You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Confederate Statues
November 22 2024 3.15pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Confederate Statues

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 49 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

  

Romford-Eagle Flag Romford 16 Aug 17 12.57am Send a Private Message to Romford-Eagle Add Romford-Eagle as a friend


It worries me to see these historical statues, which are part of America's short history being torn down because certain people think they depict racism, and apart from the KKK nobody blinks an eye, can you imagine if statues of Martin Luther-King or Nelson Mandela were torn down, there would be murders in the streets..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 16 Aug 17 1.42am Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Originally posted by Romford-Eagle


It worries me to see these historical statues, which are part of America's short history being torn down because certain people think they depict racism, and apart from the KKK nobody blinks an eye, can you imagine if statues of Martin Luther-King or Nelson Mandela were torn down, there would be murders in the streets..

Well, they are a visible depiction of people who fought to preserve slavery. It is about time they came down. It is no different than pulling down statues of Soviet leaders in Estonia, or British ones in Ireland or India.

[Link]

For those who don't think it was about slavery, read the reasoning of the Confederate Vice President as to the causes of the war.

By the way, there have been loads of murders committed by the KKK for their cause so I am not sure what your point is.

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 17 2.01am

Originally posted by NickinOX

Well, they are a visible depiction of people who fought to preserve slavery. It is about time they came down. It is no different than pulling down statues of Soviet leaders in Estonia, or British ones in Ireland or India.

[Link]

For those who don't think it was about slavery, read the reasoning of the Confederate Vice President as to the causes of the war.

By the way, there have been loads of murders committed by the KKK for their cause so I am not sure what your point is.

You don't want the danger of airbrushing history though. The statue also serves as a reminder that Lee was on the losing side and his vile racist ideology defeated.

Out of interest, is it going to be replaced with a statue of Trump. Or Miley Cyrus.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 16 Aug 17 2.46am Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

You don't want the danger of airbrushing history though. The statue also serves as a reminder that Lee was on the losing side and his vile racist ideology defeated.

Out of interest, is it going to be replaced with a statue of Trump. Or Miley Cyrus.

Absolutely. However, if they want to put the statues in a museum or park with some proper interpretation to educate people, I would have no problem with that: and that is what is reported to be happening in a number of places.

I would also point out there are loads of these statues of losers, and I doubt there are proportionately as many from the winning Federal side. Unfortunately, much of this relates to the myth of the good cause and the statues themselves are part of an attempt to air brush history to make it seem as thought the South was right, and the South won the moral argument. Which in some ways it did if you look how long it took for things to significantly change.


Edited by NickinOX (16 Aug 2017 2.47am)

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnno42000 Flag 16 Aug 17 5.47am Send a Private Message to johnno42000 Add johnno42000 as a friend

I wonder if the statues of a vile slave owning president will be torn down, the traitor George Washington.

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dave58 Flag Ipswich 16 Aug 17 6.52am Send a Private Message to Dave58 Add Dave58 as a friend

Yep Jefferson and Washington could come down. Trump predicted that yesterday. I wonder how that's works with Mount Rushmore?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 16 Aug 17 8.18am

When you start pulling down statues that you disapprove of, it is just a step to listing books that you will burn. Should we destroy all the film footage and photographs of Hitler? Trying to destroy or change history is a Stalinist activity. After all, the logic is exactly the same as that which ISIS employs when it blows up ancient buildings and statues that is disapproves of.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Islington Eagle Flag North of the River 16 Aug 17 8.54am Send a Private Message to Islington Eagle Add Islington Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

When you start pulling down statues that you disapprove of, it is just a step to listing books that you will burn. Should we destroy all the film footage and photographs of Hitler? Trying to destroy or change history is a Stalinist activity. After all, the logic is exactly the same as that which ISIS employs when it blows up ancient buildings and statues that is disapproves of.

Really? So Iraq should have statues of Saddam Hussein all over the place, India and Ireland should have British Generals in Main streets? Hitler should be in every town square. This is just plain nonsense.
The generals and leaders of the successionist southern states have no place being celebrated in a modern US. Sure teach the history of how a civil war was fought in the US and the 100's of thousands that died in a brutal conflict that sought to preserve the economic system that existed in southern america at that time. The rebel states have long since lost the moral argument and preserving statues of its leaders without doubt still gives voice to the confederate battle flag waving racists that want to turn back time to that of slavery and white supremacy.

