You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn
November 24 2024 3.50pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Jeremy Corbyn

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 82 of 464 < 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 >

  

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Sep 15 4.24pm

Quote chris123 at 22 Sep 2015 4.20pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 3.42pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Sep 2015 2.55pm

The to

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 2.44pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

Well I wouldn't compensate shareholders in an ideal world, which were talking about here.


The trouble with that angle is that you'd be guilty of theft. And worse still, be working on the same logic as the stupid bitch in charge of Argentina.

Edited by Stuk (22 Sep 2015 2.55pm)

Well yes, although technically only guilty if it wasn't achieved through a legally defined process - Presumably if I've won an election I have a democratic mandate to pursue the statements of my manifesto.

I'm not sure if people have noticed, my politics are very leftwing.


Absolutely not, as Greece has demonstrated. Promising the undeliverable does not make it possible, nor is it democratic.

true. I never really said it was in any way a real possibility, only something I believe in; the idea of a public transport system that's free at point of use, or very cheap (subsidized), and why I believe that (I don't believe people should have to pay to actually go to work).


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
npn Flag Crowborough 22 Sep 15 4.30pm Send a Private Message to npn Add npn as a friend

Supposing for a moment it were even possible, or sane (it isn't either), how do you think all these people who can now leave the car at home and travel by this wonderful free travel network actually going to fit on?

Most services in to London are full and standing before they get within half an hour of the city. So not only do we take on the expense of the network as is, we also presumably need to fund incredible levels of investment into infrastructure, stations, rolling stock, etc.

Bibble!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 22 Sep 15 4.32pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 4.12pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Sep 2015 4.07pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 3.42pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Sep 2015 2.55pm

The to

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 2.44pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

Well I wouldn't compensate shareholders in an ideal world, which were talking about here.


The trouble with that angle is that you'd be guilty of theft. And worse still, be working on the same logic as the stupid bitch in charge of Argentina.

Edited by Stuk (22 Sep 2015 2.55pm)

Well yes, although technically only guilty if it wasn't achieved through a legally defined process - Presumably if I've won an election I have a democratic mandate to pursue the statements of my manifesto.

I'm not sure if people have noticed, my politics are very leftwing.


Crazy Argie bitch thought the same, she was wrong.

I would though, right up her General Belgrano.


Her skin appears to be falling off her face nowadays.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 22 Sep 15 4.33pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote npn at 22 Sep 2015 4.30pm

Supposing for a moment it were even possible, or sane (it isn't either), how do you think all these people who can now leave the car at home and travel by this wonderful free travel network actually going to fit on?

Most services in to London are full and standing before they get within half an hour of the city. So not only do we take on the expense of the network as is, we also presumably need to fund incredible levels of investment into infrastructure, stations, rolling stock, etc.

Bibble!


Walk.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Part Time James Flag 22 Sep 15 4.35pm Send a Private Message to Part Time James Add Part Time James as a friend

Quote npn at 22 Sep 2015 4.30pm

Supposing for a moment it were even possible, or sane (it isn't either), how do you think all these people who can now leave the car at home and travel by this wonderful free travel network actually going to fit on?

Most services in to London are full and standing before they get within half an hour of the city. So not only do we take on the expense of the network as is, we also presumably need to fund incredible levels of investment into infrastructure, stations, rolling stock, etc.

Bibble!


Because they'd be able to replace all the roads with more rails and then they could lay on extra trains.

This would also generate extra work for train drivers, ticket collectors and people who polish the railway lines.

The only downside would be people that do MOTs or vacuum cars would have to develop a different skill set to remain employable.

Swings and roundabouts.

 




Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 22 Sep 15 4.46pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 3.55pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Sep 2015 3.49pm

Quote chris123 at 22 Sep 2015 3.42pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?


I would imagine more likely is the privitisation of Network Rail.

Just renationalise line by line as the contracts and tenders (no pun intended railway buffs) expire.


That is contrary to EU law. Nationalised companies cannot participate in transport/rail tenders. Whats the way around this? Leave the EU?

Not at all. The French state already run a large number of services in the UK. Until recently the East Coast mainline was state owned but the Tories couldn't bear to allow it to succeed. It was returning more money to the treasury than its privitized competitors - so the people who own the Tory party made sure it was killed off.

It is simply a case of letting the existing franchises run down

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 22 Sep 15 4.47pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

What is your source for the £70m?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 22 Sep 15 5.38pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Sedlescombe at 22 Sep 2015 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 3.55pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Sep 2015 3.49pm

Quote chris123 at 22 Sep 2015 3.42pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?


I would imagine more likely is the privitisation of Network Rail.

Just renationalise line by line as the contracts and tenders (no pun intended railway buffs) expire.


That is contrary to EU law. Nationalised companies cannot participate in transport/rail tenders. Whats the way around this? Leave the EU?

Not at all. The French state already run a large number of services in the UK. Until recently the East Coast mainline was state owned but the Tories couldn't bear to allow it to succeed. It was returning more money to the treasury than its privitized competitors - so the people who own the Tory party made sure it was killed off.

It is simply a case of letting the existing franchises run down

[Link]

Wrong!

[Link]


 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 22 Sep 15 5.40pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Sedlescombe at 22 Sep 2015 4.47pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

What is your source for the £70m?


I said 70 billion not million.

Network Rails debts are 34 billion. Matter of public record.

In 2004 then Chanceelor said that to renationalise rail it would cost 22 billion. Conservatively, add 20% for increase in asset base plus legal and admin fees and you come to 70 billion.

Has that answered your question?

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 22 Sep 15 5.44pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 5.40pm

Quote Sedlescombe at 22 Sep 2015 4.47pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

What is your source for the £70m?


I said 70 billion not million.

Network Rails debts are 34 billion. Matter of public record.

In 2004 then Chanceelor said that to renationalise rail it would cost 22 billion. Conservatively, add 20% for increase in asset base plus legal and admin fees and you come to 70 billion.

Has that answered your question?


If someone else posted something like that you would slaughter them Matthew

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 22 Sep 15 5.45pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 5.40pm

Quote Sedlescombe at 22 Sep 2015 4.47pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

What is your source for the £70m?


I said 70 billion not million.

Network Rails debts are 34 billion. Matter of public record.

In 2004 then Chanceelor said that to renationalise rail it would cost 22 billion. Conservatively, add 20% for increase in asset base plus legal and admin fees and you come to 70 billion.

Has that answered your question?


Network Rail is already state owned.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 22 Sep 15 5.50pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote chris123 at 22 Sep 2015 5.45pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 5.40pm

Quote Sedlescombe at 22 Sep 2015 4.47pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Sep 2015 2.19pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Sep 2015 1.34pm

I'd like to see public transport free at point of use, with a focus on reducing the demand for private automobile use etc, and recouping costs through taxation.


Cost for renationalising alone would be GBP 70 billion. In order to meet demand, improvements in track and rolling stock would be an additional tens of billions, if not more.

How much would your proposal cost? How much extra would people have to pay in tax in order for this to happen? How would you get people out of their cars and on to public transport?

What is your source for the £70m?


I said 70 billion not million.

Network Rails debts are 34 billion. Matter of public record.

In 2004 then Chanceelor said that to renationalise rail it would cost 22 billion. Conservatively, add 20% for increase in asset base plus legal and admin fees and you come to 70 billion.

Has that answered your question?


Network Rail is already state owned.


True and I did t explain what I meant properly. The total liabilities the tax payer would have on their books from a fully privatised rail network would include the Network Rail liabilities.

However, it looks like Network Rail could be privatised before the next election.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 82 of 464 < 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn