This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Jules111 Preston, Lancashire 31 Jan 17 10.16pm | |
---|---|
Hennesey - 7 Ward - 7 Dann - 8 Tomkins - 8 Delaney - 8 PVA - 7 Macca - 7 Cabaye - 7 Puncheon - 7 Zaha - 8 Benteke - 8 Subs Ledley - 7 Flamini - All in all a superb away performance, defended well and looked threatening going forward. Finally Big Sam is leaving his mark on the team. Fully deserved 3 points. The palace rollercoaster back underway!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
merganser 31 Jan 17 10.23pm | |
---|---|
Thanks for that, Jules.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hudsoneagle 01 Feb 17 12.43am | |
---|---|
Listen the lads played better today but I think they are still way off their best so 7's and 8's for that many? No chance. I'm buzzing with the result but mate I was nervous as hell the last 20 mins we sat back so deep and lucky enough Bournemouth didn't do anything with possession they had. Hennesey - 6 Ward - 6 Dann - 8 Tomkins - 6 Delaney - 6 PVA - 6 Macca - 6 Cabaye - 6 Puncheon - 6 Zaha - 8 Benteke - 7
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mad4palace 01 Feb 17 12.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hudsoneagle
Listen the lads played better today but I think they are still way off their best so 7's and 8's for that many? No chance. I'm buzzing with the result but mate I was nervous as hell the last 20 mins we sat back so deep and lucky enough Bournemouth didn't do anything with possession they had. They didn't do anything with their possession because we contained them well and Sam's game plan worked. Thought it was a little more nervy with Ledley in there but we did well defending.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hudsoneagle 01 Feb 17 12.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mad4palace
They didn't do anything with their possession because we contained them well and Sam's game plan worked. Thought it was a little more nervy with Ledley in there but we did well defending. King had a free header that he should have scored and the ball fell to one of their players at the back post but it bounced off his thigh...for me that was Bournemouth wasting chances rather than being contained. I think we deserved the 3pts though. Wilf was dangerous, they seemed to double up on him as well. Dann made the difference at the back today. His organising of the defence was key.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sprites Auckland 01 Feb 17 3.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hudsoneagle
Listen the lads played better today but I think they are still way off their best so 7's and 8's for that many? No chance. I'm buzzing with the result but mate I was nervous as hell the last 20 mins we sat back so deep and lucky enough Bournemouth didn't do anything with possession they had. Hennesey - 6 Ward - 6 Dann - 8 Tomkins - 6 Delaney - 6 PVA - 6 Macca - 6 Cabaye - 6 Puncheon - 6 Zaha - 8 Benteke - 7 6 for Macca is well harsh. He was everywhere and kept things ticking brilliantly I thought.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The_Aviator Rochester 01 Feb 17 3.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sprites 6 for Macca is well harsh. He was everywhere and kept things ticking brilliantly I thought.
Agreed! Jimmy put in such a shift today he was totally spent when he was subbed off... could hardly walk. Agree with the OP's performance assessments overall. Townsend was clearly trying hard when he came on. I'm glad he's not going back to the Geordies now. Good show!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
twist Miami, Florida 01 Feb 17 4.55am | |
---|---|
yeah anyone giving Macca a 6 for that is fookin blind, ran his nutz off, in a good way (if thats possible).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hudsoneagle 01 Feb 17 8.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by twist
yeah anyone giving Macca a 6 for that is fookin blind, ran his nutz off, in a good way (if thats possible). Depends what you expect from your best centre mid I guess. For effort its a 10 but for overall play it was not. He was totally knackered at the end I will give you that. The lads did what they needed to do to contain Bournemouth. I thought the first half we were better on the ball. Second half, after taking the lead we were generally poor in possession but I thought we were solid at the back. It was interesting to watch Bournemouth who perhaps were having an off day, but apart from Wilshere, would a single of their team have got into our 1st 11? They played the ball about with ease, always looked comfortable in possession, but had no cutting edge...and yet not one player stood out as better than ours except for Wilshere.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Andy_G Wimbledon 01 Feb 17 8.56am | |
---|---|
Harry Redknapp on talksport said 'we looked strong and there was only one winner with Bournemouth crosses. Bournemouth ran out of ideas'
The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 01 Feb 17 9.25am | |
---|---|
Pleased to see the ratings after a win! Agree with Zaha getting one of your higher ratings. Was MotM for me. Often unfairly maligned by the pundits, I thought he showed he was truly up for the fight last night and in my opinion he almost always is, just doesn't always get the chance to play his game.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sportyteacher London 01 Feb 17 9.35am | |
---|---|
Delighted and really encouraged by last night's result. 'Team Palace' very much prepped and playing with concentrated, tuned-in vigour. The team will need the same degree of application for Saturday's game vs. Sunderland who pulled off commendable defensive display against Spurs last night. My one nagging concern is the number of needless yellow cards being picked up by CPFC players.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.