This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
slubglurge welling 10 Dec 17 11.59am | |
---|---|
People calling for Wilf to be charged for diving today including Eddie Howe. As far as i am concerned there is no case to answer completely different to Niasse and also yesterday Varney did a pretty good one.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Slimey Toad Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 10 Dec 17 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by slubglurge
People calling for Wilf to be charged for diving today including Eddie Howe. As far as i am concerned there is no case to answer completely different to Niasse and also yesterday Varney did a pretty good one. Reg did a pretty good clippie?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 10 Dec 17 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by slubglurge
People calling for Wilf to be charged for diving today including Eddie Howe. As far as i am concerned there is no case to answer completely different to Niasse and also yesterday Varney did a pretty good one.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Aolcpfc Finchley, London 10 Dec 17 12.09pm | |
---|---|
Howe may well be trying to deflect attention from his own part in his team's training ground deception tactics. I speak here about Defoe's first goal in which Howe's team practised holding onto Defoe's marker. King holding onto Jeff Schlupp. King and Defoe should be charged for deceiving the referee.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 10 Dec 17 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
That means Vardy wouldn't be available when they play us, zat right? Trouble is of course that Vardy will only get a ban if he actually decived the ref, whereas Wilf can be charged with Having Curly Hair and Thick Lips, or with Looking at Me in a Funny Way. Edited by chateauferret (10 Dec 2017 1.37pm)
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jamesrichards8 10 Dec 17 1.56pm | |
---|---|
from what i’ve seen neither penalty looked like a dive. both clear cut
When you’re knocked on your back and your life’s a flop... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
adrian b Landrindod, Wales 10 Dec 17 2.06pm | |
---|---|
And now someone saying another missed foul should be checked out. Where is this all going? I suppose the biggest point is the result will not be altered. Why waste our time?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dicky boy Rainham.........Kent 10 Dec 17 2.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
That means Vardy wouldn't be available when they play us, zat right? Trouble is of course that Vardy will only get a ban if he actually decived the ref, whereas Wilf can be charged with Having Curly Hair and Thick Lips, or with Looking at Me in a Funny Way. Edited by chateauferret (10 Dec 2017 1.37pm) Good old Not the nine o'clock news
ROY HODGSON's RED''BLUE ARMY Ohhhh Lukaaaa ooooooh.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 10 Dec 17 2.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jamesrichards8
from what i’ve seen neither penalty looked like a dive. both clear cut BOTH penalties. And weren't there siren voices on here saying penalties are never awarded when Zaha is brought down in the box ?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dangermouse Hastings 10 Dec 17 4.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
BOTH penalties. And weren't there siren voices on here saying penalties are never awarded when Zaha is brought down in the box ? Can you remember the last one? He's been denied so many it's ridiculous, so don't get all high and mighty cos a ref actually did his job for once. In fact he did his job laughably at times, terrible performance.
That's Life |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Direwolf Lincoln 10 Dec 17 5.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dangermouse
Can you remember the last one? He's been denied so many it's ridiculous, so don't get all high and mighty cos a ref actually did his job for once. In fact he did his job laughably at times, terrible performance. Don't you have to deceive the referee? That foul was just bloody obvious and completely unseen by any official on the pitch apparently.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dangermouse Hastings 10 Dec 17 5.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Direwolf
Don't you have to deceive the referee? That foul was just bloody obvious and completely unseen by any official on the pitch apparently. Exactly. Deceiving the ref is the crime. How you do it is irrelevant, surely.
That's Life |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.