You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Will Pulis stay?
November 26 2024 4.44am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Will Pulis stay?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

  

Happiness Stan Flag Itchycoo Park 20 Apr 14 8.45pm Send a Private Message to Happiness Stan Add Happiness Stan as a friend

His stock has sky-rocketed and there've been rumblings of discontent between him and parish. Given the job he's done, he wd certainly be in demand for any teams that are fighting to stay in the premiership.

The sort of money at stake means these clubs will no doubt make it very attractive for him. Sides like villa, Newcastle, west ham, or any other bigger teams that have a wobble early next season, wd be delighted to have him.

He has two years to run on his deal. Do you think he'll stay the course?

 


"How can I remember to keep it all together when half the moon is taken away?"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
geoff Flag Midhurst 20 Apr 14 8.49pm Send a Private Message to geoff Add geoff as a friend

For me he can stay as long as he wants. He seems to relish a challenge and comes up with different ideas depending in the situations. If he chose to leave how good to have Keith Millen serving his apprecntiship under TP ready to take over. I think the board have learnt a lot from Freedman's and Holloways departures and whenever TP goes I am sure his replacement would be a more natural choice!,,
Things off and on the pitch are really good and in safe hands in all departments.
COYP.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 20 Apr 14 9.00pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Hope he stays. Absoluely loving this "hoofball/anti football" at the moment.

Oh.....wait, wrong team

Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (20 Apr 2014 9.03pm)

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 20 Apr 14 9.08pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend


Assuming no problems - with CPFC2010 or transfer money - think TP will want to stay and build on this seasons sucess next season. Don't beleive he as flighty as some we've had in the past - at least hope thats true!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Leicestershireeagle Flag South Leicestershire 20 Apr 14 9.15pm Send a Private Message to Leicestershireeagle Add Leicestershireeagle as a friend

In my opinion;

There would have been a time where there were teething issues. Two different people, different personalities, different opinions etc. Pulis seems very straight forward and honest, and I dare say told SP exactly what he thought.

Any rumors of unrest came from this periods. However, since then, TP has been backed in the transfer market, and has gradually bought into the ethos and community of the club. He was open about there being teething issues with him and SP and how it took them a while to get to know each other. I dare say, given IH's comments regarding our January spending, that TP was told there was little budget for January, but SP obviously made a gamble and committed himself and the club to Pulis.

Whatever was up before, I'd say doesn't exist anymore. I can't see there being any issues between TP and any member of the board.

 


RED AND BLUE ARMY!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Skinster Flag 20 Apr 14 9.18pm Send a Private Message to Skinster Add Skinster as a friend

depends on Pulis relationship with Moody, i can see them locking horns on transfer dealings.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
7@burnley79 Flag Battersea 20 Apr 14 9.19pm Send a Private Message to 7@burnley79 Add 7@burnley79 as a friend

Pulis oozes integrity and this he installs into this Palace side. Its the main reason the players have bought into his ideals and gelled so quickly and effectively. I believe a man like that doesn't jump ship for a few more quid than the £30k a week he gets from CPFC2010.
Its just an opinion, but i believe it holds some weight.

Edited by 7@burnley79 (20 Apr 2014 9.20pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 20 Apr 14 9.29pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Quote Leicestershireeagle at 20 Apr 2014 9.15pm

In my opinion;

There would have been a time where there were teething issues. Two different people, different personalities, different opinions etc. Pulis seems very straight forward and honest, and I dare say told SP exactly what he thought.

Any rumors of unrest came from this periods. However, since then, TP has been backed in the transfer market, and has gradually bought into the ethos and community of the club. He was open about there being teething issues with him and SP and how it took them a while to get to know each other. I dare say, given IH's comments regarding our January spending, that TP was told there was little budget for January, but SP obviously made a gamble and committed himself and the club to Pulis.

Whatever was up before, I'd say doesn't exist anymore. I can't see there being any issues between TP and any member of the board.


If there were issues between them in the beginning, I'm sure they no longer exist. Any businessman who wouldn't try to keep a successful manager would surely not be a businessman. So I'm inclined to agree. Especially as the board are life long supporters.

However, there are businessmen like Vincent Tan...

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Leicestershireeagle Flag South Leicestershire 20 Apr 14 9.31pm Send a Private Message to Leicestershireeagle Add Leicestershireeagle as a friend

Quote Tim Gypsy Hill '64 at 20 Apr 2014 9.29pm

Quote Leicestershireeagle at 20 Apr 2014 9.15pm

In my opinion;

There would have been a time where there were teething issues. Two different people, different personalities, different opinions etc. Pulis seems very straight forward and honest, and I dare say told SP exactly what he thought.

Any rumors of unrest came from this periods. However, since then, TP has been backed in the transfer market, and has gradually bought into the ethos and community of the club. He was open about there being teething issues with him and SP and how it took them a while to get to know each other. I dare say, given IH's comments regarding our January spending, that TP was told there was little budget for January, but SP obviously made a gamble and committed himself and the club to Pulis.

Whatever was up before, I'd say doesn't exist anymore. I can't see there being any issues between TP and any member of the board.


If there were issues between them in the beginning, I'm sure they no longer exist. Any businessman who wouldn't try to keep a successful manager would surely not be a businessman. So I'm inclined to agree. Especially as the board are life long supporters.

However, there are businessmen like Vincent Tan...

Thankfully Steve Parish wears his trousers at a sensible height!


 


RED AND BLUE ARMY!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 20 Apr 14 9.35pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Quote Leicestershireeagle at 20 Apr 2014 9.31pm

Quote Tim Gypsy Hill '64 at 20 Apr 2014 9.29pm

Quote Leicestershireeagle at 20 Apr 2014 9.15pm

In my opinion;

There would have been a time where there were teething issues. Two different people, different personalities, different opinions etc. Pulis seems very straight forward and honest, and I dare say told SP exactly what he thought.

Any rumors of unrest came from this periods. However, since then, TP has been backed in the transfer market, and has gradually bought into the ethos and community of the club. He was open about there being teething issues with him and SP and how it took them a while to get to know each other. I dare say, given IH's comments regarding our January spending, that TP was told there was little budget for January, but SP obviously made a gamble and committed himself and the club to Pulis.

Whatever was up before, I'd say doesn't exist anymore. I can't see there being any issues between TP and any member of the board.


If there were issues between them in the beginning, I'm sure they no longer exist. Any businessman who wouldn't try to keep a successful manager would surely not be a businessman. So I'm inclined to agree. Especially as the board are life long supporters.

However, there are businessmen like Vincent Tan...

Thankfully Steve Parish wears his trousers at a sensible height!


And he won't change our colours or name (again )

Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (20 Apr 2014 9.38pm)

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
crystal-purley Flag Purley 20 Apr 14 9.49pm Send a Private Message to crystal-purley Add crystal-purley as a friend

Quote Tim Gypsy Hill '64 at 20 Apr 2014 9.29pm

Quote Leicestershireeagle at 20 Apr 2014 9.15pm

In my opinion;

There would have been a time where there were teething issues. Two different people, different personalities, different opinions etc. Pulis seems very straight forward and honest, and I dare say told SP exactly what he thought.

Any rumors of unrest came from this periods. However, since then, TP has been backed in the transfer market, and has gradually bought into the ethos and community of the club. He was open about there being teething issues with him and SP and how it took them a while to get to know each other. I dare say, given IH's comments regarding our January spending, that TP was told there was little budget for January, but SP obviously made a gamble and committed himself and the club to Pulis.

Whatever was up before, I'd say doesn't exist anymore. I can't see there being any issues between TP and any member of the board.


If there were issues between them in the beginning, I'm sure they no longer exist. Any businessman who wouldn't try to keep a successful manager would surely not be a businessman. So I'm inclined to agree. Especially as the board are life long supporters.

However, there are businessmen like Vincent Tan...


Absolutely agree although SP does like to intervene in footie matters (if the rumours about browbeating DF in a car park are true). Hope TP doesn't leave and I for one am enjoying the football and watching the triggers thate are Bolasie and Puncheon being sprung regularly.
Also Bolasie seems to have been given shooting boots and I can see him getting a few next season.


 


Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course).

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
FinchleyEagle Flag 20 Apr 14 9.51pm Send a Private Message to FinchleyEagle Add FinchleyEagle as a friend

If I hear one more person say 'talk/rumblings/rumours of him not getting on with Parish' I may just lose my mind !

The only talk is people consistently saying that - so stop saying it !! Has no basis or foundation and unless you're a BBC journalist or work for the mirror why would you ?!

Is right p1ssing me off...

 


You'll be forever in my family's memories and it was an honor and privilege to play and lead in the red and blue
Yours sincerely
Mile Jedinak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Will Pulis stay?