This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mr Palaceman 16 Mar 18 9.09pm | |
---|---|
Get over it... I was excited when he was appointed, I can't lie. I was shocked when he was sacked so soon but now I can't wait until he gets another job. Maybe then he will shut the h£ll up. BTW, This is not a "told you so" thread, or an excuse for hol'ers to bash others. It's that for me, this guy is showing a distinct lack of class. I wish we could say that we had dodged a bullet. But he just keeps trying to reload. He's starting to make Pulis look like a diplomat.
"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead" Stan Laurel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 16 Mar 18 9.13pm | |
---|---|
One of the hallmarks of a true complete and utter bellend is that he can't stop talking about how everything s*** that happens to him is someone else's fault. He was total toilet. What happens to managers who are total toilet? They get sacked.
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rachid Rachid Rachid 16 Mar 18 9.16pm | |
---|---|
Can't stab someone in the back if you've not formed a rapport in the first place.Typical dutch deflection and bulls***.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mwncisee Middlesbrough 16 Mar 18 9.26pm | |
---|---|
Recently in my work I have been asked to head a project in which colleagues will have to alter the way they think and go about there work. Have been supported by an external agency in this and it is very much accepted when doing this that your workforce can be split into a quarter who will embrace a new project a quarter who will be avidly against it and the remaining half will be unsure. Good managers don't actually bother trying to persuade the 1/4 who are avidly against. You will never persuade them. But by getting the unsures on board you have 3/4 of your workforce behind you and it is through them tne last 1/4 become engaged. Simple undersranding of basic management and FdB's comments in the article speak more of his dailure to be able to manage even at thus basic level.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 16 Mar 18 9.31pm | |
---|---|
He's gone, let him go
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
merganser 16 Mar 18 11.06pm | |
---|---|
Would his pay-off have included a confidentiality clause?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
FairweatherEagle London 16 Mar 18 11.17pm | |
---|---|
He's right about being naive though, by the time he realised 433 was the best system, it was too late.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 16 Mar 18 11.44pm | |
---|---|
He's an arrogant fool. It takes time to do what he wanted unless you have hundreds of millions. He incidentally said every prem club spends lots of money. He came out with all the 'virtual' crap and lies and very soon after made radical changes which would never work so soon. He put us at risk, didn't give a xh1t that we were and from comments made like ''Crystal Palace this year, who knows next year'', the long term project was bullsh1t as well. Goodbye w@nker. Glad Parish sacked him. Should've been sooner, or better, never hired in the first place. Edited by Rudi Hedman (17 Mar 2018 12.03am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
tonymikejoe UK 16 Mar 18 11.50pm | |
---|---|
Here is the rest of what Frank had to say about CPFC :
“That’s why I played five in the back, 5-4-1, very defensive,” he says. “Not my kind of idea, but necessary with the players that I had at that moment. You can say, why didn't you start with 4-3-3? No. For example, [Wilfried] Zaha is the most important player at the club. You want him at his strength, not always running after his wing-back. And defensively we were very vulnerable, so OK, we’ll put one extra. Because it was Frank De Boer, everybody thought it was 3-4-3 and too offensive, but it wasn’t Frank De Boer at all.” Palace’s start to the season, though abject, wasn’t always as nightmarish as subsequently portrayed. They came close to getting a point at Anfield, and despite going down 1-0 to Burnley at Turf Moor in De Boer’s last game, there were signs that the team was finally beginning to gel. “We were really dominating Burnley at their ground,” De Boer says. “Scott Dann had a big chance at the end. Unbelievable.”
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 17 Mar 18 12.08am | |
---|---|
It was 3-4-3 to begin with vs Huddersfield. Did it change to 5-4-1 vs Liverpool really because he had to use Luca properly and Wilf wasn't available? I can't remember now but the intention was 3-4-3. It's all immaterial now. If he'd just got himself comfortable and moved a few out and in each window and consulted Sammy Lee more he may have done well, if his character would allow him.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 17 Mar 18 12.23am | |
---|---|
Nevertheless I think 4 games is not enough but that's the pressure of the PL for you. The poll on this site reflected that as well I think by about 10% feeling he should have got longer. One good result, a decision going your way it can all change so quick.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Holmesdale 1989 17 Mar 18 12.40am | |
---|---|
A good few players did spit their dummies of of their prams. We're in this mess by certain traitors.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.