
It wasn't. The FA website states: The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. Bamford was adjudged offside due to the change in the handball law. Due to the fact that you can now play the ball with the top part of your arm (T-Shirt line) and not be adjudged handball, the outstretched arm played him offside. This was onside last season to the armpit.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 09 Nov 20 10.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JohnB
It wasn't. The FA website states: The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. From what I have read, it’s gone back to, you can score with the shoulder and upper arm and I think it’s the ‘T’ shirt description that defines which bit you can score with. So on that basis the VAR line would have been drawn from about halfway down his bicep.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 09 Nov 20 10.23am | |
---|---|
Great minds and all that Willo!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
coulsdoneagle London 09 Nov 20 10.29am | |
---|---|
Shocking decision. The line drawn in the tv looked way further down than the t-shirt line. Regardless it was given a goal on field and was so marginal it should have stood. Just because we benefited it’s still a crap decision and the sooner we get rid of this farce the better. If you have to spend minutes agonising over lines on a screen then just stick with the referees decision on field.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Nov 20 10.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Great minds and all that Willo! With respect "Great minds" and "Willo" should not be in the same sentence!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
antipodeagle Wellington 09 Nov 20 10.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
Shocking decision. The line drawn in the tv looked way further down than the t-shirt line. Regardless it was given a goal on field and was so marginal it should have stood. Just because we benefited it’s still a crap decision and the sooner we get rid of this farce the better. If you have to spend minutes agonising over lines on a screen then just stick with the referees decision on field. Agreed. VAR should be there to avoid clear and obvious errors by the ref. To me, if you look at a replay in slow motion and it's still not obvious that they're offside, then the attacking team get the benefit of the doubt. Freeze framing and using computer technology to draw various lines attached to various parts of players bodies isn't adding any value to anyone involved with the game.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.