Not a big fan of VAR on the whole.

However, could be a distinct advantage for us v Watford.

Their repeated challenges on Wilf will come into closer focus - remember the challenge on Andros by the Grimsby lad in the 3rd round game that got upgraded from yellow to red card.

There are bound to be penalty shouts in the box that will also get greater attention...hopefully revealing that our man really isn't the diver they make him out to be.

So for once I'm glad the VAR will be available.
Had we had it last Saturday, Knockaert would have been off in the first minute.

I'm a fan of it and agree with the OP... Hopefully it will stop them getting away with kicking lumps out of Wilf!!

Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!!

And Dann would have conceded a penalty

Not necessarily. Who knows what would have happened if Knockaert had correctly been sent off.

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

..You basically just summed up the reason for it and how it would help us, so why do you not like it on the whole?
It will rid the league of Watford.

The game would have been a lot different, they would have had to change their attacking ideas utterly, we probably still wouldn't have scored in open play because they would have defended us to death and they would've booted the ball up field even more and if Murray (hadn't been subbed with the sending off) had been there with Tomkins farting about they could have caused even more problems!

Ten men ruins football, instead the team who is fouled should be allowed to bring on another player so 12 against 11 and that will not ruin it for the fans.