This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Fryers
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 dg1937  17 Oct 16 11.01am |
  |
|---|---|
|
What did people think of his performance on Saturday? I'm a bit undecided but 'probably OK' would be my verdict. Certainly an improvement on Kelly who, unusually for him, had a bit of a 'mare in the first half.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
thai-eagle  chiang mai 17 Oct 16 11.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Fryers was all right, but if he will be put in team to defend against Mahrez he will probably have a nightmare. Prefer Kelly though in the long run....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Username Horsham 17 Oct 16 11.33am |
|
|---|---|
|
He was there so we could go to a back three (which we did) and he could get some crosses in from the left. Was ok, but he still looks very nervous when closing people down.
Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leejaneagles 17 Oct 16 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
He is unable to curl a ball down the line with a clearance. Other than that I liked him. Anything is better than having a right footed center back at left back. That really annoys me and was glaringly obvious Souare was our only decent option so we should have spent money. I reckon Ashley Cole would have come back to us for a bit but if he's really dropped off the face of the Earth there are dozens of Championship left backs with natural left feet and some pace. No that isn't an improvement on the starting 11 like we'd like but if we run out of budget we should have brought anybody in, it's our weakest position.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 17 Oct 16 1.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Didn't do much wrong, "did OK" as the other guy said. A better performance than Joel Ward put in, then. Kelly "did OK" too - our problem was at right back in that game, not left.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 17 Oct 16 3.34pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mr_Gristle
Didn't do much wrong, "did OK" as the other guy said. A better performance than Joel Ward put in, then. Kelly "did OK" too - our problem was at right back in that game, not left. Agree with that except Ward was getting "double teamed" by Payet and Cresswell with little help from Zaha so I don't really blame him for looking like he had a bad game.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Y Ddraig Goch  In The Crowd 17 Oct 16 3.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I thought that he wasn't very good. In my opinion he Showed he is anything but ready for the PL. To be fair to him though, he wasn't alone
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ParchmoreEagle  Belair 17 Oct 16 3.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Under THOSE conditions he must have done okay. But did you see Cresswell? Now THAT'S the kind of LB we want. How much for one of those?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 17 Oct 16 3.52pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ParchmoreEagle
Under THOSE conditions he must have done okay. But did you see Cresswell? Now THAT'S the kind of LB we want. How much for one of those? EXACTLY!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 17 Oct 16 4.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Vastly improved.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 17 Oct 16 4.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Vastly improved. Agreed. He's now just below average.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Booted Eagle Bristol 17 Oct 16 4.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ParchmoreEagle
Under THOSE conditions he must have done okay. But did you see Cresswell? Now THAT'S the kind of LB we want. How much for one of those? Joniesta to Ipswich might of swung the deal.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.