This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Jan 24 11.13am | |
---|---|
“Keir Starmer has made clear he would not have a resignation honours list. A Labour government will clean up politics, including banning second jobs for MPs and rooting out cronyism.” It will be a first if it happens that's for sure. House of Lords champagne bill £90,000 last year. It's outrageous, but not untypical, that Truss should be able to appoint these people as lawmakers.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 02 Jan 24 11.51am | |
---|---|
You can’t ban 2nd jobs. It’s only if the job conflicts with time or is proven to benefit politically. This starmer is a QC so should know this.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 02 Jan 24 12.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
You can’t ban 2nd jobs. It’s only if the job conflicts with time or is proven to benefit politically. This starmer is a QC so should know this. I beg to differ. I could only take a 2nd job working for the bank with their approval and it could not impact my working hours and a host of other things e.g. running a p*** site in my spare time. In the past I know plenty of people who could only get part time work so had 2 part times jobs that dove tailed. However they were banned from doing this on the grounds that the first employer might need them to work extra hours and they would not be available. Disgusting I grant you but it appears to be legal. I agree with Starmer, MPs should focus on the job they are paid for not lining their pockets with part time directorships or consultants ti the Trade Unions.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Jan 24 3.11pm | |
---|---|
Early desperation from Sunak, him and Cleverly look more like Laurel and Hardy every minute. You may be able to fool all the people all of the time, clearly in our case with Brexit, but not BBC Verify. The government, and Home Office, taken down.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 02 Jan 24 4.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
“Keir Starmer has made clear he would not have a resignation honours list. A Labour government will clean up politics, including banning second jobs for MPs and rooting out cronyism.” It will be a first if it happens that's for sure. House of Lords champagne bill £90,000 last year. It's outrageous, but not untypical, that Truss should be able to appoint these people as lawmakers.
You obviously haven't noticed that he says whatever you want to hear.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 02 Jan 24 4.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
“Keir Starmer has made clear he would not have a resignation honours list. A Labour government will clean up politics, including banning second jobs for MPs and rooting out cronyism.” It will be a first if it happens that's for sure. House of Lords champagne bill £90,000 last year. It's outrageous, but not untypical, that Truss should be able to appoint these people as lawmakers.
I hear he's going to appoint one of his mates to lead the taskforce. Edited by Badger11 (02 Jan 2024 4.06pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 02 Jan 24 5.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I beg to differ. I could only take a 2nd job working for the bank with their approval and it could not impact my working hours and a host of other things e.g. running a p*** site in my spare time. In the past I know plenty of people who could only get part time work so had 2 part times jobs that dove tailed. However they were banned from doing this on the grounds that the first employer might need them to work extra hours and they would not be available. Disgusting I grant you but it appears to be legal. I agree with Starmer, MPs should focus on the job they are paid for not lining their pockets with part time directorships or consultants ti the Trade Unions. Yes and no. The "yes" you have covered and I agree with. But... One issue with much of the current crop of MPs is the career politician. They know a whopping nothing about the world outside their tiny bubble but seek to rule those who reside there. You may not like them, but Heseltine and Howard (to name but 2) had successful careers and then brought their skills and worldliness into their job.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 02 Jan 24 5.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Yes and no. The "yes" you have covered and I agree with. But... One issue with much of the current crop of MPs is the career politician. They know a whopping nothing about the world outside their tiny bubble but seek to rule those who reside there. You may not like them, but Heseltine and Howard (to name but 2) had successful careers and then brought their skills and worldliness into their job. I don't disagree that some Mps have a successful career outside of politics but that is not the point. Parliament sits on average about 170 days a year. That includes Fridays when they bunk off at lunchtime so to the rest of us that is a half day. Meanwhile our overworked underpaid politicians complain about their lot. I appreciate that they also have constituency work but somehow they seem to find time to have extra jobs. Nice work if you can get it. The Parliamentary calendar is a joke it goes back to when most MPs were landowners and farmers so certain times of the year needed to be on their land. Reform of the working hours to make it more family friendly is long overdue. Edited by Badger11 (02 Jan 2024 5.31pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Jan 24 10.33pm | |
---|---|
A new offence of defrauding the public purse max 10 years - Starmer. Sounds like the tories ought to be ordering a fleet of small boats going the other way......
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Phil’s Barber Crowborough 02 Jan 24 10.41pm | |
---|---|
The difficulties we may be experiencing currently will seem mild in comparison to the nightmare situation(s) we will be in under Labour.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 02 Jan 24 10.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
A new offence of defrauding the public purse max 10 years - Starmer. Sounds like the tories ought to be ordering a fleet of small boats going the other way......
Be a few self employed doing bird then
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 02 Jan 24 10.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
The difficulties we may be experiencing currently will seem mild in comparison to the nightmare situation(s) we will be in under Labour. Sadly we are going to experience it due to apathy and a change is as good as a rest mentality.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.