This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 07 Mar 18 8.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Leo X was the idiot that thought indulgences were a good idea. His stupidity was rewarded with the Protestant Reformation. He had no further to look than Matt. 21 : 12 - 17 to know what Jesus thought of the idea of turning the Church into a commercial enterprise. Even many Catholics I've spoken to accept that Martin Luther had a point. Edited by chateauferret (07 Mar 2018 7.23pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ex hibitionist Hastings 07 Mar 18 8.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sprites
I'd consider myself a pretty devout Christian, although possibly slightly more liberal now than I've been in the past. I don't reeeeally appreciate being called weak of mind or a gullible mug. I'd actually venture to say with all the things going on in the world, it takes a lot more strength to believe in God than not. And to be a Christian in today's world, with the perpetual ridicule from people much like you. Takes a lot of strength and resolve. To me, weak of mind is just accepting what we see, without exploring any deeper. And weak characters take the path of least resistance, which in today's age, is the 'there's no god, live for the now, look out for number one' attitude towards life. I certainly don't have all the answers. In fact, I don't have many at all. But I'm a strong minded, smart, friendly, respectful person...and I believe in God. Just my two cents. Ta good for you my friend, it's the OP here, you are actually respecting the thread - it's about Christians not Christianity - I respect the religion it's just I've too regularly found a certain type of Christian who is judgemental, petty authoritarian and creepy - I think these tend to veer more towards evangelicalism. A lot of the debate here is old hat - there are many who believe in a non-personal god, the bearded spouter of old english perched behind the clouds is as dead as Nietszche said he was - it actually takes a leap of faith to be an atheist - you have to presume existence emanates or emanated from scientific law then accept that this law pre-existed the universe, you make this law God-like. Being open to forces we don't understand does not make you believe in plagues of frogs or the efficacy of mass infanticide. So there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Mar 18 8.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
good for you my friend, it's the OP here, you are actually respecting the thread - it's about Christians not Christianity - I respect the religion it's just I've too regularly found a certain type of Christian who is judgemental, petty authoritarian and creepy - I think these tend to veer more towards evangelicalism. A lot of the debate here is old hat - there are many who believe in a non-personal god, the bearded spouter of old english perched behind the clouds is as dead as Nietszche said he was - it actually takes a leap of faith to be an atheist - you have to presume existence emanates or emanated from scientific law then accept that this law pre-existed the universe, you make this law God-like. Being open to forces we don't understand does not make you believe in plagues of frogs or the efficacy of mass infanticide. So there. It takes no 'faith' to be an atheist. Faith requires you to believe in something without evidence. An atheist simply says that there is no good evidence to believe in a god or gods. It requires no other addition. What you put forward about 'laws' is neither here nor there nor knowable. Personally I'm an agnostic atheist.......meaning that having faith in impossible to know nor provable beliefs is the act of an irrational person.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 07 Mar 18 9.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
good for you my friend, it's the OP here, you are actually respecting the thread - it's about Christians not Christianity - I respect the religion it's just I've too regularly found a certain type of Christian who is judgemental, petty authoritarian and creepy - I think these tend to veer more towards evangelicalism. A lot of the debate here is old hat - there are many who believe in a non-personal god, the bearded spouter of old english perched behind the clouds is as dead as Nietszche said he was - it actually takes a leap of faith to be an atheist - you have to presume existence emanates or emanated from scientific law then accept that this law pre-existed the universe, you make this law God-like. Being open to forces we don't understand does not make you believe in plagues of frogs or the efficacy of mass infanticide. So there. Once again, those are not Christians. A plague of frogs is a perfectly possible, albeit unusual, effect of deoxification of the water (the Nile). That it was immediately preceded by the killing of the fish in the river supports that. The other plagues of Egypt were also evidently natural phenomena that the people, knowing no better, ascribed to divine forces. The rain of fire and the three-day darkness for example were probably caused by the Minoan eruption of Thera, at what is now Santorini, c. 1630-1600 BC. Similarly, Sodom and Gommorah were probably destroyed not by "God's wrath" but by a bolide that sliced the top off the Gamskogel, slammed at a rather oblique angle into the western side of the Oetztal near what is now the village of Umhausen in the Tyrol, and (among other things) threw molten fragments into the air which rained down over eastern Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Since observers knew the inhabitants' conduct had been disgraceful, and knew nothing of near-earth asteroid trajectories, they will have interpreted this as divine retribution. This event is dated to about 3000 BC. (By comparison, there were many contemporary explanations offered for the Tsunguska impact in Siberia in 1908, which we know now to have been the airborne explosion of an office-block sized iron meteorite, but there was enough science around by then to determine that it was not the deliberate act of an angry deity. Some of them did however implicate supposed alien spacecraft crews).
