I thought we were second best for about 80 minutes of the game. During this time we never really looked like we'd get forward to create anything. It might almost be fair to say Huddersfield only truly dominated us for 15 minutes but there wasn't any point in the game where I thought we dominated them.

Was a fair reflection imo

I must say that I think a lot of the criticism is a bit harsh. We had more shots, had 12 corners, 57% possession, better passing accuracy. & numerous other better stats....read for yourself.

[Link]

We were fouled 19 times compared to their 7, we should have had a penalty & they should have had a man sent off..........they made many more clearances than us but scored 3 of their 6 chances. David Wagner admitted after the game that the scoreline was very flattering.

Exactly sounds like delusional Pardew nonsense which is a concern.

I agree. Not Palace bashing here, but Ward and Fosu-Mensah both made interceptions that 99% of the time I'd expect to have ended up as goals.

But I did also text my uncle to say "Huddersfield's goal has an invisible force field around it". I think we were unlucky not to have scored at all.

We were second best for most of the game. They dominated us in the first half, and came out with the same intensity at the start of the second.