This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Jan 22 12.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pigglelet
Well if the ref is always going to (or be instructed to) accept the VAR decision, what the heck is the point of them wasting time reviewing the action on the pitch-side monitor? Is it to add to the excitement for the fans? It should be like in cricket where the Decision Review System is final. It would save a lot of time if the ref didn’t have to fanny about pretending he might actually uphold his original call. Or better still just scrap VAR. In the sport of cricket the DRS is based on factual information provided by technology, as it is for offsides in football. The VAR in the hub makes a subjective decision apropos penalties,serious foul play etc, before advising the match referee to review the decision he has made. Edited by Willo (27 Jan 2022 12.54pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pigglelet Deepest Darkest Sussex 27 Jan 22 1.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
In the sport of cricket the DRS is based on factual information provided by technology, as it is for offsides in football. The VAR in the hub makes a subjective decision apropos penalties,serious foul play etc, before advising the match referee to review the decision he has made. Edited by Willo (27 Jan 2022 12.54pm) Thank you, Willo. I refer you to my last sentence. On Sunday we had two debateable offside situations where apparently VAR didn't even get involved. Edited by Pigglelet (27 Jan 2022 1.05pm)
"Better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Jan 22 1.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pigglelet
Thank you, Willo. I refer you to my last sentence. On Sunday we had two debateable offside situations where apparently VAR didn't even get involved. Edited by Pigglelet (27 Jan 2022 1.05pm) In terms of the incident leading up to the second goal,maybe the VAR did notice that Firmino was offside but the ball sailed over his head and the VAR deemed he was not interfering with play.A subjective decision which of course has caused much controversy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 27 Jan 22 1.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
In terms of the incident leading up to the second goal,maybe the VAR did notice that Firmino was offside but the ball sailed over his head and the VAR deemed he was not interfering with play.A subjective decision which of course has caused much controversy. A subjective decision which was totally wrong according to the laws of the game
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 27 Jan 22 1.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
In terms of the incident leading up to the second goal,maybe the VAR did notice that Firmino was offside but the ball sailed over his head and the VAR deemed he was not interfering with play.A subjective decision which of course has caused much controversy. The guy was jumping toward the ball , it missed him by a mere fraction. The laws already deem that as offside . There is little subjective in the fact that he had taken his head to within an inch of the ball. If it had sailed over his head his feet would have been on the ground. It was offside the only thing that would make that subjective is whether to ignore it being offside.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Jan 22 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
A subjective decision which was totally wrong according to the laws of the game With subjective decisions there is always risk of inconsistencies and occasions when on reflection those making them might conclude that they had erred.Human beings make errors of judgement and I should know!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Jan 22 1.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
The guy was jumping toward the ball , it missed him by a mere fraction. The laws already deem that as offside . There is little subjective in the fact that he had taken his head to within an inch of the ball. If it had sailed over his head his feet would have been on the ground. It was offside the only thing that would make that subjective is whether to ignore it being offside. Clearly this would have been examined as part of the normal post-match forensic analysis of the officials performance. Quote : "Each Premier League match is evaluated by a former senior referee who scrutinises every decision using the match footage and event data to measure the officials’ technical performance. Former players and managers (Match Delegates) assess the accuracy and consistency of decision-making and their management of the match" Edited by Willo (27 Jan 2022 1.34pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 27 Jan 22 1.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
In the sport of cricket the DRS is based on factual information provided by technology, as it is for offsides in football. The VAR in the hub makes a subjective decision apropos penalties,serious foul play etc, before advising the match referee to review the decision he has made. Edited by Willo (27 Jan 2022 12.54pm) I think you mean 'change'. A thought from me, I remember quite well being in secondary school (sadly a while ago now) and we had a group of kids (10-30 or so) who were overly, or rather strangely, enthusiastic about football. The kind who would wear Italian 2nd division shirts to P.E. and could quote a variety of statistics/facts to you on any given subject, whether it be players, managers, their career paths, teams, their mascots, stadiums and so on. They all had one thing in common however, they were all 5h!t at football, to the extent that I think the vast, vast majority (if not all) never even played for a Sunday league side and actually, come to think of it, most supported Manure.. actually supported them despite being from South London - which I've never accepted, All useless at the game, never even played for a team, rarely if ever went to matches and in most cases (sadly) bullied at school. I hold nothing against these kids, they were happy in their own world so fair do's but I didn't want them ruining my fun whilst playing football or daring to lecture or in any way assume a better understanding of the game for which I had been a long standing season ticket holder (thanks Pops) and had regularly played, most of my young life, at a decent level. I get the impression that most referees have followed a similar path and it is infuriating. I find myself even getting angry watching neutral PL games these days, like Wolves vs Leicester or something, due to bewildering and worrying decision making from officials which screams at me their knowledge of football has come via a classroom as oppose to experience of the game. VAR has further exposed these mugs to the extent we now have an empty shell of a person officiating our games coming to the same wrong conclusions despite being able to review video based evidence and I expect a deterioration if not further increase of farcical decisions going forward. I will end and balance these thoughts by once again stating I believe Michael Oliver to be a very good referee. I am content to accept any human error on his behalf as he has my overriding trust as an official. The rest of them however are appaling, there's nothing wrong with VAR just the ignorant halfwits operating it. Having faith in a single referee is not enough and for me they're as much a plague and detriment to the game as anything else we have numerous campaigns against. I should sleep well tonight after that! As always - COYP
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 27 Jan 22 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
In terms of the incident leading up to the second goal,maybe the VAR did notice that Firmino was offside but the ball sailed over his head and the VAR deemed he was not interfering with play.A subjective decision which of course has caused much controversy.
I would also suggest that the ball didn't sail over Firmino's head, it barely cleared it!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Jan 22 2.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by doombear
I would also suggest that the ball didn't sail over Firmino's head, it barely cleared it! Offside offence interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or or gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent. A ‘save’ is when a player stops, or attempts to stop, a ball which is going into or very close to the goal with any part of the body except the hands/arms (unless the goalkeeper within the penalty area). In situations where: a player moving from, or standing in, an offside position is in the way of an opponent and interferes with the movement of the opponent towards the ball this is an offside offence if it impacts on the ability of the opponent to play or challenge for the ball; if the player moves into the way of an opponent and impedes the opponent's progress (e.g blocks the opponent) the offence should be penalised under Law 12 Edited by Willo (27 Jan 2022 2.17pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 27 Jan 22 2.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played by a team-mate can be penalised on becoming involved in active play by challenging for the ball. He challenged for the ball with Mitchell…..Offside no ifs or buts. Edited by Spiderman (27 Jan 2022 2.19pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CrazyBadger Ware 27 Jan 22 2.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
So Friend was only following orders? Pawson was the one who flagged it, and Friend knew he had an obligation to give the Penalty (in which case, why have a monitor at all!?) Sounds like we need a VAR collective of officials at Stockley park, rather than a singular person.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.