This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
matt_himself Matataland 15 Jan 18 8.15am | |
---|---|
This is big news, Carillion are a huge construction company and facilities management operation: The government will get involved as Carillion touch rail, PFI and outsourced services. Thousands of jobs are affected as are pensions. Looks like they overreached themselves by taking on risky contracts.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 15 Jan 18 8.51am | |
---|---|
The knock on effect will be terrible as there are thousands of subcontractors big and small that rely on Carillion and many will go bust themselves as a result
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 15 Jan 18 9.12am | |
---|---|
Much of this is still a concequence of the 2007 crash. In order to survive in the 5 years after it they took on many long term contracts at highly competitive rates. These were risky but necessary to keep them afloat at the time. There's still a staff shortage in the construction industry which has Many government organisations have realised they are now getting a great deal from their longer term contracts so have extended them as much as they possibly can. None of this seems to be being reported as it doesn't go along with the Union's argument about private sector companies making big profits of the government. Particularly from PFI's. Clearly Carillon haven't made these big profits and the banks they took loans of for the PFI's are now closing in. There a few other factors at play. Such as clients in the middle East refusing to pay or delaying payment because they are oily gits. There are still many other big players and rapidly expanding companies who'd be looking at taking on their contracts. It will probably cause some delays and price increases but should be too much of a long term issue.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 15 Jan 18 9.41am | |
---|---|
Hmmm..... made £146.7 million profit before taxation in 2016, increased the divided by 1% to 18.45 pps and totally ignored the enormous black hole that comprises their pension fund yet again......(and this is similar to year after year of operations)
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
.TUX. 15 Jan 18 9.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Hmmm..... made £146.7 million profit before taxation in 2016, increased the divided by 1% to 18.45 pps and totally ignored the enormous black hole that comprises their pension fund yet again......(and this is similar to year after year of operations)
Agreed.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 15 Jan 18 11.47am | |
---|---|
Shareholders normally don't worry that much about dividends if the share price is rising. A lot of the time larger dividends are paid out in an attempt to artificially boost share prices. Out of £5.2bn revenue their profit was 3% which is pretty poor considering the risk they carry, even then it was 1% more than the previous year.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Barcelona Based Fan No longer Barcelona, now living in... 15 Jan 18 12.00pm | |
---|---|
Weren't they supposed to be the chosen company to build our new main stand?
TaxiMark |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 15 Jan 18 12.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Barcelona Based Fan
Weren't they supposed to be the chosen company to build our new main stand? Surely it's Aron Noades' building company?
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 15 Jan 18 12.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Hmmm..... made £146.7 million profit before taxation in 2016, increased the divided by 1% to 18.45 pps and totally ignored the enormous black hole that comprises their pension fund yet again......(and this is similar to year after year of operations)
Chris Grayling is being made to look more of an imbecile week by week. First the East Coast mainline debacle and now this. The man should lose his job over this one. He's cost us taxpayers a lot of money with his negligence.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 15 Jan 18 12.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
Shareholders normally don't worry that much about dividends if the share price is rising. A lot of the time larger dividends are paid out in an attempt to artificially boost share prices. Out of £5.2bn revenue their profit was 3% which is pretty poor considering the risk they carry, even then it was 1% more than the previous year. Cash is king. 3% net net profit not that bad depending on industry and the proportion of fixed and variable costs. Some businesses are high volume low margin. In this case though the writing was on the wall. The government have really not done their homework on this one (again) and I hope there is an inquiry into the numerous state contracts awarded to Carillion in recent years.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 15 Jan 18 1.57pm | |
---|---|
This is why the monopolies and mergers (now competition) commission should stop letting large companies consume so many of their competitors. It sounds even worse when you realise that Carillion going into liquidation, could read as "Tarmac, Wimpey, Alfred McAlpine, Mowlem, John Laing etc have gone into liquidation." I feel sorry for the subcontractors, they'll lose the most.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 15 Jan 18 5.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Hmmm..... made £146.7 million profit before taxation in 2016, increased the divided by 1% to 18.45 pps and totally ignored the enormous black hole that comprises their pension fund yet again......(and this is similar to year after year of operations)
100% correct. It shows the issues of relying solely on S&P ratings and similar when valuing companies. Discussions have been ongoing for years on this subject an normally kicked into touch by a mixture of the Tory Government and big business. Some of these executives must be criminally negligeable, but they always be found to be unfit, naive, mentally challenged after the fact.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.