There may well be, but it won't be one that satisfies you because what you see as the "problem", others don't.

There is a problem with illegal, unmanaged immigration via the activities of criminal gangs. Getting control of that is hard enough. Achieving what you seem to want is neither practical nor, ultimately, either necessary or desirable.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Luckily, our legal advisor (BJ) thinks it would be legally fully compliant.

"Boris Johnson has said he believes the scheme complies with international law.", say the man recently fined for Covid rule-breaking

I disengage, I turn the page.

You offer conclusive proof that nothing that is even remotely possible will ever satisfy you. Not only that, you blame everything you don't like on "immigration".

You are like an old 45 record stuck on a song from the 60s. The attitudes you display are identical to those I heard as a young man from the older generation back then.

The world has changed, whether you like it, or can accept it, you really must come to terms with that. It's not going to reverse direction. The UK might have detached itself from the EU, but it cannot detach itself from the world.

If you find the environment of where you live no longer suits you, then change where you live. The answer to your personal circumstances lies in your own hands, but you don't have the responsibility for, or power over, anything else.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The UN is not impartial it is a political forum used by many countries to brow beat the west. Take a look at which countries sit on the Human Right council, a joke.

I am not convinced that this is a good plan but neither do I pay attention to the UN and their claims of international law. We are governed in this country by our laws and whatever international treaties we have signed. We can withdraw from those treaties if we choose as for "international law" it is a gray area not properly defined or even signed up to Human Rights lawyers are always trying to extend it.

One more point

Move to a CR0 postcode and let us know your opinion then

COYP

Dear oh dear. Make your mind up.

I dare say there are people in big cities who are okay with this either for now until they are the minority, or maybe forever, come what may. There are then those who’ve moved out or have always lived away from densely populated areas and want to remain the majority, and then a few of your Wisbech types who are so far removed from it with their ideology they’ll never experience any of the negatives. There are positives, but we’ve gone in so heavy the negatives are outweighing the positives.

It won’t matter once we’re dead or dying because the younger generations will believe (been influenced by liberal brainwashing in schools) that everything is great. If that were true I’d agree. When they’re in shorts it won’t matter to them the problems they’ll experience achieving a fraction of their grandparents. Well it won’t to the more fortunate. Privileged they call it now. Privileged to not have to share with a teenage sibling of the opposite sex with every house split up will be our destination.

COYP