This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 17 Sep 21 10.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Your usual condescension. I don't think I have ever read a post of yours where you are not condescending if you disagree. Is it a sport to you? Or do you really look down on others you disagree with? Debating is a sort of sport, yes. Keeps the mind sharp Posts of substance that I disagree with are given reasoned responses, plenty of evidence of that on here.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 17 Sep 21 11.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Yep, within acceptable margins. All well and good until your 12 year old son/daughter dies from the vaccine. And that is all medicines. Not just vaccines. Which is why they cannot be purchased over the counter without a doctors prescription? If they were as safe as alcohol or cigarettes (both of which are known killers) you could buy your vaccine at Tesco. They are not believed to be safely available to the public. Take medicine by all means. But to say that it is safe to do so is not true. Even paracetamol is controlled at the point of sale. P.S. Any chance you can cut out the condescending tone of your posts, or can't you help being rude? Where to start with some of this... Firstly, technically nothing is 100% safe. So it appears your definition of safe in this context is puritanical, and therefore nothing can meet your own definition. Not even eating your dinner, as there is a risk you could choke. Technically, not 100% safe. Also using an emotive argument instead of a logical one here is not useful. That said, risk, chance or contextualising properly would be much clearer than debating 'safe'. And with that... to be clear, you're saying here that smoking and drinking carry less RISK and CHANCE OF DEATH OR SUFFERING than all medicines. I mean, there's so much data across both of these areas that I'm not sure how you could ever come to that conclusion, but maybe I've interpreted incorrectly. I hope I have otherwise your sensitivity complex is about to be seriously triggered. Vaccines / Tesco – A combined annual flu/COVID vaccine is already in development. Expect to see this at your local Tesco in the near future. The flu vaccine also doesn't require a prescription. In fact looking into it quite a lot of vaccines don't require prescriptions. Not all medicines require prescriptions. The ones that don't, and there are many, have age and quantity limits. Just like Alchohol and Cigarettes. And the main reason for that is to prevent misuse by minors and overdosing. Seems sensible to me. Also, it's not exclusive either. I could OD on Vodka or Bananas right now if I wanted to. So I guess what some of us are trying to understand here, is what exactly is your point?
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lombardinho London 17 Sep 21 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Just a bit of fun.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 17 Sep 21 10.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
You might want to look up the meaning of the word unsafe. You're the one obsessed with linking it to death on repeat, but not bothering to give a single mention the huge impact on lives saved and hopsitalisations prevented.
The numbers were in the post on Twitter of a House of commons question about a report on the number of deaths caused by the vaccine. I didn't post it here, I merely commented on you disregarding it as "social media noise". You now attribute the numbers to me. Well, I didn't give them any endorsement whatsoever, I just quoted what you didn't like in the report. You even go on to say that I believe the report and "believes it may be responsible for countless deaths via cartoonish stats like "1632 deaths within 3 months of receiving the vaccine." Made up again. I really don't need to look up the meaning of unsafe, as I know what it means. You obviously picked your definition (dangerous, perchance?) otherwise you wouldn't be asking me to look it up. Also, I said not safe. Not unsafe. You may want to consider the next two statements. The vaccine is not safe for everyone. and The vaccine is unsafe for everyone. Now, if you really can't see the difference between the two, please ask someone to explain it to you who has training in teaching language.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 17 Sep 21 11.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Where to start with some of this... Firstly, technically nothing is 100% safe. So it appears your definition of safe in this context is puritanical, and therefore nothing can meet your own definition. Not even eating your dinner, as there is a risk you could choke. Technically, not 100% safe. Also using an emotive argument instead of a logical one here is not useful. That said, risk, chance or contextualising properly would be much clearer than debating 'safe'. And with that... to be clear, you're saying here that smoking and drinking carry less RISK and CHANCE OF DEATH OR SUFFERING than all medicines. I mean, there's so much data across both of these areas that I'm not sure how you could ever come to that conclusion, but maybe I've interpreted incorrectly. I hope I have otherwise your sensitivity complex is about to be seriously triggered. Vaccines / Tesco – A combined annual flu/COVID vaccine is already in development. Expect to see this at your local Tesco in the near future. The flu vaccine also doesn't require a prescription. In fact looking into it quite a lot of vaccines don't require prescriptions. Not all medicines require prescriptions. The ones that don't, and there are many, have age and quantity limits. Just like Alchohol and Cigarettes. And the main reason for that is to prevent misuse by minors and overdosing. Seems sensible to me. Also, it's not exclusive either. I could OD on Vodka or Bananas right now if I wanted to. So I guess what some of us are trying to understand here, is what exactly is your point? I agree with much of this, but you are wrong about the bold highlight. I realise that you probably don't know the background of the "It's not safe" rubbish as you jumped in at this late stage. I stated in the early days of vaccine development that "it won't be safe for years, if ever". This is now a "go to" for a certain poster whenever I post something he disagrees with, only, he likes to twist the words. As you say, nothing is 100% safe, but I have had to resort to simplistic and base arguments to get that message through.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 17 Sep 21 11.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
and The vaccine is unsafe for everyone. Now, if you really can't see the difference between the two, please ask someone to explain it to you who has training in teaching language. You repeatedly made no such distinction. The mantra was that the vaccine is not safe. I'm pleased to see your slowly evolving view. I've publicly stated numerous times that the vaccine should primarily be targeted at those who will gain most from it (rather than children etc), so you are now finally almost in alignment with reason rather than frequently expressed generalised vaccine hysteria. Clearly with your crystal ball in hand you also somehow knew all along that you personally would avoid the 'not safe' effects of the vaccine. I admire your confidence. Just as you as an adult are able to make decisions regarding your own health, so are others. They should do so knowing that the facts to hand demonstrate that not getting vaccinated typically carries a greater downside than doing so. If you're saying that there are rare cases of negative reactions, be aware that there are many more documented reactions in those scared out of having it, in part due to largely unfounded and misplaced fears.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 18 Sep 21 12.02am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
You repeatedly very recently stated, with no new 'add-ons' that the vaccine is not safe. You specifically restated just two weeks ago "I maintain that the vaccine will not be safe for years, if ever. I have never changed my stance on this." so there is absolutely no need to go back to the early days' of anything as you confirmed this month it's a view you still hold. It's a shame that every day to you is some kind of reinvention of what was said prior to it. Peppering 'not safe' in perpetuity, and cherry pick tragedies and barmy "1632 deaths within 3 months of receiving the vaccine" inferences will cause more harm than good. Hospitalisations are much more likely in adults (even those under 50) who avoid vaccination than those who don't, as we should expect. Considering 90% of adults have had their first jab or more, there have been remarkably few problems and people have clearly made their decision. The jabs have clearly prevented a staggering number of deaths. Be very grateful that you live in a society where you get to whine on endlessly about how the vaccine isn't safe, while also having access to it, which you repeatedly take advantage of. Talk about 'first world problems'. Edited by BlueJay (18 Sep 2021 11.57am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 18 Sep 21 12.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I agree with much of this, but you are wrong about the bold highlight. I realise that you probably don't know the background of the "It's not safe" rubbish as you jumped in at this late stage. I stated in the early days of vaccine development that "it won't be safe for years, if ever". This is now a "go to" for a certain poster whenever I post something he disagrees with, only, he likes to twist the words. As you say, nothing is 100% safe, but I have had to resort to simplistic and base arguments to get that message through. Please show me how I am wrong - from my interpretation of your previous post this is exactly what you are saying. Vaccines are less safe than alcohol or smoking. Further - unless otherwise corrected it seems your definition of safe / low risk is subjectively more sensitive than the data would suggest.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 18 Sep 21 1.20pm | |
---|---|
Just finished my shift volunteering at a vaccination centre in Penge. I was out front and the police pulled up I had a chat with them they were checking all the centres in the Bromley / Beckenham area. All was quiet at my one. Apparently they were concerned with anti-vaxer protestors at vaccination sites, must of the trouble has been in central London he said but this week there has been trouble in the Croydon area with antivaxers abusing and threatening the public going to get their jab.
As for anyone who thinks it a good idea to threaten people many of whom are vulnerable and or scared of having any type of jab, GO TO HELL YOU MORONS. Idiots and bully boys.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 18 Sep 21 2.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Just finished my shift volunteering at a vaccination centre in Penge. I was out front and the police pulled up I had a chat with them they were checking all the centres in the Bromley / Beckenham area. All was quiet at my one. Apparently they were concerned with anti-vaxer protestors at vaccination sites, must of the trouble has been in central London he said but this week there has been trouble in the Croydon area with antivaxers abusing and threatening the public going to get their jab.
As for anyone who thinks it a good idea to threaten people many of whom are vulnerable and or scared of having any type of jab, GO TO HELL YOU MORONS. Idiots and bully boys. What a shame. If these people really don't want to get vaccinated then that's their choice, but to intimidate others it's a sad state of affairs with implications for the health of those they're threatening.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lombardinho London 22 Sep 21 8.53pm | |
---|---|
The Roll Out's getting rolled back in
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 22 Sep 21 10.44pm | |
---|---|
He really kept us waiting for the big reveal.. but realistically the vaccine roll-out isn't going to be paused, so we have to ask ourselves, is this guy misleading us or has he been misled?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.