You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Empire Journalism: Venezuela, the US and John McCa
November 22 2024 8.13am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Empire Journalism: Venezuela, the US and John McCa

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

Bert the Head Flag Epsom 07 Sep 18 10.54am Send a Private Message to Bert the Head Add Bert the Head as a friend


Media Lens has produced an interesting article on the recent mainstream reporting of Venezuela and John McCain. For anyone interesting in the way news is framed for social consumption, it is worth reading.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 07 Sep 18 7.48pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

I read the article and found it interesting. However, I find it biased in its treatment of the US. It's overly simplistic to the point of agreeing with people who clearly have silly agendas of their own.
Undoubtedly the US has a big part to play in the state of Venezuela, however, clearly the Venezuelan government has played a large part in the country's demise.
As for McCain - when he bombed Vietnam he was following orders and probably believed he was doing the right thing. Obviously he stuck by his convictions. He is basically being labelled a murderer by some here. That is too much for me - especially as he only died recently.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bert the Head Flag Epsom 08 Sep 18 10.37pm Send a Private Message to Bert the Head Add Bert the Head as a friend

I am very grateful you took the time to read the piece.

The article does acknowledge the role of the failures of the Venezuelan government. It points out that the role of the USA sanctions has not been covered in the reporting - which you yourself admit is important

I cannot see how the article is simplistic when the point is that the coverage has omitted a point that you agree. The point of the article is that this important dynamic is missing.

Regarding the death of Mr McCann. He is responsible for a lot of people dying and I have have very little sympathy with that line of argument that he was just following orders.

Edited by Bert the Head (09 Sep 2018 12.16am)

Edited by Bert the Head (09 Sep 2018 12.17am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 09 Sep 18 1.21am Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Bert the Head

I am very grateful you took the time to read the piece.

The article does acknowledge the role of the failures of the Venezuelan government. It points out that the role of the USA sanctions has not been covered in the reporting - which you yourself admit is important

I cannot see how the article is simplistic when the point is that the coverage has omitted a point that you agree. The point of the article is that this important dynamic is missing.

Regarding the death of Mr McCann. He is responsible for a lot of people dying and I have have very little sympathy with that line of argument that he was just following orders.

Edited by Bert the Head (09 Sep 2018 12.16am)

Edited by Bert the Head (09 Sep 2018 12.17am)

Yes I heard Arfur wasn't too happy....

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 09 Sep 18 1.16pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

This article seems to want to counter the notion of fake news with its term Empire Journalism. I can't really see it catching on but it is good for thought. Can hardly say that the USA is always viewed positively by the press and never criticised. For a silly example there are also news agencies such as RT, Al Jazeera and even news stations such as Euronews. These do not promote a US agenda.
As an ex-forces member myself, soldiers who killed people can hardly be considered murderers, as long as they followed the appropriate rules of engagement. I doubt McCain went around cheering as he bombed the hell out of North Vietnam.
By this type of argument every RAF pilot from WWII is a murderer. They were doing a job, which in hindsight may or may not have been the ethical thing to do. However, refuse to do it and they would have been court-martialled and shot. But most, like McCain, probably genuinely thought they were doing the right thing.
Without being rude or personal, didn't any of your family fight in any of the wars? Mine did; they killed people and they are not murderers, although they had regrets.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 09 Sep 18 8.07pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

This article seems to want to counter the notion of fake news with its term Empire Journalism. I can't really see it catching on but it is good for thought. Can hardly say that the USA is always viewed positively by the press and never criticised. For a silly example there are also news agencies such as RT, Al Jazeera and even news stations such as Euronews. These do not promote a US agenda.
As an ex-forces member myself, soldiers who killed people can hardly be considered murderers, as long as they followed the appropriate rules of engagement. I doubt McCain went around cheering as he bombed the hell out of North Vietnam.
By this type of argument every RAF pilot from WWII is a murderer. They were doing a job, which in hindsight may or may not have been the ethical thing to do. However, refuse to do it and they would have been court-martialled and shot. But most, like McCain, probably genuinely thought they were doing the right thing.
Without being rude or personal, didn't any of your family fight in any of the wars? Mine did; they killed people and they are not murderers, although they had regrets.

By this type of argument every RAF pilot from WWII is a murderer.

My uncle, a retired army major, was disgusted at the allied bombing of innocent civilans, so were many people and they were the only service not to receive a medal.

It is very difficult to point the finger and say they are definitely still doing it, as they always parade the 'national security' lie.

Why does it not concern us more, do you want this sort of thing in your name?

Surely not.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 09 Sep 18 8.42pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

By this type of argument every RAF pilot from WWII is a murderer.

My uncle, a retired army major, was disgusted at the allied bombing of innocent civilans, so were many people and they were the only service not to receive a medal.

It is very difficult to point the finger and say they are definitely still doing it, as they always parade the 'national security' lie.

Why does it not concern us more, do you want this sort of thing in your name?

Surely not.


Which service didn't receive a medal?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 09 Sep 18 8.49pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Bomber Harris' tactics are often debated but I'm sorry to say that I don't believe RAF pilots/ crew are murderers for carrying out bombing missions.
Nor would I call a recently deceased politician a murderer - unless I truly knew it.
You are one of the not in my name people fair enough. However, your retired relative, as a soldier should realise that it wasn't only the RAF that killed civilians. Artillery and small arms did exactly the same (i.e. killed civilians) on a smaller scale. Was an artillery man a murderer if his shell accidently hit civilians? - I don't think so.
People in combat are not murderers unless they start shooting innocent people knowingly - which is the same distinction for civilians too when you consider it. You need mens rea (intent) to murder.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 09 Sep 18 8.56pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Bomber Harris' tactics are often debated but I'm sorry to say that I don't believe RAF pilots/ crew are murderers for carrying out bombing missions.
Nor would I call a recently deceased politician a murderer - unless I truly knew it.
You are one of the not in my name people fair enough. However, your retired relative, as a soldier should realise that it wasn't only the RAF that killed civilians. Artillery and small arms did exactly the same (i.e. killed civilians) on a smaller scale. Was an artillery man a murderer if his shell accidently hit civilians? - I don't think so.
People in combat are not murderers unless they start shooting innocent people knowingly - which is the same distinction for civilians too when you consider it. You need mens rea (intent) to murder.

How do you regard the actions of the 'coalition'?

Have they not bombed and maimed innocent peoples particularly Libya Syria Yemen?

What democratic control are they under?

And how will those people avenge it, surely by terrorism on our streets.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 09 Sep 18 9.57pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

How do you regard the actions of the 'coalition'?

Have they not bombed and maimed innocent peoples particularly Libya Syria Yemen?

What democratic control are they under?

And how will those people avenge it, surely by terrorism on our streets.

The point being
Do you beleive they should avenge it?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 10 Sep 18 11.03am Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by chris123

Which service didn't receive a medal?

Bomber Command was the only branch of the services denied a campaign medal.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 10 Sep 18 11.21am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Bomber Command was the only branch of the services denied a campaign medal.

Many thanks for clearing that up.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Empire Journalism: Venezuela, the US and John McCa