You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Donald Trump
November 22 2024 11.03pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Donald Trump

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 13 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

  

iheartcpfc Flag SE25 12 Dec 15 1.50am Send a Private Message to iheartcpfc Add iheartcpfc as a friend

Quote -TUX- at 11 Dec 2015 7.35pm

Quote iheartcpfc at 11 Dec 2015 5.08pm

Quote -TUX- at 09 Dec 2015 8.15pm

Trump saying what many feel but can't quite muster up the balls to say it i guess?
Many here can't decide which side of the 'PC fence' they want to sit on.

That's the real issue.


"he only says wot tha people r finking innit"

Apparently it's 'da', not 'tha'.

i'll hand my passport in in the morning

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 12 Dec 15 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
snytaxx Flag London 13 Dec 15 6.36am Send a Private Message to snytaxx Add snytaxx as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

Think this is a very sensible post.

I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition.

For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him.

The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then...

Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron!

No to pointless petitions and legislation...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 13 Dec 15 10.10am

Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

Think this is a very sensible post.

I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition.

For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him.

The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then...

Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron!

No to pointless petitions and legislation...


Yep.... good analogy with the neighbours party and we don't need to burn any bridges now - lets keep our powder dry!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Dec 15 12.20pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

Think this is a very sensible post.

I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition.

For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him.

The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then...

Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron!

No to pointless petitions and legislation...

Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA.

Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
I just wonder how many innocent civilians will have to be killed in the West before our safety starts to become more of an issue that the rights of Muslims in peoples minds and Trump's attitude gains more support. It would be a great tragedy if more terrorism created an atmosphere of anti Muslim sentiment but in the final analysis the majority of people will put their personal safety and that of their loved ones first.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 13 Dec 15 3.33pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Dec 2015 12.20pm

Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

Think this is a very sensible post.

I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition.

For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him.

The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then...

Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron!

No to pointless petitions and legislation...

Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA.

Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
I just wonder how many innocent civilians will have to be killed in the West before our safety starts to become more of an issue that the rights of Muslims in peoples minds and Trump's attitude gains more support. It would be a great tragedy if more terrorism created an atmosphere of anti Muslim sentiment but in the final analysis the majority of people will put their personal safety and that of their loved ones first.


... Probably explains France's switch to vote for right-wing candidates in the most recent elections?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
NickRobinson Flag 13 Dec 15 3.48pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Dec 2015 3.33pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Dec 2015 12.20pm

Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

Think this is a very sensible post.

I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition.

For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him.

The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then...

Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron!

No to pointless petitions and legislation...

Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA.

Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
I just wonder how many innocent civilians will have to be killed in the West before our safety starts to become more of an issue that the rights of Muslims in peoples minds and Trump's attitude gains more support. It would be a great tragedy if more terrorism created an atmosphere of anti Muslim sentiment but in the final analysis the majority of people will put their personal safety and that of their loved ones first.


... Probably explains France's switch to vote for right-wing candidates in the most recent elections?

It is happening in Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary and Poland too. People are waking up to the disastrous policies that the lib/left has inflicted on them - uncontrolled immigration, tolerance of Islamic extremism, the lunacy of the Euro and the EU in general. The Islamic bit is ironic really as the liberals are being punished for their support of the least liberal of ideologies, Islam.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 13 Dec 15 4.21pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

.....................................................

How could anyone but a ludicrous bleeding heart liberal think it was that bad? And we all know it was their stupid ideas that got us in this mess,anyway.


I mean, what's wrong with,for example,as Trump has,calling for any and all of your own citizens who are muslims who happen to be abroad to be banned from coming back?

Lets apply it to the UK.I know, lets ban the overseas-based musician Richard Thompson from returning.After all,he's a muslim and we all know what they're all like.

Also,lets not forget the various muslims working for the Met and other police forces.Keep them out if they need to go abroad to an anti-terrorism conference.

Lets ban rising Tory MP Sajid Javid or one of the other 15 muslim MPsfrom returning if he goes to an international meeting.Don't leave Syed Kamall, Tory MEP for London out...

Not forgetting TV journalists/presenters like Lisa Aziz and Faisal Islam

Finally,lets not forget any of the various leading UK muslim boxers and cricketers whenever they go abroad.

Don't leave out muslim footballers playing in the UK: Chamakh. Kurt Zouma,Yaya Sanago,Fellaini,Janujaz,Sagna,Nasri,Ya Ya Toure,Chadli,Guedioura I mean,they're all muslims,so they must all be dodgy and excluded,no?If Kuqi ever tries to pay a visit,don't let him in.He's "one of them" too.

Finally,lets not forget what secret agent Trump's real achievement is and will be:to contribute to the very thing the salafist jihadists want most:to drive all muslims into their camp by hoping our reaction to terrorism will be to create a wedge between muslims generally and others.Anjem Choudary no doubt loves Dear Old Donald for that very reason.

Trump's idiocy that bad? No,its not that bad,I agree...its a lot lot more bad (and plain dumb) than that...

Edited by legaleagle (13 Dec 2015 4.21pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 13 Dec 15 4.35pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Turns out that Trump's dad was a KKKlansman and arrested for having a barney aided by 1,000 other violent pillow headed w@nkers with NYPD back in the day.

Chip off the old block is our Donald it appears.

Edited by Kermit8 (13 Dec 2015 4.35pm)

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 13 Dec 15 6.17pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Dec 2015 4.21pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

.....................................................

How could anyone but a ludicrous bleeding heart liberal think it was that bad? And we all know it was their stupid ideas that got us in this mess,anyway.


