You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Murray, Jerome and Gayle
November 23 2024 2.40am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Murray, Jerome and Gayle

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

Phil H Flag 16 Oct 16 11.11am Send a Private Message to Phil H Add Phil H as a friend

I watched the Championship show last night on Channel 5 and the first three games featured our recent strikers doing the business and scoring for Brighton, Norwich and Newcastle respectively. Given that all three struggled in the Prem does this show the gulf in quality between the two leagues? Or should we have kept at least Gayle?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leejaneagles Flag 16 Oct 16 12.16pm Send a Private Message to leejaneagles Add leejaneagles as a friend

Murray proved he was Prem quality and then Pardew insisted on Wickham who is a much worse much more lazy version.

He finally got it right with Benteke who is much better and Murray is another year older so he's in the right place now but we'd of won a lot more games second half of last season with Murray in the team.

Gayle is a no brainer. Everyone says he's found his level but if he was starting every week and next to Benteke he'd have 9 goals for us now as well. He's also the only striker we had completely different from the rest.

Wickham and Campbell are just much, much worse versions of Benteke. Gayle was an alternative option.

Jerome no, he has found his level.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
OknotOK Flag Cockfosters, London 17 Oct 16 11.11am Send a Private Message to OknotOK Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add OknotOK as a friend

Murray proved what his real level was when he couldn't get in another struggling premier league side.

He's a good player but is not good enough for the top division. And certainly not for a team aiming for a top half finish. Wickham is a technically better player and has more potential to develop.

Gayle is an interesting one as he is at least a different type of forward, but to suggest he would have 9 goals in the PL is, I think, laughable. His natural finishing ability is over-estimated. But he could have helped to provide a plan B. Unfortunately that plan B was meant to be with Remy, who has got injured.

Jerome was never good enough but was very good at the job Pulis asked him to do.

 


"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 18 Oct 16 10.22am

Murray, had some premiership chops, when he came back from loan at Reading, but probably not enough. The other two, excellent at Championship, but at best average premiership players.

That said, I'd have thought that a front two of Jerome and Gayle would be great combination, provided you had the midfield to cover them.

If Jerome could find a finish, he'd have been one of the best players in this league. He just couldn't seem to score in the premiership.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
sprites Flag Auckland 18 Oct 16 10.48am Send a Private Message to sprites Add sprites as a friend

Murray, yes. Although five years too old to really impact the prem.

Gayle, yes. Potent finisher. But never really given an extended chance.

Jerome, nah. (Although did his job well under Poolis).

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
sxp55 Flag South Norwood 18 Oct 16 11.03am Send a Private Message to sxp55 Add sxp55 as a friend

None of them will do a job in the prem.

 


@sxp55555

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 18 Oct 16 11.42am Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by sxp55

None of them will do a job in the prem.

Is the correct answer. All have them have played at the level, none of them have cut it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
collier row eagle Flag romford essex via another galaxy 18 Oct 16 11.43am Send a Private Message to collier row eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add collier row eagle as a friend

Originally posted by sxp55

None of them will do a job in the prem.

I thing they will do a job in the prem, but not to the standard we are looking to attain, if we are to go to the next level players like the 3. You mentioned are simply not good enough, nvow LEAVE IT FFS

Edited by collier row eagle (18 Oct 2016 4.41pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
We are goin up! Flag Coulsdon 18 Oct 16 11.54am Send a Private Message to We are goin up! Add We are goin up! as a friend

I think Murray is the only one who actually proved himself in the Prem, he did score a run of goals in Pards' first season remember! Still think it was the right decision for us to sell for the price we got offered, though. Bournemouth was a good contract for him, but football-wise it was a poor decision, they were never going to play the type of football that he thrives on.

Similarly, in the right system Gayle is definitely Premier League quality. Unfortunately for him, it's a system that is rarely seen in the Premier League these days. That debate has been done to death.

Jerome with shooting boots would be a hell of a player. For some reason when he comes up to the Premier League he has an allergy to shooting on target. Skying an open goal from six yards out for us against Norwich springs to mind.

 


The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 18 Oct 16 12.19pm

Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle

Is the correct answer. All have them have played at the level, none of them have cut it.

Murray and Jerome, less than Gayle. The first two are good at one or two things, but lack the general all round skill set. Murray is good at positioning and scoring, but his ability to link up play and then get into the box is poor, he lacks pace to get past defenders onto a long pass and he can't close down. Jerome, can do all that, but can't score.

If you could merge the two, you'd have a perfect striker. With both 'aging' their capacity to deliver for the team was waning. At best Murray had another season in him, maybe - but really should be a bench player at this level.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Pete53 Flag Hassocks 18 Oct 16 9.51pm Send a Private Message to Pete53 Add Pete53 as a friend

Another two for Dwight tonight. He's on a roll at the moment.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Jacey Flag 18 Oct 16 10.08pm Send a Private Message to Jacey Add Jacey as a friend

Originally posted by sxp55

None of them will do a job in the prem.

That's 11 goals for Dwight to date after just 13 games.Interesting to see how many more he scores this season and how many he will score next season in the Premiership for Newcastle, as I would have thought an instant return to the top flight is a forgone conclusion.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Murray, Jerome and Gayle