You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 24 2024 9.01pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Tommy Robinson (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 81 of 236 < 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 >

Topic Locked

dannyboy1978 Flag 06 Jul 18 1.33pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Are you saying pictures can be taken of the accused in the Stephen Lawrence case but not the grooming gang? Both are out side court and both have a jury?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
dannyboy1978 Flag 06 Jul 18 1.40pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Walking into court, nothing done
[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
dannyboy1978 Flag 06 Jul 18 1.44pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Walking into court
[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
dannyboy1978 Flag 06 Jul 18 1.46pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Walking into court
[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Beanyboysmd Flag 06 Jul 18 1.50pm Send a Private Message to Beanyboysmd Add Beanyboysmd as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

Are you saying pictures can be taken of the accused in the Stephen Lawrence case but not the grooming gang? Both are out side court and both have a jury?

Judges discretion I think, if I was a judge I would have applied it to the Stephen Lawrence case too. Always seems to be the case with grooming gangs but very little else. Im guessing its something to do with protecting the victims but im not sure. Not a satisfactory answer I admit but I would have media blanked both rather than one and not the other. I dont think there is a conspiracy there though...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 06 Jul 18 2.03pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Beanyboysmd

Judges discretion I think, if I was a judge I would have applied it to the Stephen Lawrence case too. Always seems to be the case with grooming gangs but very little else. Im guessing its something to do with protecting the victims but im not sure. Not a satisfactory answer I admit but I would have media blanked both rather than one and not the other. I dont think there is a conspiracy there though...

Aren't judges meant to follow the law. In this thread we had people pointing to the law multiple times and justifying Robinson's prosecution.

However, this is just one example that shows up the complete hypocrisy of thus situation.

Who in the general media is making these points......No one....because it has absolutely nothing to do with justice.

I don't know if conspiracy is the right word or maybe it is. However, a political consensus on appeasement to a minority they are scared of which is translated into the institutions and covering up the extent of the problem....I find that hard to argue against.

Churchill would spin in his grave at the shower who hold positions of power in this country.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Jul 2018 2.04pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Oliver Flag Bodega Bay 06 Jul 18 3.59pm Send a Private Message to Oliver Add Oliver as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

Does anyone know why the people videoing the suspects of the Stephen Lawrence case were not retramanded for the same thing as TR.
[Link]

They were leaving a Public Enquiry

 


I have prepared one of my own time capsules. I have placed some rather large samples of dynamite, gunpowder and nitroglycerin. My time capsule is set to go off in the year 3000. It will show them what we are really like.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 06 Jul 18 4.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Oliver

They were leaving a Public Enquiry

And the difference to the prejudged nature of the images is?

These men later stood trial.

How exactly were the public not prejudged by all the press beforehand?

Yet the trials took place anyway.

Proving that this entire line of argument is pure BS.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
elgrande Flag bedford 06 Jul 18 4.44pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

So why was there not reporting restrictions in the trial's of Rolf Harris,Stuart Hall.and Max Clifford.

The amount of media frenzy surrounding those trial's
,Would that not have influenced the jury's.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Oliver Flag Bodega Bay 06 Jul 18 5.08pm Send a Private Message to Oliver Add Oliver as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

And the difference to the prejudged nature of the images is?

These men later stood trial.

How exactly were the public not prejudged by all the press beforehand?

Yet the trials took place anyway.

Proving that this entire line of argument is pure BS.

Was answering the posters question.

Robinson was arrested for a breach of the peace while live streaming outside Leeds Crown Court during a trial on which reporting restrictions had been ordered by the judge. Robinson subsequently admitted contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

Don’t understand the BS bit

Regarding Gary Dobson and David Norris were found guilty by a jury. They were arrested and charged without publicity in 2010 following new evidence which was found due to enhanced forensic and DNA techniques. For legal reasons to protect the investigation and ensure a fair hearing reporting restrictions were put in place at the commencement of these proceedings; the arrests and subsequent developments were not publicly reported at the time. Prior to the trial reporting restrictions were partially lifted but the ruling also emphasised that this was to be "a new trial of a defendant who, we repeat, is presumed in law to be innocent," and suggested a cautious and fact-based reporting style to avoid contempt of court or risk of prejudice to the future trial.

You can see from the above the press and media fully respected the Law following the arrests of Gary Dobson and David Norris. Shame Tommy Robinson has no respect for the Laws of the Land as this and all his previous convictions show.

 


I have prepared one of my own time capsules. I have placed some rather large samples of dynamite, gunpowder and nitroglycerin. My time capsule is set to go off in the year 3000. It will show them what we are really like.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 06 Jul 18 5.21pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Oliver

Was answering the posters question.

Robinson was arrested for a breach of the peace while live streaming outside Leeds Crown Court during a trial on which reporting restrictions had been ordered by the judge. Robinson subsequently admitted contempt of court by publishing information that could prejudice an ongoing trial.

Don’t understand the BS bit

Regarding Gary Dobson and David Norris were found guilty by a jury. They were arrested and charged without publicity in 2010 following new evidence which was found due to enhanced forensic and DNA techniques. For legal reasons to protect the investigation and ensure a fair hearing reporting restrictions were put in place at the commencement of these proceedings; the arrests and subsequent developments were not publicly reported at the time. Prior to the trial reporting restrictions were partially lifted but the ruling also emphasised that this was to be "a new trial of a defendant who, we repeat, is presumed in law to be innocent," and suggested a cautious and fact-based reporting style to avoid contempt of court or risk of prejudice to the future trial.

You can see from the above the press and media fully respected the Law following the arrests of Gary Dobson and David Norris. Shame Tommy Robinson has no respect for the Laws of the Land as this and all his previous convictions show.

Anyone claiming that the Lawrence suspects could receive a fair trail in the UK after the publicity they had received is a liar......It is proof that the contentions made in this thread about Robinson prejudging any proceedings are BS.

They are pure hypocrisy and an agenda driven use of the law...laws that is subjectively enacted.

I no longer have faith in the laws of the land anymore. nor its enforcers. Not when the EDL were proven right about criminal rang gang acts years before the so called authorities are forced to act upon it....only after being shamed into it by the press.

Rape gangs in over twenty towns, thousands of girls.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Jul 2018 5.22pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Oliver Flag Bodega Bay 06 Jul 18 5.23pm Send a Private Message to Oliver Add Oliver as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

So why was there not reporting restrictions in the trial's of Rolf Harris,Stuart Hall.and Max Clifford.

The amount of media frenzy surrounding those trial's
,Would that not have influenced the jury's.

The Judge Marson imposed additional reporting restrictions under Section 4 of the Contempt of Court Act, which postponed reporting on the case. Section 4 is used when there are due to be subsequent trials of the same offence and reporting the outcome of the first trial might prejudice the jury in the later ones.

Tommy Robinson was broadcasting on Facebook Live outside Leeds Crown Court filming people entering the court in relation to an ongoing trial. He filmed himself as he read out the defendants' names and the charges they face - some of which were wrong - and confronted them as they arrived at court.

 


I have prepared one of my own time capsules. I have placed some rather large samples of dynamite, gunpowder and nitroglycerin. My time capsule is set to go off in the year 3000. It will show them what we are really like.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 81 of 236 < 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic