You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
January 15 2025 5.52am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 835 of 2586 < 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 >

Topic Locked

CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 23 Oct 17 6.34pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

Here is another: Research by the AA found that despite traffic volumes falling within the zone, speeds became slower over the decade, as a result of road space being turned into bus lanes, cycle and pedestrian safety measures, and roadworks.

It said that roads were now so clogged, emissions of PM10 soot particles from car tyres and brakes were greater than from exhausts because of the amount of starting and stopping.

But it had raised a few billion in revenue, most of which was pissed away on the administration of it.

AA certainly don't have an agenda do they?

Clearly the answer is to ban cars from central London altogether (I'm in favour).

The data shows there are fewer cars since the CC was brought in. All revenue is spent either on admin of the system or put into public transport. This is a good thing. The T-charge is predicted by the Mayor not to make any money in excess of the costs of admin but the change in behaviour is worth it as it will improve the air quality in central London. When the Low Emission zone is pushed out to the N&S Circulars this will be a good thing.

The issue is there is not enough space to cope with all the traffic in central London and the big issue has been the addition of considerable numbers of delivery vehicles. This is a relatively new trend and one that needs addressing. Indeed many new developments as part of planning restrictions aren't allowed mail rooms on site and must have dedicated delivery hubs outside central London to try and tackle this issue.

It's clearly a problem and anything to help it should be welcome but we need to go further.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 23 Oct 17 6.39pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

It's not achievable, we'll have to disagree.

I'm not doing more (i.e. paying more) while the rest of the planet are wilfully f***ing it up far more than I am. Once the government are zero polluting they can ask the rest of us to follow suit, should the far bigger emitting countries sort their acts out too. Until then, it's a revenue raising task and nothing more.

That's a ridiculous attitude. The point is the government set the law and set and example and create incentives for people. You're demonstrating the lack of incentives, but cutting of your nose to spite your face seems foolish. You should be concerned about this and keen to see progress made so your kids and their kids don't end up seeing their life expectancy fall (already happening by the way) and their health suffer.

Calling it a revenue raising task and nothing more is ignorant of the whole idea and the outcomes and direction of travel.

There is seriously no point in Brexit if this is the attitude. We need to have the desire to be world leaders in this kind of area for this to be a success. We need to be more efficient, greener and more equal a society. This government is making a hash of it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
elgrande Flag bedford 23 Oct 17 6.41pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

AA certainly don't have an agenda do they?

Clearly the answer is to ban cars from central London altogether (I'm in favour).

The data shows there are fewer cars since the CC was brought in. All revenue is spent either on admin of the system or put into public transport. This is a good thing. The T-charge is predicted by the Mayor not to make any money in excess of the costs of admin but the change in behaviour is worth it as it will improve the air quality in central London. When the Low Emission zone is pushed out to the N&S Circulars this will be a good thing.

The issue is there is not enough space to cope with all the traffic in central London and the big issue has been the addition of considerable numbers of delivery vehicles. This is a relatively new trend and one that needs addressing. Indeed many new developments as part of planning restrictions aren't allowed mail rooms on site and must have dedicated delivery hubs outside central London to try and tackle this issue.

It's clearly a problem and anything to help it should be welcome but we need to go further.

Do you use shops,supermarkets,have parcels delivered.
I deliver in my lorry into london on a Friday (before that 30 cab driver).
Things need to be delivered people need to go from a to b.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 23 Oct 17 6.44pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

It is. Why isn't it based on real world emissions? A euro 6 engine can easily pollute more than a euro 3 or 4 engine depending on the car, fuel etc.

Euro ratings do set limits on exhaust emissions for Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons, Nitrogen oxide and Particulate matter in grams per km.

How else do you suggest it's done? By stopping and testing each car by the side of the road as it enters the CC zone?

"According to figures from the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT), the Euro emissions have had a significant influence in reducing emissions."

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 23 Oct 17 6.50pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

Do you use shops,supermarkets,have parcels delivered.
I deliver in my lorry into london on a Friday (before that 30 cab driver).
Things need to be delivered people need to go from a to b.

Soon enough private cars and most delivery vehicles will be all but banned from central London.

The way planning is going offices will have to have a delivery centre outside the centre of London and then a single delivery will be made once a day at most. This has happened with 22 Bishopsgate already.

People can get from a to b via public transport or on foot or bike. Cars won't be around for too much longer.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
elgrande Flag bedford 23 Oct 17 7.14pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

Soon enough private cars and most delivery vehicles will be all but banned from central London.

The way planning is going offices will have to have a delivery centre outside the centre of London and then a single delivery will be made once a day at most. This has happened with 22 Bishopsgate already.

People can get from a to b via public transport or on foot or bike. Cars won't be around for too much longer.

Shops and supermarkets sometimes have more tban one delivery a day.
You will always have to have deliveries,consumets buy the products,shelfs need re filling.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 23 Oct 17 7.36pm

Originally posted by elgrande

Shops and supermarkets sometimes have more tban one delivery a day.
You will always have to have deliveries,consumets buy the products,shelfs need re filling.

Drones ...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 23 Oct 17 8.11pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Drones ...

What, legaleagle going into the delivery business?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
elgrande Flag bedford 23 Oct 17 9.07pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Drones ...

Yeah nice one, an artic load of deliveries dropped from a drone.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
tome Flag Inner Tantalus Time. 23 Oct 17 9.15pm Send a Private Message to tome Add tome as a friend

Won't future electric cars (and presumably trucks) address the emissions issue?

 


A one and a two...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 23 Oct 17 9.25pm

Originally posted by tome

Won't future electric cars (and presumably trucks) address the emissions issue?

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 23 Oct 17 9.32pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by tome

Won't future electric cars (and presumably trucks) address the emissions issue?

Hydrogen fuel cells are the way forward according to the Toyota UK Chairman, as electric cars have huge carbon footprint needing power stations galore.

I saw a Dutch solar powered car at the weekend a prototype so the boundaries are being pushed all the time.

Who knows in 2040 electric cars may well be obsolete.

How the earth was created I don't know but everything was provided, the sun the wind, foolish mankind just goes on its destructive path.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 835 of 2586 < 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic