Surprisingly this thread isn't starting with a question on sexual urges.
The Paralympics categorises athletes, depending on which part of the body has been impacted. e.g., legs arms, eyes
I was watching the legless ice-hockey the other day as they went around the rink on sledges. It was obvious after a while, that those with disabled full legs, not only had to pull more weight around with their arms, but they also had the biggest turning circle because their sledges were longest.
Those with both legs missing had a ridiculously tight turning circle and also less weight to drag.

So, my question is this:

If you were a disabled athlete, would you increase your disability (e.g. surgically remove non-functioning legs) in order to gain a competitive advantage ?

I disengage, I turn the page.

Did I wake up in an alternative universe this morning?

It's starting to feel a bit Rick and Morty.

LOL, You see, this is what happens when we win a game.

If we had lost yesterday, we would have some sensible Parish out, Benteke is sh!te, why didn't we buy in January type threads.

When we beat Liverpool 5-0 next week, this site will turn into an episode of Eurotrash...

"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"

Stan Laurel

in the world of the one-legged the legless man is king, used to be the other way around, some female amputees have said that sex without legs makes penetration less problematic. don't know about ice hockey, they probably should have all no-legs or all one-leg matches, might not be enough players though, so we're stuck with the legless having an unfair advantage but perhaps we should not begrudge them this.