Just because you want him to stay that doesn't count as a majority.

I'd say he's on a seesaw, the balance was in his favour last week, less so this week. He'll be gone by Crimbo, we're not going to improve under him. This is the start of the slide.

Conjunctivitis.com - A site for sore eyes.

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Manager Vote' by Midlands Eagle

This should be pinned

We have to gamble because we cannot afford the likes of Hazard, Aguero, Son, Van Dijk and Sterling, If we sell Zaha we will no doubt be able to buy some players to replace him, the money will reduce the gamble somewhat but it will still be a gamble sadly.

Take one or two players out of the top six teams and watch them suffer on the pitch, I hate all this rubbish about Zaha, just look at how crap Chelsea are without Hazard!

I’m fortunate to have seen the away wins at Manchester City, Newcastle and Arsenal this season , a feat I doubt we’ll see again for many years in one season.
However, I have also seen really poor performances at home this season epitomised by today.
Sloppy passing, lack of creativity going forward and essentially nine men behind the ball with only Wilf and Benteke forward.
There’s no point playing Benteke if we don’t play players close to him or hit crosses to take advantage of his aerial ability.
With Zaha off form as well we had zero threat and I can’t remember Pickford making a save.
I’m ok with Roy staying but I’d like to see it written into his contract that he can’t play 9 men behind the ball at home unless it’s against the top 4!