I mean, what's wrong with,for example,as Trump has,calling for any and all of your own citizens who are muslims who happen to be abroad to be banned from coming back?

Lets apply it to the UK.I know, lets ban the overseas-based musician Richard Thompson from returning.After all,he's a muslim and we all know what they're all like.

Also,lets not forget the various muslims working for the Met and other police forces.Keep them out if they need to go abroad to an anti-terrorism conference.

Lets ban rising Tory MP Sajid Javid or one of the other 15 muslim MPsfrom returning if he goes to an international meeting.Don't leave Syed Kamall, Tory MEP for London out...

Not forgetting TV journalists/presenters like Lisa Aziz and Faisal Islam

Finally,lets not forget any of the various leading UK muslim boxers and cricketers whenever they go abroad.

Don't leave out muslim footballers playing in the UK: Chamakh. Kurt Zouma,Yaya Sanago,Fellaini,Janujaz,Sagna,Nasri,Ya Ya Toure,Chadli,Guedioura I mean,they're all muslims,so they must all be dodgy and excluded,no?If Kuqi ever tries to pay a visit,don't let him in.He's "one of them" too.

Finally,lets not forget what secret agent Trump's real achievement is and will be:to contribute to the very thing the salafist jihadists want most:to drive all muslims into their camp by hoping our reaction to terrorism will be to create a wedge between muslims generally and others.Anjem Choudary no doubt loves Dear Old Donald for that very reason.

Trump's idiocy that bad? No,its not that bad,I agree...its a lot lot more bad (and plain dumb) than that...

Edited by legaleagle (13 Dec 2015 4.21pm)


I agree but what if Trump had said "Wahhabists"?

I feel that as that even on here where people argue about Islam, they argue from a point of view of ignorance.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 13 Dec 15 8.27pm

Blanket ban on adherents to the wahabbi strain of Islam per se,including US/UK citizens? No.Same silliness road as what Trump actually said.

And,yes ,you are right,there can be degrees of ignorance (including my own) and I appreciate "salafist jihadis" may not be a correct term either to others or objectively,though its mine in describing the ideology espoused (as I understand it) by those presently carrying out wanton terrorist acts.

Edited by legaleagle (13 Dec 2015 8.27pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 13 Dec 15 8.38pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote NickRobinson at 13 Dec 2015 3.48pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Dec 2015 3.33pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Dec 2015 12.20pm

Quote snytaxx at 13 Dec 2015 6.36am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 12 Dec 2015 12.34pm

Was Trump's outburst really that bad?

At first I thought what an idiot, he's stirring up trouble, but I am thinking now he is quite restrained in what he suggests.

We've seen plenty of "hate preachers" on the news and the internet.... Jihadi John beheading innocent victims live on the internet and other Muslim clerics like Abu Hamza and Anjem Choudary preaching hate from London Mosques. ISIS (Da'esh or whatever) recruitment videos on the internet encouraging young muslims to go and fight in Syria.

Trump could have responded with a call to arms and reprisals against these latest outrages, but all he has done is to suggest no immigration to USA for Muslims whilst the situation remains. Not much unlike the ban on Liberians travelling abroad whilst the ebola virus was rampaging out of control.

Trump is an outspoken objectionable human being in many ways and not popular.... but he has the right to freedom of speech and his "outburst" was not any where near as inciteful as the odious characters I've listed above.

What he is suggesting would be pretty much unworkable anyway, so just ignore it.... the answer lies elsewhere.

Think this is a very sensible post.

I really don't have much time for Trump, but I refused to sign the petition to keep him out of the UK not because I disagree with it, I just think its a totally pointless petition.

For starters he doesn't have any plans to actually visit the UK any time soon meaning the whole question is hypothetical. Banning him would be like if a neighbour from a nearby street rung up telling you that you are 'not welcome' to go to his garden party next weekend (despite never having been invited to begin with) because he is upset by something you said to some people in your own house that he disagrees with despite the message not being directed at him.

The other problem is what if we did ban him and he gets elected? We would find ourselves with all sorts of legal headaches then...

Yes to condemning Trump for being a moron!

No to pointless petitions and legislation...

Trump is electioneering first and foremost but taking his comments on face value, I think he is saying what a lot of people privately think. It has all been said before, but no one, including him I'm sure,believe that all Muslims are responsible for terrorism. It is only that those responsible for recent terrorism are all Muslims. If protection of citizens is the primary objective then a total ban on Muslims entering the country is an option. Now clearly, Muslims aren't going to agree and nor are some sections of the political spectrum for idealogical reasons but that is no reason to start banning anyone especially a potential, albeit unlikely president of the USA.

Identity politics is at work here of course with most politicians queuing up to be more outraged than another over Trump's comments but surely we can all see through that cynical nonsense.
I just wonder how many innocent civilians will have to be killed in the West before our safety starts to become more of an issue that the rights of Muslims in peoples minds and Trump's attitude gains more support. It would be a great tragedy if more terrorism created an atmosphere of anti Muslim sentiment but in the final analysis the majority of people will put their personal safety and that of their loved ones first.


... Probably explains France's switch to vote for right-wing candidates in the most recent elections?

It is happening in Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary and Poland too. People are waking up to the disastrous policies that the lib/left has inflicted on them - uncontrolled immigration, tolerance of Islamic extremism, the lunacy of the Euro and the EU in general. The Islamic bit is ironic really as the liberals are being punished for their support of the least liberal of ideologies, Islam.


French far right routed [Link]

Maybe next time. Here's to you, Mr Robinson

Edited by Kermit8 (13 Dec 2015 8.40pm)

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 9 of 13 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Donald Trump