The trump comparisons with Jefferson and Washington - that they were slave owners - is valid BUT the distinction here is what is it that their statues are there to celebrate. In this case they were heroes of the American Revolution and founding fathers of modern america. If you take the view that the American Revolution was a great achievement and that the writing of the declaration of independence was an historic moment then having statues to these men to celebrate their contribution is valid DESPITE their other faults. THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE TO ROBERT E LEE - A great general he undeniably was but he was fighting for a cause that nearly everyone does not support any more.

ISIS do not pull down statues and ancient buildings to re-write history rather they believe that images of god is idolatry and blasphemy - in almost the same way that 16th century protestants removed icons and statues from Churches.

 


Palace Fan

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Aug 17 8.57am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Surely it all depends on the context of where a statue is placed and the story which is told on the plinth it stands on? If it glorifies something now regarded as evil then it encourages those who wish to perpetuate that evil. If it is there as a historical monument and part of the story of transition to a wiser world then it's fine.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 16 Aug 17 10.13am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Pulling down statues is provocative. It is also another example of favouring the minority over the majority.
I know that there are liberals in the South who would approve of this as well as all those 'rednecks' but many people are still proud of their heritage, even if some aspects of that do not fit well with current political correctness.
History has happened, it can't be changed or airbrushed. It should serve as a reminder of reality over revisionism.
People need to move on and stop harbouring old resentments. Removing statues of historical figures that some revere will achieve the opposite.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 16 Aug 17 10.31am

Originally posted by Islington Eagle

Really? So Iraq should have statues of Saddam Hussein all over the place, India and Ireland should have British Generals in Main streets? Hitler should be in every town square. This is just plain nonsense.
The generals and leaders of the successionist southern states have no place being celebrated in a modern US. Sure teach the history of how a civil war was fought in the US and the 100's of thousands that died in a brutal conflict that sought to preserve the economic system that existed in southern america at that time. The rebel states have long since lost the moral argument and preserving statues of its leaders without doubt still gives voice to the confederate battle flag waving racists that want to turn back time to that of slavery and white supremacy.

The trump comparisons with Jefferson and Washington - that they were slave owners - is valid BUT the distinction here is what is it that their statues are there to celebrate. In this case they were heroes of the American Revolution and founding fathers of modern america. If you take the view that the American Revolution was a great achievement and that the writing of the declaration of independence was an historic moment then having statues to these men to celebrate their contribution is valid DESPITE their other faults. THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE TO ROBERT E LEE - A great general he undeniably was but he was fighting for a cause that nearly everyone does not support any more.

ISIS do not pull down statues and ancient buildings to re-write history rather they believe that images of god is idolatry and blasphemy - in almost the same way that 16th century protestants removed icons and statues from Churches.

Where did I say this? Is is just plain nonsense for you to suggest that I did. Would you destroy all images, film etc of Hitler, after all most of them would have bee created to celebrate him.
Indeed ISIS do destroy things they deem to be blasphemous, just as the left is trying to destroy things they deem to be blasphemous against their beliefs. Do you have a list of books that you want burned?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 16 Aug 17 10.31am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by NickinOX

Well, they are a visible depiction of people who fought to preserve slavery. It is about time they came down. It is no different than pulling down statues of Soviet leaders in Estonia, or British ones in Ireland or India.

[Link]

For those who don't think it was about slavery, read the reasoning of the Confederate Vice President as to the causes of the war.

By the way, there have been loads of murders committed by the KKK for their cause so I am not sure what your point is.

The civil war was primarily about slavery...well, to be precise the money from it. But it wasn't only about slavery and symbols like General Lee came to represent the independence of the south. But there is no doubt that if Lincoln hadn't been elected president the war wouldn't have happened.

It's one eyed to suggest that a statute of General Lee is just about slavery for everyone. I was annoyed about the bringing down of this statue as well and I don't support slavery at all. Plenty of people died on the confederate side and most of them didn't own slaves.

It's air brushing of history, it's what extremists do when they seek to make society in their image.

Not good.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Aug 2017 10.36am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 49 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Confederate Statues