This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 20 10.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by madcap_v2
Out of interest, if the BLM knee pre-match morphed into some other form of solidarity towards racial equality, how would people feel about it here? Pleased? Happy? Or is this racism being shoved down throats again? I think the players should do something periodically - when they do it all the time I think it loses some effect. As to what, I have no idea; applaud each other? Link arms (when allowed)?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 18 Dec 20 10.17am | |
---|---|
Apparently the players are being surveyed, do they want to continue it. I would hope this is a private questionnaire and gives them the option to suggest alternatives.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Dec 20 10.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think professional football is a success story when it comes to integration and equality, yes it has a murky past but I am talking about now. I have no problem with footballers campaigning if that's what they believe in but do it outside of the match as Marcus Rashford has done. I also have no problem with footballers walking off the pitch in protest if they are racially abused by the crowd although that wont happen here more likely in Europe. Making gestures at every game is pointless. kick Out has done a lot of good in the schools the players should get behind that campaign if there are things that should be done better by Kick it our or its needs more money then the players should push for that rather than virtue signalling. This reminds me of Edward VIII in the Welsh mining village when the press heard him murmur "something most be done". He wasn't going to do anything about it but apparently if you are rich and a high profile figure making a pointless gesture gets the job done, NOT. This is all besides the point. The players don't feel this way. Is it right to boo them because you disagree?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Dec 20 10.21am | |
---|---|
This ought to end any discussion on why the players are making this gesture.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 18 Dec 20 10.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This is all besides the point. The players don't feel this way. Is it right to boo them because you disagree? You have no idea how the players feel. As normal you are talking drivel. Players are forced to go along with the charade. Nobody dares to speak out for fear of recrimination so it’s easier to just go along with it. Edited by Tom-the-eagle (18 Dec 2020 10.22am)
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 20 10.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This ought to end any discussion on why the players are making this gesture. No it doesn’t. It explains why they want to make A gesture. Just not this one.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Dec 20 10.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Astounding. That post is nonsense. You remind me of a 4 year old hysterically distraught over a situation they don't comprehend, only knowing they are upset. I would attempt a rebuttal but you've rambled incoherently again, like the 4 year old would. It is literal nonsense I cannot emphasise that enough. With that kind of ridiculous reaction is it any wonder I was reluctant to try to explain to you why your analogy had no validity? If a theoretical situation has no practical application then it has no direct relationship to the issue. In fact it's theory actually supports the idea that the player's protests have no political implications. Something the PFA have confirmed today. You obviously cannot see beyond your own prejudices and into the real world beyond them. All you were doing was making waves to try to support those prejudices. I stopped being a 4-year-old, 72 years ago!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Dec 20 10.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
No it doesn’t. It explains why they want to make A gesture. Just not this one.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Dec 20 10.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle
You have no idea how the players feel. As normal you are talking drivel. Players are forced to go along with the charade. Nobody dares to speak out for fear of recrimination so it’s easier to just go along with it. Edited by Tom-the-eagle (18 Dec 2020 10.22am) Read this.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 18 Dec 20 10.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
With that kind of ridiculous reaction is it any wonder I was reluctant to try to explain to you why your analogy had no validity? If a theoretical situation has no practical application then it has no direct relationship to the issue. In fact it's theory actually supports the idea that the player's protests have no political implications. Something the PFA have confirmed today. You obviously cannot see beyond your own prejudices and into the real world beyond them. All you were doing was making waves to try to support those prejudices. I stopped being a 4-year-old, 72 years ago! Seriously, you are spoiling this forum for a lot of people. There have always been arguments etc but you take things to a new level, I hope the site owners read this because you really are bad for this site.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 20 10.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
With that kind of ridiculous reaction is it any wonder I was reluctant to try to explain to you why your analogy had no validity? If a theoretical situation has no practical application then it has no direct relationship to the issue. In fact it's theory actually supports the idea that the player's protests have no political implications. Something the PFA have confirmed today. You obviously cannot see beyond your own prejudices and into the real world beyond them. All you were doing was making waves to try to support those prejudices. I stopped being a 4-year-old, 72 years ago! You’re still ignoring the fact that there are laws which expressly state there can’t be any political involvement in the game so even if there was they couldn’t say so.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 20 10.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What alternative have they been offered? The kneeling is the divisive issue not what they’re supposed to be saying.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.