This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 21 11.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Moronus Maximus. "Two women have described how they were “treated like criminals” after being surrounded by police and fined £200 each for apparently breaching lockdown rules when they drove five miles to meet for a walk. Jessica Allen and Eliza Moore said they were surrounded by police when they met up at a reservoir near where they live. “We were treated like criminals,” Allen, from Ashby-de-la-Zouch in Leicestershire, said on Instagram. “They read us our rights to say that anything we say may be held in evidence and used in court. We had gone for a walk five miles away from home!” The women told the BBC that they were surrounded by police when they arrived at Foremark Reservoir in South Derbyshire." (yahoo, Jan 2021) If only i were in the police force. A thorough 'internal' lasting many hours would not be good enough for these f-cking idiots. There does need to be more specific guidance on this. This kind of thing also happened in the first lockdown but was clarified by Hancock to say that your "local area" meant within 3 miles of your home. (It might have been 5 miles as this is from memory). The reason was to enable those living in crowded suburban environments to travel to parks and other open spaces to exercise safely and in more conducive places. I live in a village where there are more cyclists and walkers (many with dogs) than cars. Nevertheless to get to somewhere where my own dog can safely be let off his lead and allowed to really stretch his legs is a mile and a half away. This is on public land which was previously mined but is now part woodland, heather banks, old mine terraces and tailing lagoons. It is much quieter than even my quiet village where I will pass people who invariably want to chat. Which is great but also not so wise at the moment. So I am driving to that area every day for my exercise. In the past I have often gone further to the cliff paths and beaches. Much as I would like to I am not doing so now. Our local Police Chief has urged people to behave responsibly, not to travel unnecessarily but to determine what that means in their own circumstances. I agree with the Derbyshire Police that driving any kind of distance to beauty spots isn't acceptable but is what I am doing OK this time? I think it is responsible behaviour. Our local Police are also using number recognition technology to turn back those they find are travelling into the area without sufficient reason. We had a scramble of people from the cities trying to come to their second homes or rent on holiday parks during the first lockdown, which caused quite a big problem here. It's quite understandable that they would try but also quite dangerous.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 09 Jan 21 12.44am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 09 Jan 21 7.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There does need to be more specific guidance on this. This kind of thing also happened in the first lockdown but was clarified by Hancock to say that your "local area" meant within 3 miles of your home. (It might have been 5 miles as this is from memory). The reason was to enable those living in crowded suburban environments to travel to parks and other open spaces to exercise safely and in more conducive places. I live in a village where there are more cyclists and walkers (many with dogs) than cars. Nevertheless to get to somewhere where my own dog can safely be let off his lead and allowed to really stretch his legs is a mile and a half away. This is on public land which was previously mined but is now part woodland, heather banks, old mine terraces and tailing lagoons. It is much quieter than even my quiet village where I will pass people who invariably want to chat. Which is great but also not so wise at the moment. So I am driving to that area every day for my exercise. In the past I have often gone further to the cliff paths and beaches. Much as I would like to I am not doing so now. Our local Police Chief has urged people to behave responsibly, not to travel unnecessarily but to determine what that means in their own circumstances. I agree with the Derbyshire Police that driving any kind of distance to beauty spots isn't acceptable but is what I am doing OK this time? I think it is responsible behaviour. Our local Police are also using number recognition technology to turn back those they find are travelling into the area without sufficient reason. We had a scramble of people from the cities trying to come to their second homes or rent on holiday parks during the first lockdown, which caused quite a big problem here. It's quite understandable that they would try but also quite dangerous. If it fell within what Hancock said is irrelevant really. Tbh why did they need to be at that place. Why not walk around local areas; I mean its walking.....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eden Eagle Kent 09 Jan 21 7.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
If it fell within what Hancock said is irrelevant really. Tbh why did they need to be at that place. Why not walk around local areas; I mean its walking..... How is it more dangerous travelling a few miles by car and then taking a walk compared to walking from home if the same social distance rules are applied?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 09 Jan 21 8.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There does need to be more specific guidance on this. This kind of thing also happened in the first lockdown but was clarified by Hancock to say that your "local area" meant within 3 miles of your home. (It might have been 5 miles as this is from memory). The reason was to enable those living in crowded suburban environments to travel to parks and other open spaces to exercise safely and in more conducive places. I agree with the Derbyshire Police that driving any kind of distance to beauty spots isn't acceptable but is what I am doing OK this time? I think it is responsible behaviour. technology to turn back those they find are travelling into the area without sufficient reason. We had a scramble of people from the cities trying to come to their second homes or rent on holiday parks during the first lockdown, which caused quite a big problem here. It's quite understandable that they would try but also quite dangerous. I felt sorry for those 2 women and the police are now backtracking. I live in leafy Beckenham but I have walked every inch and frankly would love a change of scenery, our parks are also crowded. Okay I have to suck it up but what if you lived in an inner city crime estate. "just going for a walk dear thought I would go via the urine smelling underpass then right where the junkies shoot up straight on dodging the skateboarders and trick cyclists and kids with the electric scooters." "Don't forget to take some cash for the muggers".
