This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Coronavirus (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
| W12 02 Dec 21 1.57pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Wow. You really have got it bad. Your article is from a David McLoone. The extra 18 deaths he mentions over a 7 week period could be for any number of reasons. I note he has made no adjustment for seasonality for example. He is simply trying to imply a causality, even when saying the reasons for deaths are unpublished, due to being a raving conspiracy theorist Presumably you go on that site a lot, I expect you feel strongly about abortion Meanwhile the information is ridiculously easy to find about any adverse reaction to the vaccines.
Why are you changing the subject to abortion?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 02 Dec 21 1.58pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's disgraceful scaremongering of the worst kind. Even the article itself says there is no established correlation between these statistics, which even if correct are on such a low base as to make statistical variance the most likely reason, let alone seasonal factors. Someone needs to investigate the authenticity asap and ensure the truth is known. Of course, it's really for US consumption as fodder for the so called "pro-life" lobby who are poised to claim a significant change in the law there. Why are you changing the subject to abortion?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Stirlingsays  02 Dec 21 2.05pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Wow. You really have got it bad. Your article is from a David McLoone. The extra 18 deaths he mentions over a 7 week period could be for any number of reasons. I note he has made no adjustment for seasonality for example. He is simply trying to imply a causality, even when saying the reasons for deaths are unpublished, due to being a raving conspiracy theorist Presumably you go on that site a lot, I expect you feel strongly about abortion Meanwhile the information is ridiculously easy to find about any adverse reaction to the vaccines.
Wow, what a crime.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| W12 02 Dec 21 2.11pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Wow, what a crime. Agreed but don't let these f***ers defer
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 02 Dec 21 2.12pm | |
|---|---|
|
The government data:
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Attachment: | W12 02 Dec 21 2.15pm | |
|---|---|
|
"It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported"
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 02 Dec 21 2.16pm | |
|---|---|
|
"disgraceful scaremongering"
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 02 Dec 21 2.53pm | |
|---|---|
|
f***ing crickets of course
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 3.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by W12
Why are you changing the subject to abortion? Because I wasn't! My comment was on the scaremongering, which your subsequent comments have done nothing to dispel. That your source is a so called "pro-life", advocate which is claimed to have been founded on "Christian" principals, with its primary readership in the USA caused the speculation on why it would publish such an article, on UK statistics, at this time. Of course, it might be that they are genuinely interested in what is happening here. Or just that they are anti-vax for children alongside their other stances. You have your opinion. I have mine.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 02 Dec 21 3.11pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Because I wasn't! My comment was on the scaremongering, which your subsequent comments have done nothing to dispel. That your source is a so called "pro-life", advocate which is claimed to have been founded on "Christian" principals, with its primary readership in the USA caused the speculation on why it would publish such an article, on UK statistics, at this time. Of course, it might be that they are genuinely interested in what is happening here. Or just that they are anti-vax for children alongside their other stances. You have your opinion. I have mine. You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 3.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by W12
You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts No. I read them all. Nothing you have said, or provided, suggests anything other than that article is scaremongering. It seeks to suggest that there is a link between the vaccination of children and an increased mortality, when no such link has been established, nor, to my current knowledge, can it be.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 02 Dec 21 3.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by W12
You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts It's his Ad hominem'
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.