This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
silvertop Portishead 11 Aug 18 8.18am | |
---|---|
Ok you two. It was you saying i think i am more intelligent. I was just expressing a view. You seem as erudite and informed as me, albeit you have reached a different destination. This all seems to feed into what appears to be a world view that those who express views you deem "progressive" or "liberal" are all made by those who smugly look down on all you dumb proles.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 11 Aug 18 8.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You mentioned several but which is the first issue you wish to debate on that score?
Hmm the China thing. Is that where you went off on one on the wrong point. To recap. You: you're being so hard on Trump. Would you be so hard if the comments were made by the Russian or Chinese premiers? Me: It's not the same. The US president has considerably more impact on world events than both those leaders. And as for the Chinese premier, even though he leads an autocratic nation at least he thinks about what he says and appreciates the impact of his views You: I am supporting Chinese tyranny! It was at that point I bowed out
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 11 Aug 18 9.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
How do you deal with people who express opinions but are less intelligent than you? That is, when their views are clearly informed by ignorance or blind stupidity? Btw I will admit one error with further thought. Boris will take the top job through nakedly pandering to Tory grassroots. However, never forget his background. Once in situ he will revert to type and patrician politics and pragmatic balancing of his party's views will take over. Noone will hate him more than the so called grassroots who put him there and who will feel betrayed. Ok I read it again and you don't expressly state you are more intelligent, you actually ask a question and make a statement in one go.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 11 Aug 18 9.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Happy to be a d*ckhead in that case. It's not even funny. Well it would take one to know one , eh dan ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Aug 18 2.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Hmm the China thing. Is that where you went off on one on the wrong point. To recap. You: you're being so hard on Trump. Would you be so hard if the comments were made by the Russian or Chinese premiers? Me: It's not the same. The US president has considerably more impact on world events than both those leaders. And as for the Chinese premier, even though he leads an autocratic nation at least he thinks about what he says and appreciates the impact of his views You: I am supporting Chinese tyranny! It was at that point I bowed out I didn't say you were supporting tyranny, I was accusing you of ignorance and a lack of balance....Which aren't great attributes of someone who thinks they are more intelligent than the masses. The US has considerably more impact on world events than China and Russia? Yes, in a positive fashion it has. Yet you only had criticism for Trump when in reality he heads a state that is the pinnacle and is currently helping improve the world economy. Explain to me how China doesn't have a massive impact on the world. China, the second largest economy in the world, which is projected to overtake the US sits on the UN security council and has huge impacts around the world, especially in its region and Africa. Russia, which I didn't focus upon, still has considerable impact. You bowed out because your central point showed a lack of ability to acknowledge balance between Trump and the far far worst impacts of non western world leaders. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Aug 2018 2.38pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Aug 18 2.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Ok you two. It was you saying i think i am more intelligent. I was just expressing a view. You seem as erudite and informed as me, albeit you have reached a different destination. This all seems to feed into what appears to be a world view that those who express views you deem "progressive" or "liberal" are all made by those who smugly look down on all you dumb proles. You wrote, 'How do you deal with people who express opinions but are less intelligent than you? That is, when their views are clearly informed by ignorance or blind stupidity?' So then are you suggesting our conclusions are wrong and that you weren't suggesting you are more intelligent than those you deem to support 'populist' ideas? You seemingly ignored my offer to debate any of these 'populist' ideas. Cool, no problem. The reality is that those policy ideas you mentioned are worldviews and cultural and have zero connection to the intelligence of the individual who believes in them.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 12 Aug 18 2.20am | |
---|---|
Funny when the Guardian jokes about the Burka, it's OK? [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
cryrst The garden of England 12 Aug 18 9.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Funny when the Guardian jokes about the Burka, it's OK? [Link] Best some people complain that it is racist and islamaphobic then the guardian will get investigated and brought before a panel like boris.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 12 Aug 18 11.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Best some people complain that it is racist and islamaphobic then the guardian will get investigated and brought before a panel like boris. .... but it has been written by a Moslem woman who wears a hijab, so it would be taken in the same way that blacks are permitted call each other by the 'n' word whilst the rest of us may not use it under any circumstances.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 12 Aug 18 1.01pm | |
---|---|
Probably the Guardian's most notable columnist, Polly Toynbee, talks about the burqa in 2001. [Link] "The top-to-toe burka, with its sinister, airless little grille, is more than an instrument of persecution, it is a public tarring and feathering of female sexuality. It transforms any woman into an object of defilement too untouchably disgusting to be seen. It is a garment of lurid sexual suggestiveness: what rampant desire and desirability lurks and leers beneath its dark mysteries? In its objectifying of women, it turns them into cowering creatures demanding and expecting violence and victimisation. Forget cultural sensibilities." Is she an Islamaphobe for criticising the burqa? Does she have free speech here? Or is it one rule for the left and another for Tories?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Aug 18 6.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Probably the Guardian's most notable columnist, Polly Toynbee, talks about the burqa in 2001. [Link] "The top-to-toe burka, with its sinister, airless little grille, is more than an instrument of persecution, it is a public tarring and feathering of female sexuality. It transforms any woman into an object of defilement too untouchably disgusting to be seen. It is a garment of lurid sexual suggestiveness: what rampant desire and desirability lurks and leers beneath its dark mysteries? In its objectifying of women, it turns them into cowering creatures demanding and expecting violence and victimisation. Forget cultural sensibilities." Is she an Islamaphobe for criticising the burqa? Does she have free speech here? Or is it one rule for the left and another for Tories? It is our duty as a nation to drag Britsh subjects of devout religious backgrounds into the 21st century. The idiot apologists seem to want the reverse.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 13 Aug 18 10.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I didn't say you were supporting tyranny, I was accusing you of ignorance and a lack of balance....Which aren't great attributes of someone who thinks they are more intelligent than the masses. The US has considerably more impact on world events than China and Russia? Yes, in a positive fashion it has. Yet you only had criticism for Trump when in reality he heads a state that is the pinnacle and is currently helping improve the world economy. Explain to me how China doesn't have a massive impact on the world. China, the second largest economy in the world, which is projected to overtake the US sits on the UN security council and has huge impacts around the world, especially in its region and Africa. Russia, which I didn't focus upon, still has considerable impact. You bowed out because your central point showed a lack of ability to acknowledge balance between Trump and the far far worst impacts of non western world leaders. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Aug 2018 2.38pm) This one was in response to you saying that we were all being hard on Trump. We wouldn't be so hard if the Russian or Chinese premiers were shooting from the hip. I replied that they don't: even effective dictators like them measure their comments
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.