You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > General Election 2017
November 24 2024 9.41pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

General Election 2017

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 81 of 450 < 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 >

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 27 Apr 17 12.36pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Problem with the service sector job increases, its generally low pay, low prospect work. McJobs, supermarket work etc and as such service industry work tends to appeal to casual workers (such as students), single young workers, 'top up workers' and of course migrant workers. They're not 'real jobs'.

Housing Market - Is the curse create by successive governments - Realistically, in order to resolve the housing crisis in the UK, the housing market will need to be burst. Its been artificially inflated now for decades and realistically, no longer really serves it purpose.

Rents and Prices are ridiculously high, and even poor accommodation is a massive burden on peoples incomes - Which has a massive knock on in terms of the value of wages (and of course welfare budgets - where the housing benefit is now one of the most expensive burdens). Who wants to work when 50-75% of your wages is paying for most average to poor accommodation.

Realistically, the UK needed to adapt housing policy as far back as the late 80s, to ensure citizens affordable housing (which in turn makes minimum and low wage jobs more enticing) but to do so now is going to be a brutally bitter pill to swallow.

Housing cannot continue to be 'investments', but every government since the late 80s has failed society on this, instead pointing to the affluence generation and rising market without any attempt to review the issues it causes.

I think a good gauge (I understand not universal) is that in the past dads went to work, mums stayed at home and families still had disposable income. Nowadays many people struggle from week to week with 2 incomes.

Edited by nickgusset (27 Apr 2017 12.37pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 27 Apr 17 12.39pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

I think a good gauge (I understand not universal) is that in the past dads went to work, mums stayed at home and families still had disposable income. Nowadays many people struggle from week to week with 2 incomes.

Edited by nickgusset (27 Apr 2017 12.37pm)

Out goings are much higher. Expectations are much higher.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 27 Apr 17 12.43pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

I'm not fudging any numbers. I've given you them all verbatim, including data on the disposable incomes of the bottom 20%.

Including all other groups provides context, which is necessary to understand how bad or good something is and its significance.

In that report you posted the absolute poverty numbers dropped. In the ONS figures I quotes the bottom 20% became better off in real terms...

Relatively working non-parents became worse off, but were still relatively better off as they were better off to begin with.

For most of Labour's tenure they enjoyed boom times. These are not impressive realities. Well to you they obviously are. And income inequality did widen, which is what I said.

'Better off' my foot.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 27 Apr 17 12.50pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Housing costs are the biggest burden on any family.
The cost of private rentals are beyond a joke.

My daughter has been renting a flat near carlshalton ponds for the past 7 years (paying roughly £800 pm).

The landlord is now selling the flat...he's moving abroad I think so no blame to him.

She went to a letting agency and they wanted £ 500 pounds just to register and do a credit check...(at least dicks turpin wore a mask.),

So she looked and eventually found a 2 bedroom house being rented privately,the landlord had supplied very good references...but it's now costing her £1200 a month.

She and her partner both work and has my grand daughter who goes to school in the area so couldn't move far.

But that's 1200 pounds per month without anything else..criminal.
,

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 27 Apr 17 12.50pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Problem with the service sector job increases, its generally low pay, low prospect work. McJobs, supermarket work etc and as such service industry work tends to appeal to casual workers (such as students), single young workers, 'top up workers' and of course migrant workers. They're not 'real jobs'.

Housing Market - Is the curse create by successive governments - Realistically, in order to resolve the housing crisis in the UK, the housing market will need to be burst. Its been artificially inflated now for decades and realistically, no longer really serves it purpose.

Rents and Prices are ridiculously high, and even poor accommodation is a massive burden on peoples incomes - Which has a massive knock on in terms of the value of wages (and of course welfare budgets - where the housing benefit is now one of the most expensive burdens). Who wants to work when 50-75% of your wages is paying for most average to poor accommodation.

Realistically, the UK needed to adapt housing policy as far back as the late 80s, to ensure citizens affordable housing (which in turn makes minimum and low wage jobs more enticing) but to do so now is going to be a brutally bitter pill to swallow.

Housing cannot continue to be 'investments', but every government since the late 80s has failed society on this, instead pointing to the affluence generation and rising market without any attempt to review the issues it causes.

