This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
cryrst The garden of England 28 Feb 21 9.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
'These are the rules'. Listen to yourself Cryrst. You have accepted the premise that the government get to tell you how to live your life and you insult those who don't agree. Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Feb 2021 9.18am) Not true Stirling. I insult those who break the rules, not those who disagree. Do I insult you or eaglecoops or any poster who doesn't agree?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 28 Feb 21 10.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Not true Stirling. I insult those who break the rules, not those who disagree. Do I insult you or eaglecoops or any poster who doesn't agree? I would imagine if someone breaks the 'rules' then it's because they don't agree with them. No, you haven't insulted us and I thank you for it. This difference is purely contained upon this one topic area my man and there is much we agree on.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 28 Feb 21 10.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I would imagine if someone breaks the 'rules' then it's because they don't agree with them. No, you haven't insulted us and I thank you for it. This difference is purely contained upon this one topic area my man and there is much we agree on. Which makes for healthy debate, myself and wissie even agree on this subject. The wonders of opinions eh!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 28 Feb 21 10.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Which makes for healthy debate, myself and wissie even agree on this subject. The wonders of opinions eh! Quite so Cryrst. I must admit, I don't think that's happened for many of us. But I respect that this topic doesn't really fit right or left that easily. It's more a state/individual or authoritarian/libertarian thing. I might have issues with the effectiveness of libertarianism (it's been pretty useless like conservatism generally) but I've always respected its principles.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 28 Feb 21 10.58am | |
---|---|
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 28 Feb 21 11.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Foxy82
Why are so many people losing their sh*t over a few crowds in parks. Did they not see the articles published recently dispelling the myths surrounding the 'super spreader' beaches from last summer? Surely this is the same thing? Here's a quote from the article if you don't have the time to read it: “We have known for some time that only about 10% of transmission events are linked to outdoor activities,” said Dr Müge Çevik, a lecturer in infectious diseases and medical virology at the University of St Andrews. I forgot to mention the beach myth. And that article is from the Guardian, where probably all readers are lockdown enthusiasts.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 28 Feb 21 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Had a look in the TV guide yesterday to see if there’s anything on terrestrial tv I’ve missed or good being shown. All I found was a 4th series of ‘Unforgotten’ on itv. I’ve seen the first 3 on Netflix and it’s very good. And Horizons on bbc on ‘What we now know’, and Dispatches on CH4 on ‘Who’s going to pay’ On Horizons they presented what I’ve thought for a long time now. That the early symptomatic spread is the problem, as are super spreader events (no, not outside), rather than brief encounters with people. On Dispatches they barely mentioned printing money or QE quantitative easing it was called from 2008. The then Labour chancellor Alistair Darling even said it is not something that should be considered a regular strategy. Just a one off in certain times. Mostly the programme talked about jobs, fiscal policy, including investing in high unemployment areas in the north, and when and when not to tax coming out of this crisis. Is MMT even in the press and will we even hear about it? The budget is this week and we’re 5 minutes into the Fulham match so hopefully I’m not bored off the match.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 28 Feb 21 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
On Horizons they presented what I’ve thought for a long time now. That the early symptomatic spread is the problem, as are super spreader events (no, not outside), rather than brief encounters with people. That sounds about right. Around two days prior to showing symptoms people are especially likely to spread it. Likely right on the other point too, there are situations where they believe individual people may spread it to an almost improbable amount of people. From what I've read super spreaders are more likely to be old and-or overweight (thought to them possibly breathing more forcefully). At least these groups are both targets of vaccination so that's something.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 28 Feb 21 3.41pm | |
---|---|
It was actually worth watching. The previous Horizons at the start of the crisis looked more and more speculative as time went on. One of those doctor brothers advising to drink hot drinks to wash Covid down for example. This time they have data and an interesting mathematical formula near the end.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 28 Feb 21 4.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
It was actually worth watching. The previous Horizons at the start of the crisis looked more and more speculative as time went on. One of those doctor brothers advising to drink hot drinks to wash Covid down for example. This time they have data and an interesting mathematical formula near the end. I'll be sure to watch it on catch up. Thanks for the heads-up!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 28 Feb 21 4.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Enraging. I just don’t understand the thought process, regardless of age. Young people aren’t the only ones doing exactly the same thing Moronic beyond belief
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 01 Mar 21 10.57am | |
---|---|
So large corporate firms are starting to make noises about an en masse phased return to in office working from the beginning of April. I do wonder what is going to happen to people who for some reason have gone along with the romantic ideal of 'we'll never have to work in an office again' and either sold themselves into that ideal completely or actually sold their flats or houses and moved 3 hours away thinking this scenario would be permanent. I was baffled at the time with all this moving out for home working nonsense, plus all the sycophantic dross about 'it's here to stay'. No, no it's not. What is here to stay is more flexibility than ever before over home working, not permanent home working, and that won't apply across every sector. What this has taught me is that for most industries all staff working from home for the majority of the time is actually not as efficient, culturally beneficial or in most cases as professional as it is made out to be. I would assume prices will switch back somewhat – inner city up, outer city down. It was always going to be a temporary situation... anyone that thought otherwise, well, I'd love to hear their reasoning as to why they thought it would be permanent.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.