I don't recall holf asking you if you have an issue with muslims in total.
What is being asked is whether you agree with some of the strange and very dangerous beliefs.
If indeed it is proved that this attack was based around their beliefs and they deemed that this punishment was correct.
The same as slating this Mohammed character is deserving of death.( Charlie hebdo)
Do you maple not find that a tad harsh and basically wrong.
I don't think it is a difficult question, unless of course you agree with it.

You must be a nightmare filling out forms Maple

You cannot answer a single straightforward question.

So are you telling me that you have a balanced view of the Nazis because they did a few things right and some of them were very friendly at dinner parties and that the killing 6 million Jews business has to be looked at in that context?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (27 Jul 2018 2.16pm)

One cannot have it both ways. One is either able to criticise specific aspects of something without condemning anyone or anything connected to it or not.

I'm sorry but the limitation being placed on me by this yellow card stuff is making me disinclined to bother posting.
I can no longer have a natural conversation with you as a result. Best of luck.

You appear to be saying I think that someone has a right to have acid poured over a child due to their faith.

No faith would give that right and to date I have seen no claim it was done using faith as an excuse. I guess it was a wicked man who paid people with zero morals to do his dirty work.

If you believe Islam gives draconian rights such as that I can only suggest you ask a Muslim to explain

As I have said before, you may get different answers from different Muslims - as with the Bible there are varying interpretations of Islamic scriptures.

I hardly think there is a conspiracy against right wing posters on the HOL. You would no doubt find the BBS inhospitable though.

i have worked with some seriously nice ones, and also some seriously nasty ones.

is it statistically significant ?

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Maple kind of misses the point.

Ultimately the biggest problem isn't in how many nice normal Muslims there are compared to poor ones. There are good and bad in every group and it's always a percentage question...even though our prisons have more than double the national percentage of Muslims in them.

The point is at the group macro level.....Meaning that as a large majority they act and vote as a political block in non Muslim countries. Where they aren't the majority they want rights, where they are the majority rights are in shorter supply.

It suits their interests to always vote left at the moment...It's not going to be every Muslim but it's going to be a high majority....even though amusingly they are a majority socially conservative group. However, as the group demographics increase they will change that voting preference to their own 'Muslim Brotherhood' type party.

This is about twenty to thirty years down the line but it's going to happen. It's as predictable as the sun rising and it's all the fault of the left and the economic right.

I'm secular and I'll be long gone, but this is a situation that the ideologically idealistic have given to my children and their generation and the outcome is uncertain.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Jul 2018 2.36pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)