This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Meerkat 2 1957 19 Dec 03 8.47am | |
---|---|
Should it be reintroduced for cases like Huntley, where the forensic evidence of his crime is so damning that there can be no doubt of his guilt, and the crime is so appalling there can be no question of him ever being released? Edited by Meerkat 2 (19 Dec 2003 11:29am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SOTH West Wickham 19 Dec 03 9.02am | |
---|---|
I'm with you Meerkat. There are plenty of people who oppose the death penanlty for a variety of reasons, but surely if ever there was a perfect example it's the murdering of children. I agree that there should be some sort of appeal, but if he's still found guilty after that then it's bye bye time!!!
Remember standing on the Holmesdale in the pouring rain, watching Deano hit a blinder in the last minute???? |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
naughty'n'nice Purley 19 Dec 03 9.25am | |
---|---|
I feel quite strongly about it - that it should be reintrouduced, because of people like hindly, and huntley, anyone who abuses little children who dont know whats happening, and then killing them, butchering them in some cases. I think that if anyone could even do that to a child once, then they should be tortured or thrown to their death - without a nice injection, but the way that they killed others.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SOTH West Wickham 19 Dec 03 9.29am | |
---|---|
Let the family of the victim decide the penalty.
Remember standing on the Holmesdale in the pouring rain, watching Deano hit a blinder in the last minute???? |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bexter By the Sea 19 Dec 03 10.04am | |
---|---|
absolutely not. firstly, it doesn't work as a deterrent - look at the US. secondly, being in prison for life is possibly worse, thirdly killing someone is wrong, full stop. whomever does it, including our justice system. it's sick. also, if you did open it just for definite cases - who decides they are definite? once the floodgates were opened there is the risk of many innocents dying - what about all those women accused of killing their babies by that dodgy professor? what about the birmingham six..... winston silcott..... etc etc etc!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Moose In the sewer pipe... 19 Dec 03 10.55am | |
---|---|
I'm with you on this one Bexter, you're only dragging yourself down to the level of the killer by executing them. And only one miscarriage of justice makes the whole idea collapse. The mother of Sarah Payne has said of executing Roy Whiting: "Nobody has the right to take another person's life. I believe that child killers should get life imprisonment and never be allowed to walk the streets. Killing Whiting would not take the pain away. In fact killing someone like that would turn my stomach." Leaving someone to rot in prison is often a better idea than executing them. Death for some of these people is the easy way out: think of Fred West, who never stood trial for his crimes. Huntley also tried to top himself earlier this year. He's 29 now and might well have to spend 50 years in solitary confinement mulling over what he's done. That to me is a worse punishment than execution.
Goodness is what you do. Not who you pray to. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Meerkat 2 1957 19 Dec 03 10.56am | |
---|---|
But it would appear to me that the Huntley case could be described as both definate and heinous in the extreme. Where could there possibly be a shred of doubt he murdered the girls? I agree with Bexter that the DP is not a deterrant, but what about the huge cost of keeping Huntley segregated for the rest of his life in an already overstretched prison system? Should we as tax payers really have to fund that? Should we still be paying to keep Ian Brady alive against his own wishes for that matter? By the way I'm not saying I believe the death penalty SHOULD be reintroduced and I share some of Beter's reservations, but I do think there is a case for discussing it - lets face it many people ARE in favour of it including, I suspect, some politicians and judges.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bexter By the Sea 19 Dec 03 11.04am | |
---|---|
you can't kill people just to save money!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Meerkat 2 1957 19 Dec 03 11.14am | |
---|---|
Quote Bexter at 19 Dec 2003 11:04am
you can't kill people just to save money!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jcreedy 19 Dec 03 11.15am | |
---|---|
Can we kill off the royals then? It'd be a much better way of saving taxpayers money Seriously though, people like Huntley deserve a harder punishment than just being locked up for the rest of his life and if the families of Holly and Jessica wanted him dead then fair enough in my opinion, but as Bexter has said, there's plenty of cases where 'guilty' people aren't guilty.
It was my dream to play for Palace and to make my debut. I've always played for the club so if I'm playing here, I wouldn't want to be anywhere else. - John Bostock (Nov 2007) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazed&Confuzed London 19 Dec 03 11.22am | |
---|---|
We're not adult enough for Death Penalties. It doesn't work in the US and never has. Look at George W Bush? Too many people are tried by the media and it just hypes people up. We are not in a position to throw stones. A.rseholes like Hunley should rot in a cell forever.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Meerkat 2 1957 19 Dec 03 11.27am | |
---|---|
Quote Bexter at 19 Dec 2003 11:04am
how would you favour killing them? rope round neck? lethal injection which can take many attempts? or fry 'em up good and proper til their eyes pop out?!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.