There's nothing wise about accepting this treatment before it has finished its development trials. That's going to be in January 2023.
The emergency clause in the Coronavirus act 2020 that allows jabs to be carried out beforehand is the only reason they are already being rolled out.
Because all medical professionals have signed the oath, if you ask anyone of them "Is it safe?" they'll have to answer truthfully. And the truth is they don't know. Nobody does.
So anyone who's already had it, have taken part in a trial.
Anyone who hasn't yet should consider these two questions
1) Does it contain MRC-5 (aborted foetal tissue) ?
2)Is there a possibility of a latrogenic reaction? This is when multiple compounds contained in the "vaccine" react with each other. When inside human beings this has the potential to cause harm.
The answer to 1) is yes, it does.
And the answer to 2) is yes, there is.

There's nothing wise about accepting this treatment before it has finished its development trials. That's going to be in January 2023.
The emergency clause in the Coronavirus act 2020 that allows jabs to be carried out beforehand is the only reason they are already being rolled out.
Because all medical professionals have signed the oath, if you ask anyone of them "Is it safe?" they'll have to answer truthfully. And the truth is they don't know. Nobody does.
So anyone who's already had it, have taken part in a trial.
Anyone who hasn't yet should consider these two questions
1) Does it contain MRC-5 (aborted foetal tissue) ?
2)Is there a possibility of a latrogenic reaction? This is when multiple compounds contained in the "vaccine" react with each other. When inside human beings this has the potential to cause harm.
The answer to 1) is yes, it does.
And the answer to 2) is yes, there is.

There's nothing wise about accepting this treatment before it has finished its development trials. That's going to be in January 2023.
The emergency clause in the Coronavirus act 2020 that allows jabs to be carried out beforehand is the only reason they are already being rolled out.
Because all medical professionals have signed the oath, if you ask anyone of them "Is it safe?" they'll have to answer truthfully. And the truth is they don't know. Nobody does.
So anyone who's already had it, have taken part in a trial.
Anyone who hasn't yet should consider these two questions
1) Does it contain MRC-5 (aborted foetal tissue) ?
2)Is there a possibility of a latrogenic reaction? This is when multiple compounds contained in the "vaccine" react with each other. When inside human beings this has the potential to cause harm.
The answer to 1) is yes, it does.
And the answer to 2) is yes, there is.

I am not reassured, Wisbech.
Fact-checkers exist for one reason only ; to suppress the truth.
I have never been a Face-Booker either.

I think you'll find that there are an alarming number of people who have found that a side effect of Covid is death itself.

I've always liked a gamble so I know which one I'll be backing.

To be honest, mezzer , I haven't checked the figures recently, but throughout the pandemic those that failed to recover from covid were consistently much less than 1 % of all who tested positive regardless of age. Witty himself only recently reaffirmed that the majority of cases will only suffer mild flu symptoms.
Go ahead and gamble, it's your choice. But there's more here than just money you may lose.