Pathetic

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Pathetic

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 1 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 03 Nov 17 11.59am
[Link] Remember when it was promised the UK would take in 3000 refugee children. Well we've only taken in 300 so far. Campaigners have lost a court battle to force the Government to take the number of child refugees it promised to under the Dubs Amendment.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 03 Nov 17 11.59am

[Link]

Remember when it was promised the UK would take in 3000 refugee children. Well we've only taken in 300 so far.

Campaigners have lost a court battle to force the Government to take the number of child refugees it promised to under the Dubs Amendment.

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 03 Nov 17 12.05pm
The oh so proud of their Christian British roots patriots will be happy. Why the hell should we take orphaned 10 year olds? That's just not on. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 03 Nov 17 12.05pm

The oh so proud of their Christian British roots patriots will be happy. Why the hell should we take orphaned 10 year olds? That's just not on.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

simlaboy coulsdon 03 Nov 17 12.12pm
Because they’re really 28
Alert a moderator to this post

simlaboy

coulsdon 03 Nov 17 12.12pm

Because they’re really 28

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 03 Nov 17 12.16pm
Good. This country is overcrowded enough already. As I have said before. This world's future will see an endless and ever increasing flow of refugees. We cannot and should not save them all. We have to have a sensible policy going forward and one that considers the future of British citizens first. That is the duty of our government. Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.26pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

03 Nov 17 12.16pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Good. This country is overcrowded enough already.

As I have said before. This world's future will see an endless and ever increasing flow of refugees. We cannot and should not save them all. We have to have a sensible policy going forward and one that considers the future of British citizens first. That is the duty of our government.

Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.26pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 03 Nov 17 12.22pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Good. This country is overcrowded enough already. As I have said before. This world's future will see an endless and ever increasing flow of refugees. We cannot an should not save them all. We have to have a sensible policy going forward and one that considers the future of British citizens first. That is the duty of our government. Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.18pm) Hrolf You and I are 'Birds' on the same twig.
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 03 Nov 17 12.22pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Good. This country is overcrowded enough already.

As I have said before. This world's future will see an endless and ever increasing flow of refugees. We cannot an should not save them all. We have to have a sensible policy going forward and one that considers the future of British citizens first. That is the duty of our government.

Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.18pm)

Hrolf

You and I are 'Birds' on the same twig.

Alert a moderator to this post

Rubin 03 Nov 17 12.26pm
Originally posted by nickgusset [Link] Remember when it was promised the UK would take in 3000 refugee children. Well we've only taken in 300 so far. Campaigners have lost a court battle to force the Government to take the number of child refugees it promised to under the Dubs Amendment. Have you ever watched this, Nick? [Link] Not completely relevant to refugees, but really brings home the reality of why immigration of those from 'poor' countries to the West will never solve anything, and will in some cases, damage the countries that they're leaving. Edited by Rubin (03 Nov 2017 12.27pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Rubin

03 Nov 17 12.26pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

[Link]

Remember when it was promised the UK would take in 3000 refugee children. Well we've only taken in 300 so far.

Campaigners have lost a court battle to force the Government to take the number of child refugees it promised to under the Dubs Amendment.

Have you ever watched this, Nick?

[Link]

Not completely relevant to refugees, but really brings home the reality of why immigration of those from 'poor' countries to the West will never solve anything, and will in some cases, damage the countries that they're leaving.

Edited by Rubin (03 Nov 2017 12.27pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol 03 Nov 17 12.35pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Good. This country is overcrowded enough already. As I have said before. This world's future will see an endless and ever increasing flow of refugees. We cannot and should not save them all. We have to have a sensible policy going forward and one that considers the future of British citizens first. That is the duty of our government. Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.26pm) largely thanks to our own foreign policy and creating instability in the middle east Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah
Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol

03 Nov 17 12.35pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Good. This country is overcrowded enough already.

Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.26pm)

largely thanks to our own foreign policy and creating instability in the middle east

Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert a moderator to this post

Tom-the-eagle Croydon 03 Nov 17 12.35pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 The oh so proud of their Christian British roots patriots will be happy. Why the hell should we take orphaned 10 year olds? That's just not on. At one point the influx of immigrants got so bad that many of the white middle classes left South London and headed for places such as Dorset just to escape. "It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit
Alert a moderator to this post

Tom-the-eagle

Croydon 03 Nov 17 12.35pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

The oh so proud of their Christian British roots patriots will be happy. Why the hell should we take orphaned 10 year olds? That's just not on.

At one point the influx of immigrants got so bad that many of the white middle classes left South London and headed for places such as Dorset just to escape.