All true.

It's apart of the 'sacred cows' ideology for the Tory party. Home owners are their people.....The disfigurement and unfairness of where we are now is entirely politically encouraged.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 27 Apr 17 12.55pm Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

For most of Labour's tenure they enjoyed boom times. These are not impressive realities. Well to you they obviously are. And income inequality did widen, which is what I said.

'Better off' my foot.

But Stirling, do you really see no difference between Corbyn and Blair? Do you see a Corbyn government ever pushing for financial deregulation, PFI, corporation tax cuts, or condoning businesses employing cheap labour abroad to undercut UK wages?

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 27 Apr 17 1.01pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

But Stirling, do you really see no difference between Corbyn and Blair? Do you see a Corbyn government ever pushing for financial deregulation, PFI, corporation tax cuts, or condoning businesses employing cheap labour abroad to undercut UK wages?

No there is definitely a difference.

What Blair did to help the working classes, with the minimal wage and working tax credits he took away with foreigner job competition with its added housing and infrastructure problems.....In fact with the housing inaction I think the overall upshot was worse for the real working class. And in areas like mine they couldn't even call their living spaces their own anymore...Apparently they were racists if they felt like that.

As I see it, Corbyn plans to tax the rich to pay for his pledges.

It doesn't work. It only works if you're the only place where the rich want to live and make significant profits. We aren't quite that.

France showed us what we already knew....these ideas are old and failed.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Apr 2017 1.07pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 27 Apr 17 1.07pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

Housing costs are the biggest burden on any family.
The cost of private rentals are beyond a joke.

My daughter has been renting a flat near carlshalton ponds for the past 7 years (paying roughly £800 pm).

The landlord is now selling the flat...he's moving abroad I think so no blame to him.

She went to a letting agency and they wanted £ 500 pounds just to register and do a credit check...(at least dicks turpin wore a mask.),

So she looked and eventually found a 2 bedroom house being rented privately,the landlord had supplied very good references...but it's now costing her £1200 a month.

She and her partner both work and has my grand daughter who goes to school in the area so couldn't move far.

But that's 1200 pounds per month without anything else..criminal.
,

That is shocking and what's worse is that for plenty of areas in London that would be the lower end of the scale. Stupid Thatcher back in the 80's and her housing policies. Really fvcked things up for plenty now. Deregulated rent controls and no b@stard politician has brought them back since.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 27 Apr 17 1.14pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

That is shocking and what's worse is that for plenty of areas in London that would be the lower end of the scale. Stupid Thatcher back in the 80's and her housing policies. Really fvcked things up for plenty now. Deregulated rent controls and no b@stard politician has brought them back since.

Yep, selling off council house stock without replacing them was probably the single worse thing Thatcher did.

Great short term policy for her....Terrible for the long term for those lower down the ladder.

She was a mixed bag...Better than Foot, who had lost control but the medicine she applied was ideological rather than practical.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 27 Apr 17 1.26pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

For most of Labour's tenure they enjoyed boom times. These are not impressive realities. Well to you they obviously are. And income inequality did widen, which is what I said.

'Better off' my foot.

A lower proportion of that group are in absolute poverty so are better off. What about that is confusing?

When did I say I was impressed with "boom times"?

I've pointed out that inequality did widen, I've not claimed otherwise. I've also pointed out that's a bad thing and nothing has been done since Major to address the sharp rises in inequality seen under Thatcher.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 27 Apr 17 1.26pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Yep, selling off council house stock without replacing them was probably the single worse thing Thatcher did.

Great short term policy for her....Terrible for the long term for those lower down the ladder.

She was a mixed bag...Better than Foot, who had lost control but the medicine she applied was ideological rather than practical.

I agree Stirling, I thought it was a great idea at the time, aspirations of everyone owning their own home.
But as you quite rightly said the stocks should have been brought back up to the level they were.
I really don't what the answer is.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 27 Apr 17 1.28pm

Originally posted by elgrande

I agree Stirling, I thought it was a great idea at the time, aspirations of everyone owning their own home.
But as you quite rightly said the stocks should have been brought back up to the level they were.
I really don't what the answer is.

I do.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 81 of 450 < 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > General Election 2017