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Runningman Keston 09 Jan 21 11.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
All hospital staff should be presented with the vaccine. End the absenteeism shambles. But full vaccine protection takes 3 weeks. I’ve heard even after being vaccinated they’d require staff to isolate if they’ve been in contact with a Covid carrier. Unsurprisingly typical. Some of the beds that have been unnecessarily blanked off shouldn’t be. Beds are never close together anyway. There are some measures they can’t reverse. I’ve heard they have different rooms for positive, negative and results waiting patients. ******
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 09 Jan 21 11.32am | |
---|---|
I see Mayor Khan is virtue signalling again by declaring a "major incident". So what good is that? In the US if a governor does that there is a specific purpose it is a legal move that it triggers the release of funds and even allows for the call up of the National Guard amongst other things. We know we are in a crisis so thank you for pointing that out Mr Mayor oh and buy the way weren't you the one telling transport police to go lightly on people not wearing masks on the tube etc. So what powers do you have to act? Are you offering to help the NHS, ambulance staff err no but you do want more money from the government. Please god we have the mayoral elections this year.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 09 Jan 21 1.15pm | |
---|---|
Interesting article on Bloomberg today about mRNA based vaccines - essentially the mRNA process can be used to target and treat cancer in a non collateral fashion. Along with vaccines for a whole host of other diseases, expect them to become commonplace over the next 10 years. The early cancer research appears potentially game changing
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Uphill Bedford 09 Jan 21 1.35pm | |
---|---|
I was 'over the moon' to receive the Pfizer jab in December. But my 2nd jab on Jan 4th was cancelled as the government wanted to give more people a first dose. My 2nd jab will not be now until March. On the face of it a sensible decision UNTIL I discovered that Pfizer have not trialled a 12 week gap between doses and both the WHO and FDA have stated that the 2nd dose should not be given later than 6 weeks. It is possible I have become an uninvited 'guinea-pig' with my protection not guaranteed beyond the end of January.
Man and boy Palace since my first game in 1948 sitting on my dad's shoulders |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 09 Jan 21 3.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eden Eagle
How is it more dangerous travelling a few miles by car and then taking a walk compared to walking from home if the same social distance rules are applied? You could break down, or have a crash so creating an issue. Rare but not impossible.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jan 21 3.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
You could break down, or have a crash so creating an issue. Rare but not impossible. I have thought about that and recognise it as the only possible downside. If I breakdown I am not so far from home as not to be able to walk back, which I had to last year when I dropped my keys on the walk and it got too dark to find them. (I retrieved them the next day when a kind person found them, put them in a plastic bag and tied that to a post near where I park.) I still think on balance its a wise move. I could just as easily have an accident while on foot in the narrow lanes in the village.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jan 21 3.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Uphill
I was 'over the moon' to receive the Pfizer jab in December. But my 2nd jab on Jan 4th was cancelled as the government wanted to give more people a first dose. My 2nd jab will not be now until March. On the face of it a sensible decision UNTIL I discovered that Pfizer have not trialled a 12 week gap between doses and both the WHO and FDA have stated that the 2nd dose should not be given later than 6 weeks. It is possible I have become an uninvited 'guinea-pig' with my protection not guaranteed beyond the end of January. It's unfortunate but I don't think you need to worry too much. Whilst it's true that the specific trials haven't been done those who developed the vaccines have found that the practice matches the theory very accurately. They understand how vaccines work and seem very confident that your protection will last for a good while. It seems a sensible move when there is limited availability and a surge in the level of infection to make sure that the maximum numbers get initial protection early. I haven't had mine yet and I am 76. A friend who has the same medical condition as me and also has a wife working in the health service, is 56 and was vaccinated before Christmas and has already had two.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.