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 07 Mar 18 9.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It takes no 'faith' to be an atheist. Faith requires you to believe in something without evidence. An atheist simply says that there is no good evidence to believe in a god or gods. It requires no other addition. What you put forward about 'laws' is neither here nor there nor knowable. Personally I'm an agnostic atheist.......meaning that having faith in impossible to know nor provable beliefs is the act of an irrational person.
I find it amusing to read so many people here pointing out the folly of faith when Palace Talk is hoaching with the very opposite view!
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 07 Mar 18 9.54pm | |
---|---|
I thought Christians was an early brand of cat food? ... feeding "Christians" to the lions. Edited by Henry of Peckham (09 Mar 2018 12.00am)
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sprites Auckland 08 Mar 18 12.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Once again, those are not Christians. A plague of frogs is a perfectly possible, albeit unusual, effect of deoxification of the water (the Nile). That it was immediately preceded by the killing of the fish in the river supports that. The other plagues of Egypt were also evidently natural phenomena that the people, knowing no better, ascribed to divine forces. The rain of fire and the three-day darkness for example were probably caused by the Minoan eruption of Thera, at what is now Santorini, c. 1630-1600 BC. Similarly, Sodom and Gommorah were probably destroyed not by "God's wrath" but by a bolide that sliced the top off the Gamskogel, slammed at a rather oblique angle into the western side of the Oetztal near what is now the village of Umhausen in the Tyrol, and (among other things) threw molten fragments into the air which rained down over eastern Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Since observers knew the inhabitants' conduct had been disgraceful, and knew nothing of near-earth asteroid trajectories, they will have interpreted this as divine retribution. This event is dated to about 3000 BC. (By comparison, there were many contemporary explanations offered for the Tsunguska impact in Siberia in 1908, which we know now to have been the airborne explosion of an office-block sized iron meteorite, but there was enough science around by then to determine that it was not the deliberate act of an angry deity. Some of them did however implicate supposed alien spacecraft crews). Pretty big call. I think that's possibly too black and white. Christian = a follower of Christ, yes? People can do that with varying degrees of success, don't you think? A top of mind example might be: comparing it to a striker. The main focus for a Striker is to score goals. Benteke isn't scoring many at the moment. Doesn't suddenly mean he's not a striker....more that he's just not doing the best job right now. Ashamedly, I look back at my teenage years and I've suddenly had my judgemental moments. Didn't necessarily mean I wasn't christian at that point....just wasn't doing the best job at removing the plank from my own eye, first.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 08 Mar 18 1.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sprites
Pretty big call. I think that's possibly too black and white. Christian = a follower of Christ, yes? People can do that with varying degrees of success, don't you think? A top of mind example might be: comparing it to a striker. The main focus for a Striker is to score goals. Benteke isn't scoring many at the moment. Doesn't suddenly mean he's not a striker....more that he's just not doing the best job right now. Ashamedly, I look back at my teenage years and I've suddenly had my judgemental moments. Didn't necessarily mean I wasn't christian at that point....just wasn't doing the best job at removing the plank from my own eye, first. Following Christ to perfection is not possible, of course, but we are expected to strive to come as close to His Example as we can. There are varying degrees of falling short, as you say, but there is also outright hypocrisy, people who instead of repenting of their sin try to justify it by claiming that what they are doing is actually good and mandated by God, typically citing some tenuous reference to some Old Testament reference as "evidence". They probably start out by following the "broad and easy path" (Matt. 7 : 13-14) which leads them astray, not because they are actively evil at the outset, but because they lack application or are easily led. The parable of the sower breaks this down further (Matt. 13 : 1-23). Edited by chateauferret (08 Mar 2018 1.59am)
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
twist Miami, Florida 08 Mar 18 4.04am | |
---|---|
I dont know how you can generalize a group of people and label them something or other, by color, sexuality, spiritual beliefs, age, size or just about anything else. Cubans are the exception
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 08 Mar 18 6.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
I find it amusing to read so many people here pointing out the folly of faith when Palace Talk is hoaching with the very opposite view! I think on this we can concur. It's a relegation risking season, lots of bad injuries and poor form by key players. Lots of losing games in the last ten minutes instead of winning them. We can survive but us going down wouldn't surprise me.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 08 Mar 18 8.32am | |
---|---|
Christians awake ! Salute the happy morn!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 08 Mar 18 9.01am | |
---|---|
Few of us will get through life without at least one major crisis. In despair nobody to help or turn to. How does any human being react? 'God, please help me!'
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.