This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mapletree Croydon 02 Dec 21 11.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
"It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported" Haha. You really are clutching at straws. That comment predates Covid, the pandemic has radically increased the rationale for the site.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 03 Dec 21 12.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
I have been waiting for a magic pill. Always been self-isolating, playing it very long. So far, so good.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 03 Dec 21 12.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Can't say I agree with you that there isn't media downplaying of negative vaccine impacts. You are right that I regard my decision on the vaccine as the correct one. Let's not forget that it's within the context of age and knowledge of my own system. It is of course my personal choice and I'm certainly less trusting than you....but that doesn't mean that I'm certain of any position. Yes, you are also correct that my decision is partly political and reactionary to the way the state has manipulated and enforced its measures. As I've always said I think more people will die from their measures than be saved from them....the coercion and gradual removal of freedoms is insidious and I'm proud of the fact that I stood against it once we first knew the death risk percentage. I'm certainly am against the young being coerced into taking unnecessary vaccines for the benefit of others though I certainly do recommend vaccines or treatments for those with weak immune systems or of advanced years. As I've always said I'll review next year and look with fresh eyes at the evidence base, though that does not guarantee anything will change. I'm probably more interested in the treatments but we will see. Hell, it's about personal choice and I won't stand with the erosion of long standing freedoms nor soft peddle those that do.
I don't think anyone has meaningful knowledge of their own system with regard to a new illness during a pandemic. I see that as an 'I'm invincible (until I'm not)'. Nobody knows how they will deal with this other than basic indications such as age, good general health and so on, and even then the scales appear to tip well in favour of the unvaccinated in those age groups taking up hospital beds and vaccinated much less so. The roll of the dice is always in your favour unless you're old anyway, but scientifically it's difficult to get away from the fact that it is even more so if you've been vaccinated. Still I would agree that due to the probability it was always unlikely to make you meet your maker, certainly. I also concur in that I do not agree with this idea of proving you're vaccinated to go to the pub and so on (or of children having to be vaccinated). I think that enters the realm of the ridiculous and a weird combination of government control and tie its to 'big pharma' for the sake of a few more percent of people being vaccinated, which I don't see can reasonably to said to make much of a difference to anything. Edited by BlueJay (03 Dec 2021 12.20am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 03 Dec 21 12.33am | |
---|---|
Things can drift to either extreme. You get the 'why bother, nature will do what it will do' attitude when the same people clearly be clambering for any medical treatment going in any other circumstance, and then on the other hand there's the people who think you should need to show documentation to have a pint. Realistically the balance was already as good as it gets in terms of vaccination and the like (because there is no magic needle threading way to act where we 'win' and all is well, as that's not the nature of what we're dealing with). Case in point, it's clearly a huge positive that so many people have been vaccinated because it has radically cushioned the blow of hospitalisations and somewhat reduced the spread, while allowing natural infections to chug along at a high yet perfectly manageable level. But it's also important to remember that getting covid - especially post vaccination - isn't a terrible thing. For most it essentially acts as a booster and may well be somewhat protective against future infection and variants, especially in combination (with vaccination) and in that order. Problems emerge where people are so keen to perpetually avoid Covid forever that they view it as a disaster if someone catches it. On the contrary if you're able to catch it, it's inevitable that you will. It's all about being sensible around it (getting vaccinated first, regular testing to avoid giving it to the especially vulnerable if you're around them etc). Once you've had it there is certainly a period of time where you're safer to be around than almost, so that has to be factored in too. We've been ticking along at 40,000+ infections a day with relatively low hospitalisations in large part due to vaccination. Realistically it's probably closer to 100,000 cases. We're very likely to still get infected by new variants, but the key is surely how badly they impact us. There are studies showing that even getting a coronavirus common cold offers 'a degree' of protection against the most serious covid infections and so certainly I would hope that these 100,000 a day will go some way to cushioning the impact of future variants in terms of hospitalisations. We need to be flexible and sensible in our thinking and how we emerge out of this rather than dreaming that forcing everyone to get vaccinated before being served is going to magically change anything. It will change nothing in a big picture sense and life doesn't need to be that dystopian. Edited by BlueJay (03 Dec 2021 12.39am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 03 Dec 21 12.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I don't think anyone has meaningful knowledge of their own system with regard to a new illness during a pandemic. I see that as an 'I'm invincible (until I'm not)'. Nobody knows how they will deal with this other than basic indications such as age, good general health and so on, and even then the scales appear to tip well in favour of the unvaccinated in those age groups taking up hospital beds and vaccinated much less so. The roll of the dice is always in your favour unless you're old anyway, but scientifically it's difficult to get away from the fact that it is even more so if you've been vaccinated. Still I would agree that due to the probability it was always unlikely to make you meet your maker, certainly. To an extent I'd agree, certainly no one is invincible and while an individual of 52 certainly should know how generally effective they are around airborne infections I take the point. However, we can also turn that around and say no one also knows for sure about how new vaccines are going to effect their body when they have been necessarily rushed through development.....though I accept that the evidence says they have lowered death rates, which on the face of it is what we expected.....That said, they haven't been quite as effective as I thought they would be. But essentially I don't disagree with you. Originally posted by BlueJay
I also concur in that I do not agree with this idea of proving you're vaccinated to go to the pub and so on (or of children having to be vaccinated). I think that enters the realm of the ridiculous and a weird combination of government control and tie its to 'big pharma' for the sake of a few more percent of people being vaccinated, which I don't see can reasonably to said to make much of a difference to anything. Added to this is the general direction of travel that society appears headed down. Whether or not we believe conspiracy theories it seems undeniable that 'Chinese style' social control systems are a possibility with corporates playing buddy with government. I think this point goes beyond political tribe and becomes a libertarian/authoritarian issue where even people with disparate political positions can agree. Even if it's only writing something on a forum or perhaps attending a rally in your local area. Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Dec 2021 12.58am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 03 Dec 21 1.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
To an extent I'd agree, certainly no one is invincible and while an individual of 52 certainly should know how generally effective they are around airborne infections I take the point. However, we can also turn that around and say no one also knows for sure about how new vaccines are going to effect their body when they have been necessarily rushed through development.....though I accept that the evidence says they have lowered death rates, which on the face of it is what we expected.....That said, they haven't been quite as effective as I thought they would be. But essentially I don't disagree with you.
Medical professionals and places was paid extra to report pre vaccine almost all deaths as covid this ended when the vaccine was being fully rolled out the US was terrible for this. The other misleading thing about the stats is look at the numbers of people who died at the start up this is when you could say it took out most of the weak with not many left so to then compare later on to people because they had a vaccine is again misleading. The 99% survival rate is not made up this is for non vaccinated people for all groups if you separate groups this would change of course but no one can give the true number too many variables. I would also like to point out the media etc has lied about everything regarding this you always hear its vaccinated in hospitals this is a lie the numbers of vaccinated far outweighs this speak to medical professionals all over the world they will back this up I am well informed what is going on in Asia/US and the vaccinated have been hit harder with more hospital admissions. (Some ICU staff even let this slip from a few countries in EU they had no unvaccinated people in ICU) Ask this question how many people do you really know that has had this and ended up in hospital because of this not because they also have other medical conditions this is vaccinated or non? Not many people do. Things will never return to how they was this was the plan no reason anymore to continue with what is going on we could of returned to the ways of before but with people having options of going for boosters and wearing face coverings if they choose to.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 03 Dec 21 5.05am | |
---|---|
Another thing that concerned me with the whole vaccine thing, was the vast amount of personal data that was gathered, still being gathered.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Orange1290 03 Dec 21 5.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Haha. You really are clutching at straws. That comment predates Covid, the pandemic has radically increased the rationale for the site. Not at all, that's reality. Maybe you like many others have lost touch with reality.
Pro China, EU & Palestine |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 03 Dec 21 8.20am | |
---|---|
Hmm When the government announced the furlough scheme and other support schemes I said that this would involve massive fraud someone on here (I don't remember who) told me it was rubbish and couldn't happen. Whenever the government is giving money away the fraudsters are one step ahead of them.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 03 Dec 21 10.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Things can drift to either extreme. You get the 'why bother, nature will do what it will do' attitude when the same people clearly be clambering for any medical treatment going in any other circumstance, and then on the other hand there's the people who think you should need to show documentation to have a pint. Realistically the balance was already as good as it gets in terms of vaccination and the like (because there is no magic needle threading way to act where we 'win' and all is well, as that's not the nature of what we're dealing with). Case in point, it's clearly a huge positive that so many people have been vaccinated because it has radically cushioned the blow of hospitalisations and somewhat reduced the spread, while allowing natural infections to chug along at a high yet perfectly manageable level. But it's also important to remember that getting covid - especially post vaccination - isn't a terrible thing. For most it essentially acts as a booster and may well be somewhat protective against future infection and variants, especially in combination (with vaccination) and in that order. Problems emerge where people are so keen to perpetually avoid Covid forever that they view it as a disaster if someone catches it. On the contrary if you're able to catch it, it's inevitable that you will. It's all about being sensible around it (getting vaccinated first, regular testing to avoid giving it to the especially vulnerable if you're around them etc). Once you've had it there is certainly a period of time where you're safer to be around than almost, so that has to be factored in too. We've been ticking along at 40,000+ infections a day with relatively low hospitalisations in large part due to vaccination. Realistically it's probably closer to 100,000 cases. We're very likely to still get infected by new variants, but the key is surely how badly they impact us. There are studies showing that even getting a coronavirus common cold offers 'a degree' of protection against the most serious covid infections and so certainly I would hope that these 100,000 a day will go some way to cushioning the impact of future variants in terms of hospitalisations. We need to be flexible and sensible in our thinking and how we emerge out of this rather than dreaming that forcing everyone to get vaccinated before being served is going to magically change anything. It will change nothing in a big picture sense and life doesn't need to be that dystopian. Edited by BlueJay (03 Dec 2021 12.39am) I’ve just seen one bar chart showing hospitalisations going up in Gauteng, the South African province Johannesburg sits in. There isn’t enough context to conclude anything from it and you’d expect this with a version of covid with higher transmission. But we’ll see how high and fast those hospitalisations go. Also in Gauteng the figures for vaccinated people in hospital is around 2%. The vaccination rate is 25% I think. What’s strange is the ‘Unknown’ whether vaccinated is 80%, but you expect most of those to be uncomfortable or embarrassed unvaccinated covid patients. Yes, I wasn’t pleased when I had covid and after I’d finished isolating to keep hearing ‘’Sorry to hear that’’ and ‘’Hope you get better soon’’ before I felt dodgy. Then there were some after who assumed it was horrendous, which it wasn’t. Hi prefer to ask how was it? I spoke to someone who had severe sweats during his infection in March 2020 whereas I woke up a few times in a sweat soaked t-shirt so maybe that’s the difference the vaccines made for me, if after 5 months and a week there is much protection.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 03 Dec 21 10.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I don't think anyone has meaningful knowledge of their own system with regard to a new illness during a pandemic. I see that as an 'I'm invincible (until I'm not)'. Nobody knows how they will deal with this other than basic indications such as age, good general health and so on, and even then the scales appear to tip well in favour of the unvaccinated in those age groups taking up hospital beds and vaccinated much less so. The roll of the dice is always in your favour unless you're old anyway, but scientifically it's difficult to get away from the fact that it is even more so if you've been vaccinated. Still I would agree that due to the probability it was always unlikely to make you meet your maker, certainly. I also concur in that I do not agree with this idea of proving you're vaccinated to go to the pub and so on (or of children having to be vaccinated). I think that enters the realm of the ridiculous and a weird combination of government control and tie its to 'big pharma' for the sake of a few more percent of people being vaccinated, which I don't see can reasonably to said to make much of a difference to anything. Edited by BlueJay (03 Dec 2021 12.20am) I was agreeing with you up to this point. When, as you rightly say, the majority of hospitalisations are of the unvaccinated, and we know the NHS is under extreme pressure, both because of it being winter and a huge backlog due to the pandemic, we need to take all available steps to encourage, and coerce, people into getting vaccinated. For those that don't are not helping us overcome this. They are thinking only of themselves. We have a right to exclude them from a world we are making safer. I don't think it has anything to do with "big pharma" (which has plenty to answer for) or government control, and that they are just conspiracy theories. So I believe you are wrong. It CAN make a difference. It will encourage reluctant people to join us. Shame, and exclusion, can be powerful emotional triggers, and they need to be pulled when the benefits outweigh the restrictions of personal freedom. As they do now.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 03 Dec 21 1.40pm | |
---|---|
'Ends justifies the means' arguments....yeah that's gone well in history hasn't it. In fact that's behind just about every fecked up thing. Still it was amusing to read someone arguing that coercion can be positive. This world is upside down. Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Dec 2021 1.42pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.