Universal Credit 'is working'

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Universal Credit 'is working'

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

matt_himself Matataland 15 Feb 15 10.59am
Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 15 Feb 15 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 15 Feb 15 1.13pm
Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. I used to be immortal
Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls

The Garden of Earthly Delights 15 Feb 15 1.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

I used to be immortal

Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 15 Feb 15 1.16pm
Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith! Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree. Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one! I used to be immortal
Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls

The Garden of Earthly Delights 15 Feb 15 1.16pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith!

Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree.

Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one!

I used to be immortal

Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol 15 Feb 15 2.33pm
Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith! Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree. Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one! Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah
Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol

15 Feb 15 2.33pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith!

Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree.

Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one!

Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success

Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert a moderator to this post

The White Horse 15 Feb 15 2.47pm
Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Can't work out if this has been posted in a sarcastic tone. Quotation marks presumably mean you don't believe a word of it? I can't remember a government managing to implement such a popular policy in such an incompetent manner. "The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee
Alert a moderator to this post

The White Horse

15 Feb 15 2.47pm

Send a Private Message to The White Horse

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Can't work out if this has been posted in a sarcastic tone. Quotation marks presumably mean you don't believe a word of it?

I can't remember a government managing to implement such a popular policy in such an incompetent manner.

"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 15 Feb 15 2.50pm
Quote The White Horse at 15 Feb 2015 2.47pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Can't work out if this has been posted in a sarcastic tone. Quotation marks presumably mean you don't believe a word of it? I can't remember a government managing to implement such a popular policy in such an incompetent manner. I was not being sarcastic. The title being in quotation marks was because I was quoting what had been said. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 15 Feb 15 2.50pm

Quote The White Horse at 15 Feb 2015 2.47pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Can't work out if this has been posted in a sarcastic tone. Quotation marks presumably mean you don't believe a word of it?

I can't remember a government managing to implement such a popular policy in such an incompetent manner.

I was not being sarcastic. The title being in quotation marks was because I was quoting what had been said.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

The White Horse 15 Feb 15 8.02pm
Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 2.50pm Quote The White Horse at 15 Feb 2015 2.47pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Can't work out if this has been posted in a sarcastic tone. Quotation marks presumably mean you don't believe a word of it? I can't remember a government managing to implement such a popular policy in such an incompetent manner. I was not being sarcastic. The title being in quotation marks was because I was quoting what had been said. If it was true, they wouldn't have to say it, would they? Total farce. Baffled anyone would think otherwise. "The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee
Alert a moderator to this post

The White Horse

15 Feb 15 8.02pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 2.50pm

Quote The White Horse at 15 Feb 2015 2.47pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Can't work out if this has been posted in a sarcastic tone. Quotation marks presumably mean you don't believe a word of it?

I can't remember a government managing to implement such a popular policy in such an incompetent manner.

I was not being sarcastic. The title being in quotation marks was because I was quoting what had been said.

If it was true, they wouldn't have to say it, would they? Total farce. Baffled anyone would think otherwise.

"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee

Alert a moderator to this post

peterg Anerley 15 Feb 15 8.08pm
Quote Pussay Patrol at 15 Feb 2015 2.33pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith! Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree. Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one! Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success Yes, and they originally claimed they would save £2bn. Plus, if Duncan Smith says it, it's almost certainly a lie. Of this government of spivs, con-artists, poshies and tax-dodgers, he's the dodgiest of the lot. Plus he lies the most, plus even his government colleagues think he's thick. Which he is. The right place at the right time
Alert a moderator to this post

peterg

Anerley 15 Feb 15 8.08pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 15 Feb 2015 2.33pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith!

Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree.

Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one!

Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success

Yes, and they originally claimed they would save £2bn. Plus, if Duncan Smith says it, it's almost certainly a lie. Of this government of spivs, con-artists, poshies and tax-dodgers, he's the dodgiest of the lot. Plus he lies the most, plus even his government colleagues think he's thick. Which he is.

The right place at the right time

Alert a moderator to this post

Bert the Head Epsom 15 Feb 15 9.07pm
Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. A Tory minister says so but then running up to an election maybe he would less than impartial. The National Audit Office don't agree.
Alert a moderator to this post

Bert the Head

Epsom 15 Feb 15 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

A Tory minister says so but then running up to an election maybe he would less than impartial. The National Audit Office don't agree.

Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 16 Feb 15 9.41am
Quote Pussay Patrol at 15 Feb 2015 2.33pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith! Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree. Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one! Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success [Link] [Link] Have a read of what is actually happening, rather than believe a politician, especially one who never tires of patting himself on the back! I used to be immortal
Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls

The Garden of Earthly Delights 16 Feb 15 9.41am

Quote Pussay Patrol at 15 Feb 2015 2.33pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith!

Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree.

Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one!

Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success

[Link]

Have a read of what is actually happening, rather than believe a politician, especially one who never tires of patting himself on the back!

I used to be immortal

Alert a moderator to this post

suicideatselhurst crawley 16 Feb 15 10.47am
don't give a fvck i'm not on benefits... Theres someone in my head ... But its not me X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS)
Alert a moderator to this post

suicideatselhurst

crawley 16 Feb 15 10.47am

don't give a fvck i'm not on benefits...

Theres someone in my head ... But its not me

X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS)

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Feb 15 10.54am
Quote Pussay Patrol at 15 Feb 2015 2.33pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am Say ministers and the civil service: [Link] People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report. Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith! Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree. Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one! Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success Doesn't necessarily mean its a success if it saves money. Arguably you could just stop all benefit and claim it was a success because it saved revenue. Here in lies the inherent problem of not employing independent bodies to confirm any statement or data presented by politicians as to the success or failure of their policy. Success is a very broad term. Conservative MPs have recently been hailing the success of British Drug Policy because the levels of use in society have dropped, despite the fact it has absolutely nothing to do with their policy (or the predecessors, or their predecessors). "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 16 Feb 15 10.54am

Quote Pussay Patrol at 15 Feb 2015 2.33pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.16pm

Quote crystal balls at 15 Feb 2015 1.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 15 Feb 2015 10.59am

Say ministers and the civil service:

[Link]

People on it are getting work quicker and more money than previous incarnations of benefits system, says report.

Or, to be more accurate, says Ian Duncan Smith!

Some, including the National Audit Office, would disagree.

Now, who should we believe; the man responsible for implementing the failing system, or those who are responsible for monitoring the failure? Hmmm... a tough one!

Do regale about this failure....They saved the taxpayer, you and me, £600M. I'd say that was a success

Doesn't necessarily mean its a success if it saves money. Arguably you could just stop all benefit and claim it was a success because it saved revenue. Here in lies the inherent problem of not employing independent bodies to confirm any statement or data presented by politicians as to the success or failure of their policy.

Success is a very broad term. Conservative MPs have recently been hailing the success of British Drug Policy because the levels of use in society have dropped, despite the fact it has absolutely nothing to do with their policy (or the predecessors, or their predecessors).

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Universal Credit 'is working'

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors