Applies to everyone I would suggest whether you are far left far right (which are often two sides of the same coin,) or wishy washy centrist.

If you want to believe the mainstream media is biased you will find it. If you want to believe the came of the alternative media I am sure you will find a reason to.

This election has from all parties been built on poor campaigning, by all too often saying what you think others will do rather than what you will do. By the smaller parties making huge promises that they know they will never be challenged on as they will never be in power

Where is Count Binface when you need him?

I think a lot of people will vote for change simply because they see change as something they want in preference to the status quo

Indeed you can either believe something is true and factual or not. Whether it is actually true in terms of media is often an irrelevance. Will Labour hike taxes? Rishi says with some certainty they will Keir says they will not. Who knows? Only time will tell.

Look across the pond at Trump and Boden. What is truth and what is not is virtually meaningless what seems to matter is what people chose to believe.

Are trying to stitch them up?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

All sounds so easy doesn’t it? The problem is that it isn’t. Not by a very long chalk.

We are bound by international conventions to consider asylum for refugees.

[Link]

Farage cannot overwrite the convention and only Parliament could withdraw from it. They are very unlikely to do so because the damage to our international reputation would be severe. As Reform are not going to form a government Farage can make empty promises like this with no danger of them ever actually being tested and shown to be bs.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Do you know how many asylum seekers we have right now? It’s around 90,000!

You would need a very big ship! For reference the barge moored at Portland can house around 500. That caused a load of objections in the locality. You cannot just leave a ship on the high seas. They need to be refuelled, stocked and sheltered from storms. It needs to be berthed. Imagine having to find 180 similar ships and then find berths for them. The cost would be enormous.

If Reform does get around 20% they will still only get a handful of seats. Why? Because they will come second in many places. Places where a majority do not agree with Reform and prefer someone else. You don’t adjust policy for 20% of the people!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I am talking about migrants coming into the UK going forward not the 90,000 already here; I thought that would be obvious.
So how did the UK manage to supply North Sea oil rigs? It shouldn’t be that difficult because I am not talking about 90,000 migrants. And the system would be designed to act as a deterrent to people who want to bypass the normal system by not being able to prove who they are. The numbers should be quite small because it is a deterrent.
What if Reform got 48% of the vote? Would you expect parliament to take some notice?

hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.