This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Romford-Eagle Romford 16 Aug 17 12.57am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NickinOX Sailing country. 16 Aug 17 1.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Romford-Eagle
Well, they are a visible depiction of people who fought to preserve slavery. It is about time they came down. It is no different than pulling down statues of Soviet leaders in Estonia, or British ones in Ireland or India. For those who don't think it was about slavery, read the reasoning of the Confederate Vice President as to the causes of the war. By the way, there have been loads of murders committed by the KKK for their cause so I am not sure what your point is.
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 17 2.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NickinOX
Well, they are a visible depiction of people who fought to preserve slavery. It is about time they came down. It is no different than pulling down statues of Soviet leaders in Estonia, or British ones in Ireland or India. For those who don't think it was about slavery, read the reasoning of the Confederate Vice President as to the causes of the war. By the way, there have been loads of murders committed by the KKK for their cause so I am not sure what your point is. You don't want the danger of airbrushing history though. The statue also serves as a reminder that Lee was on the losing side and his vile racist ideology defeated. Out of interest, is it going to be replaced with a statue of Trump. Or Miley Cyrus.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NickinOX Sailing country. 16 Aug 17 2.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
You don't want the danger of airbrushing history though. The statue also serves as a reminder that Lee was on the losing side and his vile racist ideology defeated. Out of interest, is it going to be replaced with a statue of Trump. Or Miley Cyrus. Absolutely. However, if they want to put the statues in a museum or park with some proper interpretation to educate people, I would have no problem with that: and that is what is reported to be happening in a number of places. I would also point out there are loads of these statues of losers, and I doubt there are proportionately as many from the winning Federal side. Unfortunately, much of this relates to the myth of the good cause and the statues themselves are part of an attempt to air brush history to make it seem as thought the South was right, and the South won the moral argument. Which in some ways it did if you look how long it took for things to significantly change.
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 16 Aug 17 5.47am | |
---|---|
I wonder if the statues of a vile slave owning president will be torn down, the traitor George Washington.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dave58 Ipswich 16 Aug 17 6.52am | |
---|---|
Yep Jefferson and Washington could come down. Trump predicted that yesterday. I wonder how that's works with Mount Rushmore?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 16 Aug 17 8.18am | |
---|---|
When you start pulling down statues that you disapprove of, it is just a step to listing books that you will burn. Should we destroy all the film footage and photographs of Hitler? Trying to destroy or change history is a Stalinist activity. After all, the logic is exactly the same as that which ISIS employs when it blows up ancient buildings and statues that is disapproves of.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Islington Eagle North of the River 16 Aug 17 8.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
When you start pulling down statues that you disapprove of, it is just a step to listing books that you will burn. Should we destroy all the film footage and photographs of Hitler? Trying to destroy or change history is a Stalinist activity. After all, the logic is exactly the same as that which ISIS employs when it blows up ancient buildings and statues that is disapproves of. Really? So Iraq should have statues of Saddam Hussein all over the place, India and Ireland should have British Generals in Main streets? Hitler should be in every town square. This is just plain nonsense. The trump comparisons with Jefferson and Washington - that they were slave owners - is valid BUT the distinction here is what is it that their statues are there to celebrate. In this case they were heroes of the American Revolution and founding fathers of modern america. If you take the view that the American Revolution was a great achievement and that the writing of the declaration of independence was an historic moment then having statues to these men to celebrate their contribution is valid DESPITE their other faults. THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE TO ROBERT E LEE - A great general he undeniably was but he was fighting for a cause that nearly everyone does not support any more. ISIS do not pull down statues and ancient buildings to re-write history rather they believe that images of god is idolatry and blasphemy - in almost the same way that 16th century protestants removed icons and statues from Churches.
Palace Fan |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Aug 17 8.57am | |
---|---|
Surely it all depends on the context of where a statue is placed and the story which is told on the plinth it stands on? If it glorifies something now regarded as evil then it encourages those who wish to perpetuate that evil. If it is there as a historical monument and part of the story of transition to a wiser world then it's fine.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Aug 17 10.13am | |
---|---|
Pulling down statues is provocative. It is also another example of favouring the minority over the majority.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 16 Aug 17 10.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Islington Eagle
Really? So Iraq should have statues of Saddam Hussein all over the place, India and Ireland should have British Generals in Main streets? Hitler should be in every town square. This is just plain nonsense. The trump comparisons with Jefferson and Washington - that they were slave owners - is valid BUT the distinction here is what is it that their statues are there to celebrate. In this case they were heroes of the American Revolution and founding fathers of modern america. If you take the view that the American Revolution was a great achievement and that the writing of the declaration of independence was an historic moment then having statues to these men to celebrate their contribution is valid DESPITE their other faults. THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE TO ROBERT E LEE - A great general he undeniably was but he was fighting for a cause that nearly everyone does not support any more. ISIS do not pull down statues and ancient buildings to re-write history rather they believe that images of god is idolatry and blasphemy - in almost the same way that 16th century protestants removed icons and statues from Churches. Where did I say this? Is is just plain nonsense for you to suggest that I did. Would you destroy all images, film etc of Hitler, after all most of them would have bee created to celebrate him.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Aug 17 10.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NickinOX
Well, they are a visible depiction of people who fought to preserve slavery. It is about time they came down. It is no different than pulling down statues of Soviet leaders in Estonia, or British ones in Ireland or India. For those who don't think it was about slavery, read the reasoning of the Confederate Vice President as to the causes of the war. By the way, there have been loads of murders committed by the KKK for their cause so I am not sure what your point is. The civil war was primarily about slavery...well, to be precise the money from it. But it wasn't only about slavery and symbols like General Lee came to represent the independence of the south. But there is no doubt that if Lincoln hadn't been elected president the war wouldn't have happened. It's one eyed to suggest that a statute of General Lee is just about slavery for everyone. I was annoyed about the bringing down of this statue as well and I don't support slavery at all. Plenty of people died on the confederate side and most of them didn't own slaves. It's air brushing of history, it's what extremists do when they seek to make society in their image. Not good. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Aug 2017 10.36am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.