"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 03 Nov 17 12.39pm
Originally posted by Rubin Have you ever watched this, Nick? [Link] Not completely relevant to refugees, but really brings home the reality of why immigration of those from 'poor' countries to the West will never solve anything, and will in some cases, damage the countries that they're leaving. Edited by Rubin (03 Nov 2017 12.27pm) I appreciate the nub of the clip. Always been concerned about brain drain, although if we haven't got the qualified people here to do it. Trying to cut immigration numbers quickly will have to many negative consequences. Making immigrants feel unwelcome through part of the National vernacular doesn't help either. We're hemorrhaging qualified people who are returning to their country of origin. Fact is we don't have enough qualified people of our own. Sort that out then begin to reduce immigration. This thread is about refugee children who often have no family, have seen things you and I couldn't dream of. 300 is a paltry amount. 3000 is nothing really. Things like this make me a little ashamed of this country.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 03 Nov 17 12.39pm

Originally posted by Rubin

Have you ever watched this, Nick?

[Link]

Edited by Rubin (03 Nov 2017 12.27pm)

I appreciate the nub of the clip. Always been concerned about brain drain, although if we haven't got the qualified people here to do it.
Trying to cut immigration numbers quickly will have to many negative consequences. Making immigrants feel unwelcome through part of the National vernacular doesn't help either. We're hemorrhaging qualified people who are returning to their country of origin. Fact is we don't have enough qualified people of our own. Sort that out then begin to reduce immigration.

This thread is about refugee children who often have no family, have seen things you and I couldn't dream of.
300 is a paltry amount. 3000 is nothing really.
Things like this make me a little ashamed of this country.

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 03 Nov 17 12.46pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Good. This country is overcrowded enough already. As I have said before. This world's future will see an endless and ever increasing flow of refugees. We cannot and should not save them all. We have to have a sensible policy going forward and one that considers the future of British citizens first. That is the duty of our government. Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.26pm) Which is precisely why a decision was taken that to admit 3,000 youngsters (a v small number) was appropriate.
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

03 Nov 17 12.46pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Good. This country is overcrowded enough already.

Decisions have to be made with heads and not hearts that is what we pay politicians for.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (03 Nov 2017 12.26pm)

Which is precisely why a decision was taken that to admit 3,000 youngsters (a v small number) was appropriate.

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 03 Nov 17 12.48pm
Originally posted by Willo Hrolf You and I are 'Birds' on the same twig. Careful.The big problem with birds on twigs is that they tend to sh@t on unsuspecting people passing near them
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

03 Nov 17 12.48pm

Originally posted by Willo

Hrolf

You and I are 'Birds' on the same twig.

Careful.The big problem with birds on twigs is that they tend to sh@t on unsuspecting people passing near them

Alert a moderator to this post

Tom-the-eagle Croydon 03 Nov 17 12.49pm
Originally posted by nickgusset I appreciate the nub of the clip. Always been concerned about brain drain, although if we haven't got the qualified people here to do it. Trying to cut immigration numbers quickly will have to many negative consequences. Making immigrants feel unwelcome through part of the National vernacular doesn't help either. We're hemorrhaging qualified people who are returning to their country of origin. Fact is we don't have enough qualified people of our own. Sort that out then begin to reduce immigration. This thread is about refugee children who often have no family, have seen things you and I couldn't dream of. 300 is a paltry amount. 3000 is nothing really. Things like this make me a little ashamed of this country. Like what exactly? the only possible negative I could think of would be a shortage of skilled workers to fill specialist vacancies however this could easily be eradicating by issuing visas to skilled applicants so please tell me Nick as I am genuinely interested, what would these negative consequences be that you speak of? Edited by Tom-the-eagle (03 Nov 2017 12.49pm) "It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit
Alert a moderator to this post

Tom-the-eagle

Croydon 03 Nov 17 12.49pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I appreciate the nub of the clip. Always been concerned about brain drain, although if we haven't got the qualified people here to do it.
Trying to cut immigration numbers quickly will have to many negative consequences. Making immigrants feel unwelcome through part of the National vernacular doesn't help either. We're hemorrhaging qualified people who are returning to their country of origin. Fact is we don't have enough qualified people of our own. Sort that out then begin to reduce immigration.

Like what exactly? the only possible negative I could think of would be a shortage of skilled workers to fill specialist vacancies however this could easily be eradicating by issuing visas to skilled applicants so please tell me Nick as I am genuinely interested, what would these negative consequences be that you speak of?

Edited by Tom-the-eagle (03 Nov 2017 12.49pm)

"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 1 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Pathetic

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors