This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Crystal_Clear Belfast 06 Jan 24 10.59am | |
---|---|
Alot of articles around about how the big clubs are looking to in ahead of their rivals for Olise in January. If we had a bid of 50m - 60m, should we take it Jan and use elsewhere in the team ? I am thinking we probably should (as long as he doesn't goto Utd or Liverpool) , aand as long as the money is spent wisely, and there is the issue. After the summer, what would DF and SP do with the money ? I think we can forget Ronnie Edwards - both West Ham and Villa are in for him. We should be looking at someone like Jonathan Rowe from Norwich as a replacement, as well as a right back, midfielder and centre forward (maybe a loan or two here).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 06 Jan 24 11.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Crystal_Clear
Alot of articles around about how the big clubs are looking to in ahead of their rivals for Olise in January. If we had a bid of 50m - 60m, should we take it Jan and use elsewhere in the team ? I am thinking we probably should (as long as he doesn't goto Utd or Liverpool) , aand as long as the money is spent wisely, and there is the issue. After the summer, what would DF and SP do with the money ? I think we can forget Ronnie Edwards - both West Ham and Villa are in for him. We should be looking at someone like Jonathan Rowe from Norwich as a replacement, as well as a right back, midfielder and centre forward (maybe a loan or two here). I Think we should sell him, wherever he goes to get a decent replacement on loan, for the rest of the season, at the team he goes too as part of the deal and another winger on loan from somewhere else with option to buy. Whittaker from Plymouth would be my choice.
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Croydon-Trucker 06 Jan 24 11.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
Take the 60m, before he becomes another Ferguson, and re invest in Jack Clarke, and Morgan Whittaker I've been saying it now for the last 2 windows, i cant understand why we haven't gone in for Clarke , at 10 mill a snip . A young Zaha in his prime . Maybe we have too many wingers ... Oh wait now . Have a look at him today against Sandcastle , it will prob put another 10 mill on his price tag .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MrRobbo Chaldon 06 Jan 24 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Actually we did. We had a decade of him playing 90 mins every game. Good job he didnt sign that 250k contract
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 06 Jan 24 12.19pm | |
---|---|
Surely, if a player has a 60m release clause, that is a bare minimum; it doesn't mean that he has to be sold at that price. So, if Man City, say, were to come in with a bid of 60m, Liverpool, perhaps might offer 70m, then Man Utd 80m. Then, I'm supposing, the highest offer would win out, if Michael accepted terms. Am I wrong?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 06 Jan 24 12.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
So, if Man City, say, were to come in with a bid of 60m, Liverpool, perhaps might offer 70m, then Man Utd 80m. Then, I'm supposing, the highest offer would win out, is Michael accepted terms. Am I wrong? Good Q?, I'm not sure about that personally, what i do know, is his RC only comes into force on July 1st, this is being reported on various click-bait sites . . . [Link]
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 06 Jan 24 3.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
Surely, if a player has a 60m release clause, that is a bare minimum; it doesn't mean that he has to be sold at that price. So, if Man City, say, were to come in with a bid of 60m, Liverpool, perhaps might offer 70m, then Man Utd 80m. Then, I'm supposing, the highest offer would win out, if Michael accepted terms. Am I wrong?
Yes, once the release clause has been reached, and Olise wants to go, Palace has no part to play, it is strictly between Olise and the new club he chooses
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 06 Jan 24 3.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
Yes, once the release clause has been reached, and Olise wants to go, Palace has no part to play, it is strictly between Olise and the new club he chooses Agreed. We would have three or four clubs all bidding £60m and Olise could speak to them all before taking his pick. Like I said in an earlier post, clever boy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 06 Jan 24 3.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
Olise and Eze were speculative, i am certain both would be good buys, however good Olise is, if he keeps getting injured he is no use Yes, Olise and Eze were speculative.. Signing any young player who hasn't proven themselves in the top flight is a gamble. Point is, the gamble on those two paid off. Why would we choose to gamble again by selling Olise and seeing if we get the same luck with Clarke or Whittaker? We are already ahead, why speculate? Again, I'd be happy to sign either but not happy to see either as a strategy for replacing Olise. Certainly, to proactively sell Olise to buy Clarke or Whittaker seems a very bad idea to me. In terms of injury, happens to most players (Eze included). Doesn't mean they are a busted flush. Edited by TheBigToePunt (06 Jan 2024 3.48pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 06 Jan 24 4.21pm | |
---|---|
We need to keep our best players for the rest of this season. To sell in this window and then speculate on Championship players to fill the gap/s isn't sensible in my opinion.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 06 Jan 24 4.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
We need to keep our best players for the rest of this season. To sell in this window and then speculate on Championship players to fill the gap/s isn't sensible in my opinion. Couldn't agree more NEILLO.
Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 06 Jan 24 4.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
We need to keep our best players for the rest of this season. To sell in this window and then speculate on Championship players to fill the gap/s isn't sensible in my opinion. Agree, however I'd be very happy to see us go in for Clarke and not sell. Seems I'm not the only one looking at that situation and thinking 'Surely?'.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.