This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
He 'could'? It's already a bloomin saga. He called the vaccines 'unsafe for years', then had to have it extracted from him that he'd eventually had it, and now he's back to saying it's unsafe. Of course if someone views a vaccine as unsafe at various points before and after actually having it, then taking it into their body may not be the best choice. The only exception to that is if on some level outside of online bluffer and bluster they do actually believe that it was the right choice and may well protect them but prefer to do the 'have your cake and eat it' of maintaining an outwardly dismissive view of the vaccine. I'd say this is closer to the truth and of course also closer to the reality in health terms too. I maintain that the vaccine will not be safe for years, if ever (you forgot that bit). I have never changed my stance on this. It's risks are less than not having it for many people. I have never stated otherwise. However, it is not safe. As usual, you overlook what is written and attack the writer. All this talk of "bluster" and "have your cake and eat it" is your own invention. As for "maintaining an outwardly dismissive view of the vaccine", I had the vaccine when I was offered it. How dismissive is that? Read what is written. Or I may have to quote Mr Twain.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Indeed. But the vaccine is not safe. Neither is walking down a street, driving a car, traveling by aircraft, going to football matches, and most other things.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bearcage
Neither is walking down a street, driving a car, traveling by aircraft, going to football matches, and most other things. I think it's hard to say that with certainty without it being several years down the line. Long terms effects just aren't known. It was always a risk assessment...and it's partly why I'm very against these vaccines being given to people at extremely low risk of dying. Saying to young people that they can't go to events without being vaccinated is completely wrong. Societally vampiric.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bearcage
Neither is walking down a street, driving a car, traveling by aircraft, going to football matches, and most other things. Yep. But I have a choice whether to do those things or not. If I refused to do any of those, they might make my life harder, but that would be my choice. Get it? MY CHOICE. Enforcing it upon others at low risk, in fact lower risk, of dying from the virus than the vaccine is not acceptable.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Get off bitchute ffs. It's guff. Sunday Sport style. If you want to debate the vaccine/virus find a better source please. Nobody reads this stuff. You're wasting your time.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
BlueJay ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Get off bitchute ffs. It's guff. Sunday Sport style. If you want to debate the vaccine/virus find a better source please. Nobody reads this stuff. You're wasting your time. I agree with you on this one. Whenever anyone fires across a bitchute link you immediately learn more about them than the video they're sending could ever convey
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Yep. But I have a choice whether to do those things or not. If I refused to do any of those, they might make my life harder, but that would be my choice. Get it? MY CHOICE. Enforcing it upon others at low risk, in fact lower risk, of dying from the virus than the vaccine is not acceptable. Who is at a lower risk of dying from the virus than the vaccine that is being forced to take the vaccine?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
BlueJay ![]() |
|
---|---|
Throw away your meds folks. Have you seen that side effects profile!
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Get off bitchute ffs. It's guff. Sunday Sport style. If you want to debate the vaccine/virus find a better source please. Nobody reads this stuff. You're wasting your time. If you're interested in the truth (which I am, are you?), sometimes you need to go onto Bitchute.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bearcage
Who is at a lower risk of dying from the virus than the vaccine that is being forced to take the vaccine?
Ok not being “forced” but you will lose your job and also lose access to bars/restaurants/shops/sporting events etc - this is coercion.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eden Eagle
Ok not being “forced” but you will lose your job and also lose access to bars/restaurants/shops/sporting events etc - this is coercion.
Pro China, EU & Palestine |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.