You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!
November 26 2024 4.19am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 13 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

  

eagleboi Flag Catford 18 Apr 14 1.36pm Send a Private Message to eagleboi Add eagleboi as a friend

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.12pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am


Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,


Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.



Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

Mate, you've been watching too much Law and Order


Lololol. Think my ears prick up every time I hear sexual words like perverting, sapina etc. haha.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 18 Apr 14 1.37pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.34pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 1.28pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am


Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,


Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.



Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.


No, because there are currently no ongoing proceedings (either criminal or civil) or police investigations to be 'perverted'. Some of us are getting a tad carried away

Maybe so, but who is to say things are happening in private? Police investigations into the phone's texts? All I know is that if I were in the same situation I would like to think that I would be honest than jeopardise my job and thus bringing home the bacon for me Family.

Fcuk trying to be labelled as bitter. Family first. You're more of a Man in my eyes if that is done imo.


Police investigations

If this were the case Cardiff would have leaked it by now.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 2.03pm Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am


Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,


Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.



Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

Withholding info ? This isn't some criminal act.

He had no obligation to do anything at the point he got the text.

If he was asked by the PL at a later date then he could divulge whatever he felt he had too.

Trying to say he HAD to pass the message on is just stupid. If he felt he HAD to then he should have contacted the PL straight away.

It was an act of pure spite not principle.


As for the adultery part well .....

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.06pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 18 Apr 14 2.08pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Whether this rumour is true or not, isn't important to the following:

Not at all surprised there's a few Nigel Nigella fruits on here defending 'one of their own', grassing up, snitching, being a bitter little snide towards their own, even them. This is the biggest facepalm moment for all Nigels this year. Completely embarrassing yet most of them wouldn't say boo to Alan Carr if it came to it.

 

COYP
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 18 Apr 14 2.10pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

adrianb, go and watch Miss Marple. You deserve it.

 

COYP
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 2.16pm Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote Rudi Hedman at 18 Apr 2014 2.10pm

adrianb, go and watch Miss Marple. You deserve it.


and take Eagleboi with you ....... you've both gone mad.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleboi Flag Catford 18 Apr 14 2.22pm Send a Private Message to eagleboi Add eagleboi as a friend

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.16pm

Quote Rudi Hedman at 18 Apr 2014 2.10pm

adrianb, go and watch Miss Marple. You deserve it.


and take Eagleboi with you ....... you've both gone mad.


Yep, mad indeed. That's the only logical answer.

Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 4.28pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleboi Flag Catford 18 Apr 14 2.23pm Send a Private Message to eagleboi Add eagleboi as a friend

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.03pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am


Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,


Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.



Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

Withholding info ? This isn't some criminal act.

He had no obligation to do anything at the point he got the text.

If he was asked by the PL at a later date then he could divulge whatever he felt he had too.

Trying to say he HAD to pass the message on is just stupid. If he felt he HAD to then he should have contacted the PL straight away.

It was an act of pure spite not principle.


As for the adultery part well .....

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.06pm)

What's stupid is trying to decipher whether he HAD to morally or legally. Either way, am not going to denigrate a man for doing so.

Really peeved me off when Gary Neville said Matt Jarvis should've gone down to against Arsenal. Some decisions will be missed but sportsmanship in the game is going completely in this beautiful game. The game is losing its morals and sportsmanship at too fast a rate :/

[Link]

Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 2.41pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 2.39pm Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 2.23pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.03pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.06pm)

What's stupid is trying to decipher whether he HAD to morally or legally. Either way, am not going to denigrate a man for doing so.

Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 2.26pm)


Don't change tac. No need to decipher anything.
You've been plainly stating that he had a LEGAL responsibility to do so - he quite obviously didn't.

He did it because he is a disloyal and ungrateful t*** - and now all but a few blind fools can see that quite clearly .


Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.40pm)

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.41pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleboi Flag Catford 18 Apr 14 2.45pm Send a Private Message to eagleboi Add eagleboi as a friend

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.39pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 2.23pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.03pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.06pm)

What's stupid is trying to decipher whether he HAD to morally or legally. Either way, am not going to denigrate a man for doing so.

Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 2.26pm)


Don't change tac. No need to decipher anything.
You've been plainly stating that he had a LEGAL responsibility to do so - he quite obviously didn't.

He did it because he is a disloyal and ungrateful t*** - and now all but a few blind fools can see that quite clearly .


Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.40pm)

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.41pm)

Not changing tac at all Squire. Quite clearly said if there were any LAWYERS amongst the HOLers who could enlighten, but thanks for seeing things clearly for us without all the facts.

The only situation here is the blind leading the blind. Disclosing info to ensure you're on the right side of the law is NOTHING to do with disloyalty or ungratefulness. This country needs to stand up for what is right than label or put down a person for doing the right thing morally or legally.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 2.52pm Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 2.45pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.39pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 2.23pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.03pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.06pm)

What's stupid is trying to decipher whether he HAD to morally or legally. Either way, am not going to denigrate a man for doing so.

Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 2.26pm)


Don't change tac. No need to decipher anything.
You've been plainly stating that he had a LEGAL responsibility to do so - he quite obviously didn't.

He did it because he is a disloyal and ungrateful t*** - and now all but a few blind fools can see that quite clearly .


Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.40pm)

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.41pm)

Not changing tac at all Squire. Quite clearly said if there were any LAWYERS amongst the HOLers who could enlighten, but thanks for seeing things clearly for us without all the facts.

The only situation here is the blind leading the blind. Disclosing info to ensure you're on the right side of the law is NOTHING to do with disloyalty or ungratefulness. This country needs to stand up for what is right than label or put down a person for doing the right thing morally or legally.

Can't you see that if he was trying to do the supposed"right thing" morally or legally he would have contacted the authorities not the bloody opposition ???

That's my last post on this.

It is sad when your heroes let you down (and you obviously can't face facts)- he was one of my favourite all time players - but now I can see he's just a nasty little selfish man.

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.54pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleboi Flag Catford 18 Apr 14 3.05pm Send a Private Message to eagleboi Add eagleboi as a friend

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.52pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 2.45pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.39pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 2.23pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 2.03pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.06pm)

What's stupid is trying to decipher whether he HAD to morally or legally. Either way, am not going to denigrate a man for doing so.

Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 2.26pm)


Don't change tac. No need to decipher anything.
You've been plainly stating that he had a LEGAL responsibility to do so - he quite obviously didn't.

He did it because he is a disloyal and ungrateful t*** - and now all but a few blind fools can see that quite clearly .


Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.40pm)

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.41pm)

Not changing tac at all Squire. Quite clearly said if there were any LAWYERS amongst the HOLers who could enlighten, but thanks for seeing things clearly for us without all the facts.

The only situation here is the blind leading the blind. Disclosing info to ensure you're on the right side of the law is NOTHING to do with disloyalty or ungratefulness. This country needs to stand up for what is right than label or put down a person for doing the right thing morally or legally.

Can't you see that if he was trying to do the supposed"right thing" morally or legally he would have contacted the authorities not the bloody opposition ???

That's my last post on this.

It is sad when your heroes let you down (and you obviously can't face facts)- he was one of my favourite all time players - but now I can see he's just a nasty little selfish man.

Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 2.54pm)

True. I see where you're coming from. I ain't no angel either. It does hurt when one of your heroes does something against ya. But also doing nothing at all could be classed as immoral n' all...For evil to prevail, it only takes good people to do nothing, or words to that effect...Hard to call.


Edited by eagleboi (18 Apr 2014 3.07pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 9 of 13 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!