This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Painter Croydon 07 Nov 18 1.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So you think violence is the answer? Or maybe we should just start locking people up for looking at you in a funny way. Wow, you people really are the new fascists. I don’t think he thinks violence is the answer. He just doesn’t understand the difference between freedom of speech and abusive behaviour. Also doubt he is a fascist, wouldn’t know how too.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 07 Nov 18 1.39pm | |
---|---|
I went to see Jimmy Carr earlier this year.....f*** me you think that cardboard was offensive....nothing was sacred,he slaughters e everything.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 07 Nov 18 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
So we should waste energy? Those horrible Europeans making us save energy and money! Typical typical lefty
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 07 Nov 18 1.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
So if someone insulted you/your wife/your kids to your face would you just shrug it off and say 'yeah fair play mate, freedom of speech'? It takes a bigger man to walk away and in the main yes i would.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 07 Nov 18 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Very few from where I'm from would have neither.....Wow, we truly see the difference here. Anything else you want the state knocking on doors about? What's next, nasty rumours? 'He said/She said' gossip perhaps? Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Nov 2018 12.54pm) You've missed the point (imagine my shock etc.) I meant that words have consequences, whether people like it or not. People can say what they want, but not without expecting a reaction. (And no Hrolf, I was not advocating violence. I wouldn't harm a fly. Quite a feat to miss a point further than the main lad here)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 07 Nov 18 1.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Typical typical lefty Now, for clarity, your inference was that the cladding was erected because of EU policy about energy efficiency? So are you of the belief that were we not in the EU, we wouldn't have done it? I'd have thought being energy efficient and Investing in housing stock was just common sense. Blaming the EU because we ballsed it up is a little disingenuous
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 07 Nov 18 2.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
You've missed the point (imagine my shock etc.) I meant that words have consequences, whether people like it or not. People can say what they want, but not without expecting a reaction. (And no Hrolf, I was not advocating violence. I wouldn't harm a fly. Quite a feat to miss a point further than the main lad here) A reaction? So a verbal attack should be met with a verbal rebuff, not having your house burnt down. If there must be responsibility with speech then there must be equal responsibility with the response.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Nov 18 2.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
You've missed the point (imagine my shock etc.) I meant that words have consequences, whether people like it or not. People can say what they want, but not without expecting a reaction. (And no Hrolf, I was not advocating violence. I wouldn't harm a fly. Quite a feat to miss a point further than the main lad here)
As for consequences, I have no issues with 'reactions'. 'Reactions' have been what we have always had. It's only recently that the state has changed the law and enabled state involvement over 'opinion'. You appear to support them. I have massive issues with state involvement over opinions. Indeed many of these views were commonplace and are commonplace.....We are talking outright suppression. Never mind, when the cycle changes and it's people like yourself who find themselves focused upon you'll no doubt see it differently. I'll still support your freedom of speech.....but I'll remember your hypocrisy. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Nov 2018 2.04pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 07 Nov 18 2.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I agree......We are living in a regressive time. We have the dominant virtue signalling groups in power in society on both the left and right who are literally implementing moral fagging. Apparently people want to legally punish arseholes.....you aren't allowed to offend or be an idiot without PC Plod banging at your door. For those who believe in traditional freedom of speech these are not good times. This is a bit sensationalist. Also freedom of speech is still governed according to the law and has always had boundaries. This is not a new thing. How they're enforced is the problem, I'd agree there. But if you're suggesting Free Speech = Say anything you like without repercussion = traditional free speech then as you know you're wrong according to the law. But I suppose it doesn't suit the anti-establishment narrative/moany sensationalist thought police orwellian dross. When google gets embedded into our brains sometime this century then you might have a point. Where I agree is what was done is in no way illegal. Anyone with a rational brain and a basic grasp of the law knows that. Ignorant, feckless and disgusting, yes. Contrary to your belief, you are most certainly able to offend and be an idiot without being investigated. Pretty much everyone on this forum does it all the time. Do it in public with witnesses, or share something offensive on social media though? Then you're the real idiot. What is illegal is the sharing of the material over social media. The sharing of names in the papers is not great either, but once it's in the public domain... Karma is a bitch. If the racist element is either present or proven then they are definitely in the s***. Some of the soundbites coming out from their relatives do make me laugh. Much like the old 'but one of my friends is black' trope. 