This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
iheartcpfc SE25 12 Dec 15 1.50am | |
---|---|
Quote -TUX- at 11 Dec 2015 7.35pm
Quote iheartcpfc at 11 Dec 2015 5.08pm
Quote -TUX- at 09 Dec 2015 8.15pm
Trump saying what many feel but can't quite muster up the balls to say it i guess?
Apparently it's 'da', not 'tha'. i'll hand my passport in in the morning
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 12 Dec 15 12.34pm | |
---|---|
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
snytaxx London 13 Dec 15 6.36am | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere. Think this is a very sensible post. I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition. For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him. The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then... Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron! No to pointless petitions and legislation...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 13 Dec 15 10.10am | |
---|---|
Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere. Think this is a very sensible post. I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition. For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him. The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then... Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron! No to pointless petitions and legislation...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Dec 15 12.20pm | |
---|---|
Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere. Think this is a very sensible post. I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition. For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him. The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then... Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron! No to pointless petitions and legislation... Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA. Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 13 Dec 15 3.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Dec 2015 12.20pm
Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere. Think this is a very sensible post. I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition. For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him. The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then... Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron! No to pointless petitions and legislation... Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA. Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NickRobinson 13 Dec 15 3.48pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Dec 2015 3.33pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Dec 2015 12.20pm
Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere. Think this is a very sensible post. I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition. For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him. The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then... Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron! No to pointless petitions and legislation... Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA. Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
It is happening in Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary and Poland too. People are waking up to the disastrous policies that the lib/left has inflicted on them - uncontrolled immigration, tolerance of Islamic extremism, the lunacy of the Euro and the EU in general. The Islamic bit is ironic really as the liberals are being punished for their support of the least liberal of ideologies, Islam.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 13 Dec 15 4.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? ..................................................... How could anyone but a ludicrous bleeding heart liberal think it was that bad? And we all know it was their stupid ideas that got us in this mess,anyway.
Lets apply it to the UK.I know, lets ban the overseas-based musician Richard Thompson from returning.After all,he's a muslim and we all know what they're all like. Also,lets not forget the various muslims working for the Met and other police forces.Keep them out if they need to go abroad to an anti-terrorism conference. Lets ban rising Tory MP Sajid Javid or one of the other 15 muslim MPsfrom returning if he goes to an international meeting.Don't leave Syed Kamall, Tory MEP for London out... Not forgetting TV journalists/presenters like Lisa Aziz and Faisal Islam Finally,lets not forget any of the various leading UK muslim boxers and cricketers whenever they go abroad. Don't leave out muslim footballers playing in the UK: Chamakh. Kurt Zouma,Yaya Sanago,Fellaini,Janujaz,Sagna,Nasri,Ya Ya Toure,Chadli,Guedioura I mean,they're all muslims,so they must all be dodgy and excluded,no?If Kuqi ever tries to pay a visit,don't let him in.He's "one of them" too. Finally,lets not forget what secret agent Trump's real achievement is and will be:to contribute to the very thing the salafist jihadists want most:to drive all muslims into their camp by hoping our reaction to terrorism will be to create a wedge between muslims generally and others.Anjem Choudary no doubt loves Dear Old Donald for that very reason. Trump's idiocy that bad? No,its not that bad,I agree...its a lot lot more bad (and plain dumb) than that... Edited by legaleagle (13 Dec 2015 4.21pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 13 Dec 15 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Turns out that Trump's dad was a KKKlansman and arrested for having a barney aided by 1,000 other violent pillow headed w@nkers with NYPD back in the day. Chip off the old block is our Donald it appears. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Dec 2015 4.35pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 13 Dec 15 6.17pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 13 Dec 2015 4.21pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? ..................................................... How could anyone but a ludicrous bleeding heart liberal think it was that bad? And we all know it was their stupid ideas that got us in this mess,anyway.
Lets apply it to the UK.I know, lets ban the overseas-based musician Richard Thompson from returning.After all,he's a muslim and we all know what they're all like. Also,lets not forget the various muslims working for the Met and other police forces.Keep them out if they need to go abroad to an anti-terrorism conference. Lets ban rising Tory MP Sajid Javid or one of the other 15 muslim MPsfrom returning if he goes to an international meeting.Don't leave Syed Kamall, Tory MEP for London out... Not forgetting TV journalists/presenters like Lisa Aziz and Faisal Islam Finally,lets not forget any of the various leading UK muslim boxers and cricketers whenever they go abroad. Don't leave out muslim footballers playing in the UK: Chamakh. Kurt Zouma,Yaya Sanago,Fellaini,Janujaz,Sagna,Nasri,Ya Ya Toure,Chadli,Guedioura I mean,they're all muslims,so they must all be dodgy and excluded,no?If Kuqi ever tries to pay a visit,don't let him in.He's "one of them" too. Finally,lets not forget what secret agent Trump's real achievement is and will be:to contribute to the very thing the salafist jihadists want most:to drive all muslims into their camp by hoping our reaction to terrorism will be to create a wedge between muslims generally and others.Anjem Choudary no doubt loves Dear Old Donald for that very reason. Trump's idiocy that bad? No,its not that bad,I agree...its a lot lot more bad (and plain dumb) than that... Edited by legaleagle (13 Dec 2015 4.21pm)
I feel that as that even on here where people argue about Islam, they argue from a point of view of ignorance.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 13 Dec 15 8.27pm | |
---|---|
Blanket ban on adherents to the wahabbi strain of Islam per se,including US/UK citizens? No.Same silliness road as what Trump actually said. And,yes ,you are right,there can be degrees of ignorance (including my own) and I appreciate "salafist jihadis" may not be a correct term either to others or objectively,though its mine in describing the ideology espoused (as I understand it) by those presently carrying out wanton terrorist acts. Edited by legaleagle (13 Dec 2015 8.27pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 13 Dec 15 8.38pm | |
---|---|
Quote NickRobinson at 13 Dec 2015 3.48pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Dec 2015 3.33pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Dec 2015 12.20pm
Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm
Was Trump's outburst really that bad? At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests. We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria. Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control. Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above. What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere. Think this is a very sensible post. I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition. For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him. The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then... Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron! No to pointless petitions and legislation... Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA. Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
It is happening in Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary and Poland too. People are waking up to the disastrous policies that the lib/left has inflicted on them - uncontrolled immigration, tolerance of Islamic extremism, the lunacy of the Euro and the EU in general. The Islamic bit is ironic really as the liberals are being punished for their support of the least liberal of ideologies, Islam.
Maybe next time. Here's to you, Mr Robinson Edited by Kermit8 (13 Dec 2015 8.40pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.