And another one given that the officials were minded to chalk off.

Shows how inadequate unaided officials really are.

============
The Ferret
============

Both done in around 30 seconds, and no players crowding the referee once the decision was given, a few creases to iron out but HAS to be used in the next couple of years domestically surely...

I guessing that we'll get to the stage were every goal is reviewed so is this going to take away the passion of scoring as you then have to wait 60 seconds to check.

I'm against it as I think it'll remove the instant passion but I accept we have to try it to stop everyone obsessing over referees decisions and using them as scape goats. What the hell are sky going to talk about they only talk about ref decisions.

The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years

Only one of the officials can call for a review and it would only be if they felt a bit of uncertainty about the goal, so i don't think it would get to a stag where it impacts most goals..

about 2 pm, I switch the car radio on, and there is a discussion on referees decisions.
Poll appeared to give honest ands reasonable answers about decisions called in feisty matches. Also said whatever aids the referees had, the two principles were
1. the referee always has the final decision
2. Once the final whistle is blown, none of the referees decisions should be challenged to change the outcome of the game.

I agree in principle with the 2 points above,.....however,...

When Poll was asked about playing the advantage for a few seconds before blowing the whistle, and calling play back,...he was resolute.
"Always let play continue for a few seconds to see how it plans out. You can always bring play back for a Free Kick if there is no advantage in letting play continue"

Made my blood boil thinking of ****enberk in the Cup Final.

I disengage, I turn the page.