You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Fitness levels
November 25 2024 8.34pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Fitness levels

Previous Topic | Next Topic


  

slubglurge Flag welling 07 Nov 16 5.53pm Send a Private Message to slubglurge Add slubglurge as a friend

There is no doubt in my mind that a lot of our players are lacking energy. We are constantly losing the midfield because we have too many plodders in that area. The Sun on Sunday printed a damning chart showing that we are 19th in the milage covered this season. No surprise Liverpool were top. We need to employ someone to improve their energy levels.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Y Ddraig Goch Flag In The Crowd 07 Nov 16 7.18pm Send a Private Message to Y Ddraig Goch Add Y Ddraig Goch as a friend

Originally posted by slubglurge

There is no doubt in my mind that a lot of our players are lacking energy. We are constantly losing the midfield because we have too many plodders in that area. The Sun on Sunday printed a damning chart showing that we are 19th in the milage covered this season. No surprise Liverpool were top. We need to employ someone to improve their energy levels.

And utd were below us

And at the time we were the fifth most pressing team

we are fifth in goals scored


One stat does not tell the whole story

 


the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
rollercoaster Flag Cornwall 07 Nov 16 7.37pm Send a Private Message to rollercoaster Add rollercoaster as a friend

I firmly believe our fitness levels are not as good as they were under Pulis and is a key reason why we used to over-perform and now under-perform.

Players cannot play well when they are nackered.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 07 Nov 16 11.00pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by rollercoaster

I firmly believe our fitness levels are not as good as they were under Pulis and is a key reason why we used to over-perform and now under-perform.

Players cannot play well when they are nackered.

There could be something in this but I would suggest that with all the monitoring of fitness there is these days, it is not down to only the manager. I suspect quite a few people see the data.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mad4palace Flag 07 Nov 16 11.27pm Send a Private Message to Mad4palace Add Mad4palace as a friend

Having less miles covered isn't necessarily a bad thing, HOWEVER; we are set up in the way that indicates that is they way we like to play. We are not the Pulis/Dougie team that likes to have less possession and simply hit teams on the break. We're trying to play a more possession based system but there is an incredible lack of movement and intensity in our game. The fitness issues have seemed to become more and more apparent the longer Pardew has been in charge. For a patch of the season we looked like a decent pressing team, but that system is so reliant on McArthur and Puncheon, the rest of the squad seems incredibly unfit.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
thai-eagle Flag chiang mai 08 Nov 16 5.20am Send a Private Message to thai-eagle Add thai-eagle as a friend

Why this obsession with possession? Leicester became champions with an average of 30-35%.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bexley Eagle Flag Bexley Kent 09 Nov 16 3.02pm Send a Private Message to Bexley Eagle Add Bexley Eagle as a friend

They are most likely the exception rather than the rule though. I just want us to win. I would prefer us winning playing decent attractive football, but if we have to tough it out I'll take it so long as we win.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
spartakev2 Flag Anerley 09 Nov 16 3.19pm Send a Private Message to spartakev2 Add spartakev2 as a friend

Doesn't the fact that we play better in the second half suggest it's not a fitness problem....

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
sickboy Flag Deal or Croydon 09 Nov 16 3.21pm Send a Private Message to sickboy Add sickboy as a friend

Originally posted by spartakev2

Doesn't the fact that we play better in the second half suggest it's not a fitness problem....

Yeah i was wondering that too.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Username Flag Horsham 09 Nov 16 4.03pm Send a Private Message to Username Add Username as a friend

Originally posted by Mad4palace

Having less miles covered isn't necessarily a bad thing, HOWEVER; we are set up in the way that indicates that is they way we like to play. We are not the Pulis/Dougie team that likes to have less possession and simply hit teams on the break. We're trying to play a more possession based system but there is an incredible lack of movement and intensity in our game. The fitness issues have seemed to become more and more apparent the longer Pardew has been in charge. For a patch of the season we looked like a decent pressing team, but that system is so reliant on McArthur and Puncheon, the rest of the squad seems incredibly unfit.


It works the other way around though. Teams with less possession generally run more as they are chasing the ball and defending.

Teams who keep the ball run less, as they are letting the ball do the work.

 


Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mad4palace Flag 09 Nov 16 5.48pm Send a Private Message to Mad4palace Add Mad4palace as a friend

Originally posted by Username


It works the other way around though. Teams with less possession generally run more as they are chasing the ball and defending.

Teams who keep the ball run less, as they are letting the ball do the work.

Maybe true, anyone who can find what our distance covered stats from 14/15 in particular would give us some indication, also where Leicester ranked last year.

But at the moment we're averaging 51.6% possession each game, that's the 8th highest in the league, highish yes but it's not around the 55-60% where the opposition would naturally be needing to do substantially greater amount of chasing down.

Perhaps both our high-ish possession stats and low distance covered numbers are mainly due to us conceding the first goal so often?

Edited by Mad4palace (09 Nov 2016 5.48pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Simbo2703 Flag Sayers common 09 Nov 16 8.05pm Send a Private Message to Simbo2703 Add Simbo2703 as a friend

If you take Liverpool as a prime example, of high presssing, total fitness for 90mins, they never gave a minute on the ball, no wonder we can play a bit better in the 2nd Half of games, cos we ain't busted a sweat in the 1st half. BUT saying that I thought we looked knackered 15 mins before the end of the Liverpool game.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  


Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Fitness levels