The Right-Wing are less intelligent...

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Right-Wing are less intelligent...

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 9 of 14 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Stirlingsays 14 Jun 17 12.49pm
Originally posted by Part Time James Shouldn't it be "The Right-Wing are fewer intelligent"? Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

14 Jun 17 12.49pm

Originally posted by Part Time James

Shouldn't it be "The Right-Wing are fewer intelligent"?

Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 14 Jun 17 12.50pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 And on England Day ban all kids with Labour-voting parents or funny sounding surnames from crossing the border that is the school gate. And on Labour Day, hold an election for Head Boy/Girl and then claim that the kid who came second won it. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 14 Jun 17 12.50pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

And on England Day ban all kids with Labour-voting parents or funny sounding surnames from crossing the border that is the school gate.

And on Labour Day, hold an election for Head Boy/Girl and then claim that the kid who came second won it.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 14 Jun 17 12.50pm
Originally posted by Part Time James Shouldn't it be "The Right-Wing are fewer intelligent"? only from you "Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin

Where you have to have an English ... 14 Jun 17 12.50pm

Originally posted by Part Time James

Shouldn't it be "The Right-Wing are fewer intelligent"?

only from you

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 14 Jun 17 12.50pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger The current Labour Party is as far left as it has been for years, if not ever, and it shares many of it's ideals with Communism. You only need to look at communist web sites to see how delighted they are with Jeremy Corbyn. Absolute hogwash. Labour was far more to the left overall under Keir Hardie,the 1945 manifesto and the 1983 manifesto.Indeed,there were things the Blair government did that were to "the left" of what was in the current manifesto. Jamie is right about the hypocrisy. If "communists" being happy about the direction of the Labour Party presently no more makes it a communist party than fascists in the USA being happy with the Republican Party under Trump making the Republicans a fascist party.Be careful or you may give credence to the theory posted about by the OP.
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

14 Jun 17 12.50pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The current Labour Party is as far left as it has been for years, if not ever, and it shares many of it's ideals with Communism. You only need to look at communist web sites to see how delighted they are with Jeremy Corbyn.

Absolute hogwash.

Labour was far more to the left overall under Keir Hardie,the 1945 manifesto and the 1983 manifesto.Indeed,there were things the Blair government did that were to "the left" of what was in the current manifesto.

Jamie is right about the hypocrisy. If "communists" being happy about the direction of the Labour Party presently no more makes it a communist party than fascists in the USA being happy with the Republican Party under Trump making the Republicans a fascist party.Be careful or you may give credence to the theory posted about by the OP.

Alert a moderator to this post

Part Time James 14 Jun 17 12.50pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is. I was on a wind up. It definitely isn't "fewer". I thought I'd ignore all the sensible argument and say something useless for once.
Alert a moderator to this post

Part Time James

14 Jun 17 12.50pm

Send a Private Message to Part Time James

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is.

I was on a wind up. It definitely isn't "fewer". I thought I'd ignore all the sensible argument and say something useless for once.

Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 14 Jun 17 12.51pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is. Is that the National now being less important than the Socialism? "Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin

Where you have to have an English ... 14 Jun 17 12.51pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is.

Is that the National now being less important than the Socialism?

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 14 Jun 17 12.52pm
Originally posted by Part Time James I was on a wind up. It definitely isn't "fewer". I thought I'd ignore all the sensible argument and say something useless for once. The "fewer" is "more" approach?
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

14 Jun 17 12.52pm

Originally posted by Part Time James

I was on a wind up. It definitely isn't "fewer". I thought I'd ignore all the sensible argument and say something useless for once.

The "fewer" is "more" approach?

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 14 Jun 17 12.59pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is. 'Fewer' is used for items that can be actually counted, eg 'Labour won fewer seats than the Conservatives'. 'Less' is used for something not countable, eg 'There is less beer in this glass than there is in that one'. Supermarkets that have '8 items or less' checkouts are using grammar incorrectly. Hope this helps. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 14 Jun 17 12.59pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Interesting point...but I think 'the right-wing' is sufficiently vague to enable 'less'....Lots of Ukip voters voted Labour this time around. It's hard to count what exactly 'right-wing' is.