'He's such a good boy'. Everyones a w***er in private. Purely circumstantial but talking about 'the ninja is going to get it in a minute' doesn't help matters. You're free to be as idiotic and racist as you like in private, so long as you're with likeminded people and you don't share s*** on the internet, or do it in public in a way that will offend others. One enlightening fact is that under section 4A of the public order act, if there are two or more people witness to the event then it is prosecutable under the 'displaying a visual representation which is insulting', even if it's in your own home. However they're unlikely to complain about each other. Or maybe they will. That would be amazing. Will be interesting to follow this as a test case for some of the enshrined views by people on this forum on both 'sides' – my assumption is that they will get off with a fine or warning. The person that shared the video may get in more trouble with the law, and probably with their group as it's the only reason they're being exposed. The person who revealed their actual face rather than their public face with the 'ninja' comment could also be in a bit of s***. Other than that, on current evidence I can't see who else would get slammed. If they all get jailed without trial or evidence I'll craft my own special tin hat made from the very finest bacofoil. And they might have to move out of Norwood. Probably for the best.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Nov 18 2.39pm | |
---|---|
I'm not a free speech absolutist.....I have some respect for that position but I see the sense in not shouting 'bomb' on a packed tube train. We have never had free speech absolutism in this country. However, for most of our modern history we have quite rightly set the bar for impedance on speech as low as possible. Incitement to violence, libel and limited obscenity........that is what I mean by 'traditional' freedom of speech. This is about what the state should be involving itself with. Offence....being nasty..the subjectivity of 'feelings'....that has f*** all to do with the state and we are embarked on a path made by fools. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Nov 2018 2.42pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 07 Nov 18 3.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
This is a bit sensationalist. Also freedom of speech is still governed according to the law and has always had boundaries. This is not a new thing. How they're enforced is the problem, I'd agree there. But if you're suggesting Free Speech = Say anything you like without repercussion = traditional free speech then as you know you're wrong according to the law. But I suppose it doesn't suit the anti-establishment narrative/moany sensationalist thought police orwellian dross. When google gets embedded into our brains sometime this century then you might have a point. Where I agree is what was done is in no way illegal. Anyone with a rational brain and a basic grasp of the law knows that. Ignorant, feckless and disgusting, yes. Contrary to your belief, you are most certainly able to offend and be an idiot without being investigated. Pretty much everyone on this forum does it all the time. Do it in public with witnesses, or share something offensive on social media though? Then you're the real idiot. What is illegal is the sharing of the material over social media. The sharing of names in the papers is not great either, but once it's in the public domain... Karma is a bitch. If the racist element is either present or proven then they are definitely in the s***. Some of the soundbites coming out from their relatives do make me laugh. Much like the old 'but one of my friends is black' trope. 'He's such a good boy'. Everyones a w***er in private. Purely circumstantial but talking about 'the ninja is going to get it in a minute' doesn't help matters. You're free to be as idiotic and racist as you like in private, so long as you're with likeminded people and you don't share s*** on the internet, or do it in public in a way that will offend others. One enlightening fact is that under section 4A of the public order act, if there are two or more people witness to the event then it is prosecutable under the 'displaying a visual representation which is insulting', even if it's in your own home. However they're unlikely to complain about each other. Or maybe they will. That would be amazing. Will be interesting to follow this as a test case for some of the enshrined views by people on this forum on both 'sides' – my assumption is that they will get off with a fine or warning. The person that shared the video may get in more trouble with the law, and probably with their group as it's the only reason they're being exposed. The person who revealed their actual face rather than their public face with the 'ninja' comment could also be in a bit of s***. Other than that, on current evidence I can't see who else would get slammed. If they all get jailed without trial or evidence I'll craft my own special tin hat made from the very finest bacofoil. And they might have to move out of Norwood. Probably for the best. This is far too rational a post for this forum mate, come on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 07 Nov 18 3.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Now, for clarity, your inference was that the cladding was erected because of EU policy about energy efficiency? So are you of the belief that were we not in the EU, we wouldn't have done it? I'd have thought being energy efficient and Investing in housing stock was just common sense. Blaming the EU because we ballsed it up is a little disingenuous Again!!!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.