You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Big Sam's maths
November 25 2024 10.47am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Big Sam's maths

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

Carox Flag Oxted 24 Feb 17 3.36pm Send a Private Message to Carox Add Carox as a friend

Oh dear, comments in the latest match programme do not inspire confidence. First, he's happy with a draw. Second, he thinks that if each player improves by 2%, that means the team as a whole will improve by 22% 🙄🙄😩

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
AshfordEagle94 Flag Canterbury 24 Feb 17 3.51pm Send a Private Message to AshfordEagle94 Add AshfordEagle94 as a friend

Originally posted by Carox

Oh dear, comments in the latest match programme do not inspire confidence. First, he's happy with a draw. Second, he thinks that if each player improves by 2%, that means the team as a whole will improve by 22% 🙄🙄😩

I'm missing the issue here clearly... Although we all want a win, would I settle for a point with the possibilty that a few results could get us the confidence to get more result? yes I would. Also, the maths would suggest he's talking about the starting 11.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 24 Feb 17 3.54pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Allardyce loves his stats !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Carox Flag Oxted 24 Feb 17 3.59pm Send a Private Message to Carox Add Carox as a friend

If each player improves by 2%, then the team as a whole improves by 2%, not 22%!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
AshfordEagle94 Flag Canterbury 24 Feb 17 4.12pm Send a Private Message to AshfordEagle94 Add AshfordEagle94 as a friend

Originally posted by Carox

If each player improves by 2%, then the team as a whole improves by 2%, not 22%!

Well then I apologise. My maths isn't my strong point either! Who would have thought I'd be learning on Holmesdale

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 24 Feb 17 4.17pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Carox

If each player improves by 2%, then the team as a whole improves by 2%, not 22%!

Unless it's a geometric rather than arithmetic progression. If you multiply each player together, ie 1.02 to the power of 14, you get a 32% improvement.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 24 Feb 17 4.24pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Unless it's a geometric rather than arithmetic progression. If you multiply each player together, ie 1.02 to the power of 14, you get a 32% improvement.

Getting all very technical - I haven't the 'Bandwidth' mentally to take this all in at my age ! I'm afraid I am cerebrally challenged !

Point Allardyce was making is that if every player improves, the whole team improves - one can argue and debate the maths till those darned 'Cows come home' !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
AshfordEagle94 Flag Canterbury 24 Feb 17 4.27pm Send a Private Message to AshfordEagle94 Add AshfordEagle94 as a friend

To be honest who cares about the percentage as long as it adds up to a result tomorrow

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Petereagle Flag Brockley 24 Feb 17 5.05pm Send a Private Message to Petereagle Add Petereagle as a friend

Originally posted by Carox

Oh dear, comments in the latest match programme do not inspire confidence. First, he's happy with a draw. Second, he thinks that if each player improves by 2%, that means the team as a whole will improve by 22% 🙄🙄😩

My maths would say that if each player improves by 2%, that the team would improve by - 2%. I hope BFS is right!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
paperhat Flag croydon 24 Feb 17 5.30pm Send a Private Message to paperhat Add paperhat as a friend

my maths say that if we score more goals (in the correct end) than boro then we have a 100% chance of 3 points.

 


Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chateauferret Flag 24 Feb 17 5.33pm

Perhaps he means "if each player contributes a 2% improvement in the team's performance".

But it's missing the point, which is that there are certain non-trovial issues to be fixed and if those were cleared up we would be a different outfit.

 


============
The Ferret
============

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
FairweatherEagle Flag London 24 Feb 17 9.23pm Send a Private Message to FairweatherEagle Add FairweatherEagle as a friend

Originally posted by chateauferret

Perhaps he means "if each player contributes a 2% improvement in the team's performance".

But it's missing the point, which is that there are certain non-trovial issues to be fixed and if those were cleared up we would be a different outfit.

(Sorry to carry on with the percentages but) problem is if each player contributes 2% to the teams performance, that's a 22% improvement in their own performance i.e. more than a fifth, which is massive. You could be right but this means a real step up by each and every player. Improvements in things like fitness, skill, speed, sharpness and attitude could conceivably add up to 22% overall improvement in a player.

But I agree there are specific things that need addressing (though we may disagree on what) rather than just some vague notion of "performance".

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Big Sam's maths