'Fewer' is used for items that can be actually counted, eg 'Labour won fewer seats than the Conservatives'.

'Less' is used for something not countable, eg 'There is less beer in this glass than there is in that one'.

Supermarkets that have '8 items or less' checkouts are using grammar incorrectly.

Hope this helps.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

Part Time James 14 Jun 17 1.09pm
Originally posted by Cucking Funt 'Fewer' is used for items that can be actually counted, eg 'Labour won fewer seats than the Conservatives'. 'Less' is used for something not countable, eg 'There is less beer in this glass than there is in that one'. Supermarkets that have '8 items or less' checkouts are using grammar incorrectly. Hope this helps. For the record, this was my joke but it's gotten out of control.
Alert a moderator to this post

Part Time James

14 Jun 17 1.09pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

'Fewer' is used for items that can be actually counted, eg 'Labour won fewer seats than the Conservatives'.

'Less' is used for something not countable, eg 'There is less beer in this glass than there is in that one'.

Supermarkets that have '8 items or less' checkouts are using grammar incorrectly.

Hope this helps.

For the record, this was my joke but it's gotten out of control.

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 14 Jun 17 1.11pm
Originally posted by legaleagle Absolute hogwash. Labour was far more to the left overall under Keir Hardie, the 1945 manifesto and the 1983 manifesto.Indeed,there were things the Blair government did that were to "the left" of what was in the current manifesto. Jamie is right about the hypocrisy. If "communists" being happy about the direction of the Labour Party presently no more makes it a communist party than fascists in the USA being happy with the Republican Party under Trump making the Republicans a fascist party.Be careful or you may give credence to the theory posted about by the OP. Attlee and Bevin were very anti-communist, Foot and Benn less so, but Corbyn and McDonnell are fellow-travellers, Trotskyites in Labour clothing. We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 14 Jun 17 1.11pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

Absolute hogwash.

Labour was far more to the left overall under Keir Hardie, the 1945 manifesto and the 1983 manifesto.Indeed,there were things the Blair government did that were to "the left" of what was in the current manifesto.

Attlee and Bevin were very anti-communist, Foot and Benn less so, but Corbyn and McDonnell are fellow-travellers, Trotskyites in Labour clothing.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 14 Jun 17 1.12pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Nope, because of the historical connotations of white people blacking up, makes it kind of more potentially offensive than people dressing up as a French stereotype. Doesn't that fit the definition of racism? Not that I'm saying you are racist of course...just that you highlight that it's ok to treat different groups differently upon some historical guilt. Personally I think these judgements are far too sensitive and are restrictions on freedom of expression based upon historical judgements over whole groups....whole groups damn it. I don't believe my relatives owned slaves. Even if they did My skin colour shouldn't define me. This concept that we can have different rules of engagement due to someone's skin colour fits the definition. You have your 'right on' racism and you have your 'demonised' racism. It isn't objective. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2017 1.12pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

14 Jun 17 1.12pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Nope, because of the historical connotations of white people blacking up, makes it kind of more potentially offensive than people dressing up as a French stereotype.

Doesn't that fit the definition of racism?

Not that I'm saying you are racist of course...just that you highlight that it's ok to treat different groups differently upon some historical guilt.

Personally I think these judgements are far too sensitive and are restrictions on freedom of expression based upon historical judgements over whole groups....whole groups damn it.

I don't believe my relatives owned slaves. Even if they did My skin colour shouldn't define me.

This concept that we can have different rules of engagement due to someone's skin colour fits the definition.

You have your 'right on' racism and you have your 'demonised' racism. It isn't objective.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2017 1.12pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 14 Jun 17 1.13pm
Originally posted by Part Time James For the record, this was my joke but it's gotten out of control. This is the HOL. Things always get out of control. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 14 Jun 17 1.13pm

Originally posted by Part Time James

For the record, this was my joke but it's gotten out of control.

This is the HOL. Things always get out of control.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 9 of 14 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Right-Wing are less intelligent...

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors