This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 3.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by miss smith
it will be us that will end up humiliated ,i have pals who brighton fans and even they can not stand the [i support brighton but my first club chelsea man u etc etc mob ]that makes up 2/3 s of there support ,but the media will try and make an example of us over this issue, that will bring our club into disrepute ,we all know its just banter but it will blown out of proportion Accusing their fans of supporting two clubs will not bring us into disrepute. No way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
miss smith london 21 Apr 17 3.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Accusing their fans of supporting two clubs will not bring us into disrepute. No way. that was not the point i was making ,ffs Edited by miss smith (21 Apr 2017 3.42pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 3.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by miss smith
that was not the point i was making ,ffs Edited by miss smith (21 Apr 2017 3.42pm) Ah ok, apologies, I misunderstood. No need to put ffs though, you should calm down a little.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
miss smith london 21 Apr 17 3.53pm | |
---|---|
sorry about the ffs
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 3.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by miss smith
sorry about the ffs Haha no bother! I did wonder after I replied whether I'd got the wrong end of the stick. Now I know!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 21 Apr 17 3.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by miss smith
sorry about the ffs Isn't a "FFS" mandatory in any discussion involving Palace and Brighton?
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bangell Oxford 21 Apr 17 3.58pm | |
---|---|
After navigating through moral outrage and discussions of paedophilia, page 9 of this thread has turned unexpectedly polite
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Isn't a "FFS" mandatory in any discussion involving Palace and Brighton? yes, it could've been a sign off. Is Miss Smith actually Glenn spying on us?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bangell
After navigating through moral outrage and discussions of paedophilia, page 9 of this thread has turned unexpectedly polite Give it 5 minutes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 21 Apr 17 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Ah ok, apologies, I misunderstood. No need to put ffs though, you should calm down a little. I am disappointed, I thought you were being er well, being you
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 4.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
I am disappointed, I thought you were being er well, being you You mean deliberately missing a point in order to get a cheap laugh? No, sadly not in this instance. This time I was just genuinely confused.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 21 Apr 17 4.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
In a way, who we prefer to f***, is all "fetish". Someone who is gay, is capable of moderating their sexuality and behaviour to acceptable social norms and restriction - and is compulsive or obsessively attracted to specific characteristics of masculinity only. Also they establish relationships of flexibility (i.e. long term relationships, emotional and psychological attachments)- where as the pedo is ONLY interested in the age of their victim. Paedophiles seem to be fixated on specific aspects of youth (technically a pederast is someone who acts on those fixations) - Typically young pre-pubescent children. Which is why its a fetish, the desire tends to be not about preferences, but of necessity. Obviously its not true of all child sex offenders, but when we're talking about the 'hardwired' type, its very different that seen in gay and lesbianism. The desire is typically for a male or female, without real regard for the interests or pleasure of their partner and within a specific age band. That's very different from sexuality - which tends to be expressive, towards mutual ends and reasonably empathic. Where as paedophilia is effectively the fetishiation of the individual to the gratification of the offender. Its the youth element that important. Even when homosexuality was illegal - the expression of the vast majority was for mutual consensual pleasure and relationships - With an empathic understanding of the needs and interests of their partners.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.